ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Divine Blood Controversy

Here is a new twist on the "Divine Blood" controversy. What do you think of this statement? "Adam and Eve, they had divine blood in their veins when they were created." "It was the curse that brought on human blood...that changed their system inside."

Join Our Christian Friendship and Take The False Teachers Bible Quiz
 ---Bruce5656 on 12/19/06
     Helpful Blog Vote (7)

Post a New Blog



Ernest Angley, Divine Blood teacher, was Mrs. Morgan's arena. Her name has disappeared but I say howdy, Mrs. Morgan.

I have a difficult time getting past Ernest's healing lines of people every week without a sense of smell or taste. That's way beyond bizarre for me.
---lisa on 6/11/08


Blood is blood, and is not transformable. When the first humans sinned their blood did not change, it remained the same: but what changed was their being blessed by God for their obedience into being cursed by God for their disobedience.
---Eloy on 6/11/08


I think they had perfect human blood. Were they not created to live forever? The animals and plants were pure. Then sin came and brought death. I'm sure the DNA in all life changed and pollutants came onto the scene along with sickness and then death. If they had divinde blood then they couldn't have died. Isn't that why they got kicked out of the garden...so they wouoldn't be like God and live forever?
---john on 6/10/08


.

RIGHTO, ALLEN


That is why I characterized such goings on as WOLFISHNESS

Wolves sometimes look like sheep, but actually destroy the sheep.
---John_T on 12/22/06


There is nothing in scipture to back up divine blood in Adam and eve and I see nothing in trying to prove it. There are a lot more important things to discuss, I think this falls under this scripture.1 Timothy 6:20 O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called:
---Exzucuh on 12/22/06




Observer, what book are you talking about? I have put down passage after passage right from Scripture. It is what I have shown since I got on line. The only times when I have to look at books is when I have to go to the history of the Catholic church, Islam, and the commentaries and Word Study books. Is there a particular book you need to help you? I would suggest to get at least two commentaries to help you know what was happening at the time when the passages were written.
---lisa on 12/22/06


2. there is not enough time in a persons life to read and study everything Observer, so we use what God has given us, our brain to look and study as much as possible if we truely want to know God. There have been great man of God that have helped us. Through years I have written a lot on this subjects that to me they come normal. If there is one particular part you have a question, ask and I will give it to you. I am here to help and also to receive help from others that are well schooled in Scripture.
---lisa on 12/22/06


There are three things that agree in the name of Jesus and that we are born of God

1 John 5:8 And there are three that bear witness in earth, the Spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.

Baptized in the Spirit, in the water, and our faith in the Blood.
---Exzucuh on 12/22/06


Bruce ... Yes it sounds fine doesn't it, until you try to understand what he is saying. And then you find he has said sweet zero.
---alanUKquent64534 on 12/22/06


Mrs. Morgan - You are deceived if you think that you never sin. The Bible does not teach sinless perfection for Christians. The only Person Who has sinless perfection is the Lord Jesus Christ. We all sin, even the strongest of Christians fail at times and have to ask the Lord for forgiveness. If you say you have no sin, you are calling God a liar (1 John 1:8).
---Helen_5378 on 12/22/06




PART ONE:
Mrs Morgan,
"Bruce has falsely accused my church as teaching cult teachings,"

When did I do that? Are you refering to the fact that I said the teaching that Adam had "divine" blood smacks of Mormanism?
---Bruce5656 on 12/22/06


PART TWO:
The idiom "smacks of" means similar to. Mormonism teaches Adam was a God. Angley says Adam had "divine" blood. That sounds similar to me. That is not to say Angley is teaching that Adam was a god but it is similar to the Mormon belief. Saying it is similar is not saying your church teaches "cult teachings."
---Bruce5656 on 12/22/06


PART THREE:
I would like to think that Angley uses the expression as a sort of catch phrase. It is interesting that when you read his older material it does not come up nearly as often. There are other preachers who use the exact same language as Angley only they use the "Name of Jesus" in stead of "divine blood."
---Bruce5656 on 12/22/06


PART FOUR:
You could take almost every instance of Angley's use of "divine blood" and substitute "Name of Jesus" and you would have the kind of preaching you might hear in another church. In either case, it is the use of an catch phrase or jargon that can cause confusion. It sounds so spiritual but what does it really mean?
---Bruce5656 on 12/22/06


PART FIVE:
The problem with Angley, is that he never clearly defines what he means by divine blood. If he simply meant sinless blood that would be one thing (even though blood cannot sin) but he seems to say that there was something physically different about their "divine" blood that made it materially different from human blood.
---Bruce5656 on 12/22/06


lisa, when you copy out of a book, please give the reference or author. Thank you.
---Observer on 12/21/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Refinancing


Hebrews 9:1 Then verily the first covenant had also ordinances of divine service, and a worldly sanctuary.
2 Peter 1:3 According as his divine power hath given unto us all things that pertain unto life and godliness, through the knowledge of him that hath called us to glory and virtue:
2 Peter 1:4 Whereby are given unto us exceeding great and precious promises: that by these ye might be partakers of the divine nature, having escaped the corruption that is in the world through lust.
---Exzucuh on 12/21/06


Divine service, divine power, divine Nature, whats so hard to believe about divine blood. It does not say divine blood but it also does not say that it is not divine so it would be more logical to except Jesus blood as divine seeing his flesh was made of God his blood must be divine to be sinless and not corrupted by Adam's blood.
---Exzucuh on 12/21/06


Revelation 7:14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
Here is a scripture that says the blood washes white only divine blood can do that all other blood makes things turn red.
---Exzucuh on 12/21/06


John 6:54 Whoso eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, hath eternal life; and I will raise him up at the last day.
the blood has power to give eternal life that makes it divine only God has that power.
---Exzucuh on 12/21/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Franchises


Romans 3:25 Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God;
We are to have faith in his blood, you can only have faith in God so that makes his blood divine.
---Exzucuh on 12/21/06


6. Morgan, You'r kind, you speak great, and you do love the Lord. We all love you too and want to help you. While its easy to follow something wrong for a long time and believe it, it can be corrected. Everyone that answers wants to help you. God's word does not change. It will speak to you if you don't put your words in it. I know you love your pastor, but clearly you can see what you say is not in Scripture. We all need Christ in our lives Morgan, to help us, without Him we are really nothing.
---lisa on 12/21/06


The blood of Jesus is described in thse verse."Forasmuch as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold, from your vain conversation received by tradition from your fathers;"
"But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot:" in 1st Peter 1:18-19 and is a perfect description of divine blood.
---Mima on 12/21/06


Pharisse,"A ministry without a binding statement of faith has loose guidelines in which to produce doctrine."

My point exactly. The first thing I look for on a denomination or ministry website is the statement of faith. When I don't find one, it makes me wonder...
---Bruce5656 on 12/21/06


Send a Free Support Ecard


PART ONE:
Every time I go back to see if I can find a clarification of what Angley means by "divine blood" I come away with more questions. Today I read this:
"I use the blood. I fast through the blood; I believe through the blood; I love through the blood; I have compassion through the blood. I have been given control over the blood, control to use divine blood love, grace, peace, and control to serve it to others. I love the blood!"
---Bruce5656 on 12/21/06


PART TWO:
At no point does he offer any explanation as to what he means by "divine blood" but he speaks of it as an entity in and of itself.

Again, I am left wondering: why is this kind of language/teaching not in the bible?
---Bruce5656 on 12/21/06


6 who speaks to the Father in our defense-Jesus Christ, the Righteous One. He is the atoning sacrifice (the propitiation, the covering, the mercy seat), the "hilasterion" for our sins, and not only for ours but also for the sins of the whole world." So that if we do sin, Jesus Christ as our Savior is our covering for our sins, and He has forgiven us all of our trespasses, Ephesians 1 tells us. I suggest that you study Scripture without listening to your pastor.
---lisa on 12/21/06


5. also their assurance of that salvation. One thing that does happen to that back-slidden person is, God forgive them in spite of their sin. This Morgan is from Scripture. And the text is 1 John 2:1, "My little children, these thing write I unto you, that you sin not." And of course, we know tht He is refering to believers whom He calls His dear children. Don't sin! Obviously, don't be disobedient or back-slidden, "But if anybody does sin, we have One
---lisa on 12/21/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Lead Generation


Mrs Morgan

divine blood=Incorruptible/non-perishable blood. By who's definition?


Divine is principly defined as
Random House Dict: of or pertaining to a god, esp. the Supreme Being.
American Heritage Dict: Having the nature of or being a deity.
Kennerman English Multilingual Dict: of or belonging to God or a god
---Bruce5656 on 12/21/06


Morgan, I'am dissappointed to hear you speak as you do to brother Bruce, you above all that claims to be without sin. How can you justify your teachings when you have no Scripture passages to confirm what you write about the blood or sinless? In fact if you claim to be perfect, what you are telling us is that you are not a child of God, your an illegitment child. For all Christians need chastening. All Christians sin. You and Eloy take a stance of Glorification and encorruptable,
---lisa on 12/21/06


2. which only proves how far you and he is in the truth. Here is what Scripture says about what you believe, "My son, despise not though the chastening of the lord, nor faint when thou are rebuked of Him: For whom the Lord loveth He chasteneth, and scourgeth every son whom He receiveth. If you endure chastening, God dealeth with you as with sons; for what son is he whom the father chasteneth not? And if He doesn't chasten you, then you are an illegitmate child, and not a son at all." now
---lisa on 12/21/06


3. if you go to 2 John 8, I want to show you a second thing that can occur in the life of a backslidden, disobedient Christian. Verse 8, Watch out that you do not lose what you have worked for, but that you may be rewared fully." What this indicates, is that a believer could come to the point in his life where his disobedience caused the forfeiture of that which he had already gained as a reward for the good works he had done previous to his disobedience.
---lisa on 12/21/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Mortgages


4. The Lord has given you a promise that there will be a reward for faithfulness. If you are faithful He has given the reward, but He reserves the right to take it back, in light of unfaithfulness. So there definitely will be chastening by the Lord. There should be chasteing by the Church too. There will be a loss of reward; an empty-handedness if you will at tht time of rewards at the Bema Seat. When a person is back-slidden, and disobedient, and sinful, they not only lose the sense of their salvation,
---lisa on 12/21/06


I would appreciate you pointing out to me where, on Mr. Amgley's website I can find a statement of belief. I could not find it.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06

A ministry without a binding statement of faith has loose guidelines in which to produce doctrine.
---Pharisee on 12/20/06


divine, no I think not.adam and eve were never divine,either in blood or anything else.why would God have had to tell them not to eat? in the day you eat you will surely die.sin came upon them,divinity can,t sin,if God made them so perfect so divine they would never have fallen.adam was Gods creation made in his image not made divine.
---tom2 on 12/20/06


tom2, Bruce has falsely accused my church as teaching cult teachings, and made insulting comments toward my minister, Now that is "lashing out", I'm saying that his teaching and beliefs should also be examined, not just select ministers, that is what I meant by not being hypocritical /double standards, and taking apart, examining his beliefs too, like he is doing. There is nothing wrong with examining things, But God hates hypocrisy. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Personal Loans


(II.) tom2, I do believe it is time to walk away from this blog, so I will. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


You are trying to call someone else a false teacher, well why not take apart ALL of your teachings? Let's not be hypocritical now, minister Bruce.
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06

Why not take apart my teachings too, After all, I am a fool who believes that all you have to do is love and believe in Jesus Christ to be saved.
---Pharisee on 12/20/06


mrs morgan,bruce need not explain himself to you at all. we will all answer for words and deeds and the judgement seat of christ.what we are to endeavor is to UPLIFT AND ENCOURAGE ONE ANOTHER. could you please try this for a change?oR will you lash out at me also?
---tom2 on 12/20/06


(I.) {"Adam and Eve, they had divine blood in their veins when they were created." "It was the curse that brought on human blood...that changed their system inside." } --Yes, Adam and Eve would of lived for ever(originally when they were created they had both a eternal/immortal body to match....
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Auto Insurance


(II.) ....their eternal soul), They were immortal(would of lived forever in their physical bodies) at one time(most Christian's know this), they were created in perfection in, and they lost all of that when they sinned, God warned them. At the Rapture God's Redeemed will have a glorified body, which will also be immortal/eternal to match their souls. Come let us REASON together,says the Lord. *Corruptible=temporary /Incorruptible=eternal. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Corruptible=perishable, and Incorruptible=non-perishable. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


...divine blood=Incorruptible/non-perishable blood. I know some will understand. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Helen_5378 , You call someone a false teacher, Yet you and some other's believe in being a "sinnersaint"? Which is a CONTRADICTION, btw. I think you said you are not OSAS, but you have said that a born-again child of God is still a sinner? Not consistant with what born-agan means. From what the Lord tells me there is a DIFFERENCE in being a sinner and a saint. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Holidays


Mrs Morgan,
" ... why not take apart ALL of your teachings?"

What does that mean exactly? "take apart all of your teachings? If you look up PAOC dot org and find the statement of fundamental and essential truths (ABOUT US - then scroll to the bottom) and tell me if there is something in there that needs to be "taken apart."

I would appreciate you pointing out to me where, on Mr. Amgley's website I can find a statement of belief. I could not find it.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


Mrs. Morgan
"Bruce,YOUR words,from 9/4/06:"PART ONE
"
Would you be so kind as to refer me to the spicific blog that quote was taken from so I can see the context? Thanks.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


"People will have to listen to the Holy Spirit and decide this for themselves"

When listening to the Holy Spirit there is nothing to decide; that's why we listen.
---Pharisee on 12/20/06


PART ONE:
Mrs. Morgan
"How could your affiliation with the PAOC, AND that fact that you are/have been a minister/preacher, NOT be relevant to what is going on here?"

As you noted in the quotation I said I am a Pentecostal preacher not minister. To me a "minister" is someone who has a pastorate. I do not. A preacher is someone who preaches and I do fill in for vacationing pastors etc.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Health Insurance


PART TWO:
If I were/am a Pentecostal or Baptist etc minister or preacher etc. in what way is that relevant to what is bible truth? Even if I were a full time minister, my words/thoughts/ideas carry no more force or validity than anyone elses .

So tell me, in what way is it relevant?
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


PART THREE:
I suspect that you will find the quote of mine you noted from another blog was made only made after extensive discussion had already taken place. Not to try to give any force or importance to what was said to but only to clarify that I come from an traditional Pentecostal background. Once I see the context I will be able to state more specifically why it was even mentioned.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


PART FOUR:
However:.

Look at the wording:
"For what it is worth" means "whether or not this is of value" or "what I am telling you (Pentecostal preacher etc) is not of any particular importance."

This is reinforced with the statement:
"I do not make reference to this on these blogs because it is irrelevant." And so it is.

Clearly, there was no intention to put my self in any higher place than anyone else.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


"The fact that my affiliation is with the PAOC or that I was ordained with the PAOC is totally irrelevant to any discussions here." --Bruce,YOU are the one mentioning credentials for some reason,AND How could your affiliation with the PAOC, AND that fact that you are/have been a minister/preacher,NOT be relevant to what is going on here?You are trying to call someone else a false teacher, well why not take apart ALL of your teachings? Let's not be hypocritical now, minister Bruce.
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Dating


"God's reason for creating Adam was to reproduce Himself. Adam was not subordinate to God. Adam was God manifested in the flesh. When Adam originally sinned he gave his god nature to Satan." ---Not what we teach at Grace Cathedral, But if you would like to take the TIME to RESEARCH things before making unfounded statements, by all means please do, That's what I and other's believe in doing.
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Divine Blood is receiving the breath of life which is from God, which is the spirit of God. It is God putting his words in your mouth and you being able to speak what He wants. Prophecy.
---Tonne_Miessek on 12/20/06


(I.)Its dangerous to speak against a minister without thorough concrete research(especially when their ministries show the EVIDENCE of godly fruit, people getting save, healed, etc., A person can foolishly make themselves an enemy of God by doing that.),Thorough VIABLE Facts , My words are limited about ministers unless a thorough research into there teachings,doctrines,life style is done(under the guidance of the Holy Spirit), and even then,...
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


(II.)....God wont ALWAYS move on a child of God to mention a ministers name. Many that use their time going after certain ministers, are full of error themselves. My question to people: Is God moving on you? Giving you the GREEN LIGHT to say the things being said? Because certain signs being show, isnt consistent with Gods way of doing things, IS VOID OF THE UNCTION OF THE HOLY SPIRIT, without that UNCTION....
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Health Treatments


(III.)....one would have to assume someone is either jealous, egotistical, bias, or obsessive,Thus attacking, not REALLY examining him/her in a godly way.Yes , EVERY minister must be taken to the Word of God, in the RIGHT WAY, and not in a reckless unguided way,(motivated by self,bias, ego,jealousy,etc., TRY THE SPIRITS) But under the direction of the Holy Spirit,some dont have the Holy Spirit, so they dont have any direction. I heard of people going after true children of God and God killed them.
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


(IV.)Research is very good, "But be wise", Is the way I and others do things. GOD KNOWS ALL, SEARCHES THE HEARTS AND THE MOTIVATIONS. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Re what Tina quoted from Kenneth Copeland -- That is scary because that man has many, many people following him and believing what he says. He is a false prophet. Come quickly Lord Jesus.
---Helen_5378 on 12/20/06


(I.)Bruce,YOUR words,from 9/4/06:"PART ONE:
Mrs. Morgan
For what it is worth. To answer some of your questions and make a few things clear. I am a Pentecostal preacher affiliated with the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada. I do not make reference to this on these blogs because it is irrelevant. If you know anything about the PAOC (think Assemblies of God the US counterpart) you will know that I am affiliated with what may be the most evenly balanced arm of Pentecost.--Bruce5656 on 9/4/06 ...
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Affiliate Program


(II.)Bruce5656 , .... --Here's the Second part of YOUR words: "PART TWO:
My theology is very orthodox Pentecostal including
- Salvation by faith alone (water baptism and Holy Spirit baptism not required for salvation)
- Subsequent to salvation Baptism in the Holy Spirit with the initial evidence of speaking in tongues.- Divine healing.- Laying on of hands and anointing with oil. - Trinitarian- No OSAS- Etc.
---Bruce5656 on 9/4/06
---Bruce, Care to explain that?
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


(III.)Bruce, I'm only going by what I read that you wrote and agreed with on the blogs, nothing else, I don't get your point??
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/20/06


PART ONE:
I had posted this to the wrong blog.
Mrs Morgan,
Correct me if I'm wrong , But I think I recall Bruce5656 said he is a Minister and Apologetic of the Pentecostal affiliation, in Canada?

I never said that. I have stated in the past that I was a minister ordained with the Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada. I am not presently because in order to maintain ones credentials with the PAOC you have to preach so many times a year. I do not meet that requirement.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


Even if I did, unless I was in full time ministry, I would not bother with ordination credentials.

You are the first one to call me an apologetic. I never called my self that before but, in how I communicate on these blogs, I think it has merit. The PAOC does not have any such credential as "Apologetic" and I have never heard any other denomination have such a designation either.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Abortion Facts


PART THREE:
The fact that my affiliation is with the PAOC or that I was ordained with the PAOC is totally irrelevant to any discussions here. I cannot remember ever telling someone they should listen to what I have to say because of my past experience. In fact, in the past I have challenged those who have signed themselves Rev. ***** to these blogs to reconsider that practice because there
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


PART FOUR:
are those who when seeing that a comment is from a Rev. could be swayed to think it is more valid than any other blog entry.

As any long time member of ChristiaNet can attest to, rarely have I made reference to my ministerial background or experience and then only for a very specific reason. NOT to add credence to anything I might say.
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


PART FIVE:
When it comes to proving if what someone has to say is right or wrong, it does not matter what my or anyone elses credentials are. It doesnt matter how big a church you attend or even pastor. It doesnt matter how many people are reached by that ministry or how many books you have written. All that matters is "What sayeth the Scripture"? Romans 4:3a,

Romans 3:4, "let God be true, but every man a liar."
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


Tina
Re what K Copeland said - Yikes!
---Bruce5656 on 12/20/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Acne Treatment


Bruce, Oh My! What will they come up with next? Nothing that comes out of the teachings of Mrs. Morgan and her clan can back up anything they say with scripture.

I wonder Mrs. Morgan, when you are slain in your spirit, is your blood changed to divine blood too with that transaction? Or when is it that your blood becomes divine? Didn't you say Jesus divine blood becomes ours at some point?

This gets more and more interesting as time goes on.
---kathr4453 on 12/20/06


++But after hearing Mr. Angley's message "Why Won't People Use the Blood", I am ever more convinced that this line of theology is unsound. The concept that Adam and Eve had "divine blood" smacks of Mormonism."

Rx: Yup. This reminds me of what Kenneth Copeland teaches.

God's reason for creating Adam was to reproduce Himself. Adam was not subordinate to God. Adam was God manifested in the flesh. When Adam originally sinned he gave his god nature to Satan. K Copeland
---Tina5349 on 12/19/06


Bruce5656, People will have to listen to the Holy Spirit and decide this for themselves, period, not every body is going to agree.
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/19/06


Adam and Eve had nothing within bodies to make them live forever before the fall. They would have lived because; Genesis 2:9-;the tree of life also in the midst of the garden -. It was the tree of life that would have allowed them to live forever, but their sin shut them out away from that tree and therefore sin brought death to mankind. Rev 2:7 shows tree in heaven for him who overcometh. Also read Rev 22:14-may have a right to the tree of life-. Tree of Life,12 manner of fruit,leaves for healing.
---Darlene_1 on 12/19/06


Read These Insightful Articles About Bad Credit Loans


I mention this because up until now, I was thinking that it was just a wrong emphasis to insist everyone use the expression "divine blood." But after hearing Mr. Angley's message "Why Won't People Use the Blood", I am ever more convinced that this line of theology is unsound. The concept that Adam and Eve had "divine blood" smacks of Mormonism.

Once again, if it were "divine blood" vs the death and resurrection of Jesus that saves why didn't Paul say so?
---Bruce5656 on 12/19/06


Correct me if I'm wrong , But I think I recall Bruce5656 said he is a Minister and Apologetic of the Pentecostal affiliation, in Canada? There are many things that I and other's disagree with "minister Bruce" about(though some things agree), Not only about the divine Blood of Jesus. EVERY minister must be examined with the Word of God, not just some select few. I just wanted to make that CLEAR.
---Mrs._Morgan on 12/19/06


I'm not familiar with the term, but it sounds dangerously close to the "Word of Faith" heresies taught by Kenneth Copeland and his ilk.

"Heresy Happens!! Truth Matters!!" Bob Liichow
---Tina5349 on 12/19/06


Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.