ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Is Evolution True Science

Is the evolutionary hypothesis science?

Join Our Free Penpals and Take The Evolution Bible Quiz
 ---jerry6593 on 8/9/10
     Helpful Blog Vote (5)

Post a New Blog



Alan, I do not take Scripture literally, but at face value, unless there is good reason not to do so. One example of a good reason is where figures of speech are used.

Genesis one however is Hebrew prose, plain straight forward language. In this God defines what one day is and says He created in 6 of these, rested the 7th. Exodus 20:8-11 reinforces that these are everyday ordinary days. See Deuteronomy 16:8 are these ordinary everyday days or not? If so why? If not why?

Despite 6 day creation being the only time-frame Scripture gives you will not believe this. This is not a position of faith.

Now you raise doubts about the veracity of Noah,s world-wide flood because God does not mention something!
---Warwick on 12/3/10


Alan if you accepted God's word by faith you would not continually raise doubts. If you accepted God's original creation took 6 days you would not be doubtfull regarding the truth of Noah's flood. The God of creation is surely able to lower oceans basins in any time-period He chooses.

The flood waters began receeding day 150 of the 360 + days the flood lasted. I give it to God that He did what He said, and said what He did. He was in control, and it did not get out of His control as per the Sorcerer's Apprentice.

It is by faith we are saved and inherit heaven, not doubt.

God has not given us all the details of heaven. Just enough to make me glad I am going there. Do we need to know everything to believe?
---Warwick on 12/3/10


Evolutionists commonly say 'science' has proven microbe-to-man evolution, and that all scientists believe in evolution.

This is untrue as thousands of scientists accept Genesis 1 as true history. For example Dr Matti Leisola has won many scientific prizes, was director of research at an international biotech company, and now Dean of the Faculty of Chemical and Mateial Sciences at the Finnish Alto University. He has published 120+ scientific papers and authored many articles. His articles are cited in scientific literature c1,300 times!

A common untruth spread by evolutionists is that scientists who believe in Biblical creation are not real scientists nd do not write scientific papers. Obviously untrue.
---Warwick on 12/3/10


Alan: "the time scale where we differ ... huge quakes, tsunmais etc ... of which the Bible makes no mention."

Gen 7:11 ... the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.

Gen 7:19,20 And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth, and all the high hills, that were under the whole heaven, were covered. Fifteen cubits upward did the waters prevail, and the mountains were covered.

Gen 7:24 And the waters prevailed upon the earth an hundred and fifty days.

This cataclysmic "breakup" fits well with earthquakes, tsunamis, turbidic fossil deposition, plate tectonic mechanics, ocean trench formation and subsequent continental drain.
---jerry6593 on 12/4/10


Warwick ... On occasion, i have interpreted it as less literal than you would have it, but that is not lack of trust. It is difference on slight detail.

When and on what issues do you say I have distrusted God's word? You made the charge ... courtesy suggests you should answer.

As to the Flood, mountains, cliffs etc ... there is no dispute about the way in which the rearing up of mountain ranges would occur at the same time as ocean deepening in certain places ... it's a bit obvious isn't it?

It is the time scale where we differ ... and the fact that if this had happened in a short period of a few weeks as the Flood receded, there would have been huge quakes, tsunmais etc ... of which the Bible makes no mention.
---alan8566_of_UK on 12/3/10




Alan you have often shown distrust of God's word.

God's word says He 'deluged and destroyed' that world 2 Peter 3:6, to 'destroy all life under the heavens' Genesis 6:17, 'every living creature I have made' Genesis 7:4

Today we see billions of dead things buried in sedimentary rock layers worldwide. Investigation reveals these sediments were deposited in a short period of time, consistent with the worldwide flood.

God said He created a place for the flood waters causing them to flow off the earth into these basins. At this time, as a consequence of the lowering of the sea-floor the mountains rose.

It all depends upon whether you trust God or man's changing stories!
---Warwick on 12/3/10


No, it is merely one of many foolish fantasies from unregenerate minds.
---Eloy on 12/3/10


Warwick ... The events don't tie up ... at least your version.

fossils lid down
When and how
Flood recedes
Fossils moved then?
Mountains created ... when & how?

You say I constantly doubt other parts of the Bible ... what bits would that be, please. It's easy for you to say that to discredit my comments here, but please clarify.
---alan8566_of_UK on 12/3/10


Alan it depends upon whom you believe. God (who was there) repeatedly says His creation took 6 days.

No other time scale is given.

But you place man's 'science' above God's perfect word. Such 'science' as claims virgins do not conceive. Such 'science' as claims the dead do not rise again but Jesus did, and many others. God says Virgins conceive and the dead rise!

The God of Scripture is not limited by time/matter/space.

He says He assigned a place for the waters to flow to. Not there before obviously.

Why does He need to say how long this took?

If you believed God created in 6 days you would not doubt other sections of Scripture as you constantly do. The rot starts with doubt of Genesis.
---Warwick on 12/3/10


The flood lasted over a year and there were no civilizations that survived through this.
In fact, the civilizations started appearing amazingly just after the Worldwide Flood approximately 2700bc
Look it up.. no written record from any civilization before that era. I have posted the civilizations with their aprox. written record date before.
---micha9344 on 12/2/10




Warwick .... and all that happened within the space of a few weeks?
---alan8566_of_UK on 12/2/10

I love this argument. There never was a "World Wide" flood. It is not scriptural.
There was a massive flood. It did kill off Noah's evil relatives. But no other civilizations living during this period. Noah was the only one perfect in his ethnic generations.
All these old world wide universalist false doctrines do is restrict the truth which does align with the facts we have today. Punishment should be observed if nothing else for building/adhering to false foundations in scripture, by self proclaimed preacher/teachers who witness they are not.
---Trav on 12/2/10


Were those mountain ranges created in the short period during whicch the flood water diasppeared?

If so, the violence would have been enormous, with huge currents and tsunamis.

The Bible is silent on this.
---alan8566_of_UK on 12/2/10


On 12/1/10 Warwick mentioned "the water pouring off the land" as the ocean basins sank and the continents rose. As you would expect, we can see the effects of that in our landscapes. Things like underfit rivers (where the valley was carved by lots of water), planation surfaces (where the surface was shaved off by sheet flow), water gaps (where rivers flow through mountains), etc. These features are hard to explain by slow-and-gradual erosion but easily explained by the effects of receding floodwaters. Noah's Flood was a real event.
---Plagio_Clase on 12/2/10


Warwick .... and all that happened within the space of a few weeks?
---alan8566_of_UK on 12/2/10


Alan Scripture calls it The Flood (mabbul in Hebrew) which is applied to no other flood. Scripture says the whole world was covered to a significant depth above the then mountains. Psalm 104 vs. 6-9 says the waters stood above the mountains but at God's rebuke they went over the mountains, down into the valleys to the place God assigned for them. Obviously they were not there before. We know our oceans have extremely deep basins.

This Scripture shows God created these basins to hold the water pouring off the land. When God created the basins by lowering the ocean floor a natural consequence is the land elsewhere rising. It does not rise uniformly but faster and higher at places of stress such as where plates collide.
---Warwick on 12/1/10


Hi Warwick I have no problem whatoever with sedimentary layers being laid down during a flood ... it seems quite likely in fact.

However, whilst there is a record of Flood in the Bibkle, there is no mention of the violent earth movements which would have occurred if the Himalaya and the Alps and all the other mountain ranges were raised up as the waters receded.

---alan8566_of_uk on 12/1/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Online Stores


Over time many people like 'shocked' have served a proevolution anticreation broadside then sunk without trace when reasonably challenged to defend their assertions.

Hit and run merchants who apparently hold to a belief by blind faith. You cannot blame people for being that way as the proevolution indoctrination is everywhere. Even in churches!

We Christians also hold to our beliefs by faith but not blind faith as these pages show. Countless scientists in all fields (some blog here) believe in Genesis 6 day creation. I know quite a few. If evolution was a proved fact then they could not fail to believe in it. But as it isn't they don't!
---Warwick on 12/1/10


Yes Jack and Warwick I meant micro in terms of speciation.

We all agree
---larry on 12/1/10


The Moderator wrote "Worldwide flood - how do you think there are sea creature fossils on the tops of the highest mountains in the world?"

To which Alan replied "Possibly they were laid down before the cataclymsic movements of the tectonic plates caused the layers to rise up into mountain ranges.'

Alan it is interesting that you use the word 'cataclysmic" as that is the word the Greek NT text uses to describe the flood.

Fossils of sea-bed creatures are found in sedimentary rock on top of mountains. It is consistent with the physical evidence and with Scripture that these mountains and their fossils rose during the flood.
---Warwick on 12/1/10


shocked may be one of those one time bloggers posting, not to enlighten our 'ignorance', but to ridicule it in light of his indoctrination of 'if enough people say it's true, it must be true, not matter whether it is true.'
---micha9344 on 12/1/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Business Training


\\I have no idea why Christians want to distort what God's word actually says. Maybe someone can tell me?
---Warwick on 11/18/10\\

I see it all the time on here. I don't know.

Why ARE you doing this, Warwick?
---Cluny on 11/19/10

Why,do old preachers do this? To protect faulty non witnessed doctrine. To honor cemetary/seminary teachers? Why do they go against Christ,Apostles and Prophets?
To climb in another way into the Sheep Fold.
John 10:1
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.
---TRAV on 12/1/10


You had better be glad, Washington, DC, that you didn't evolve from monkeys. Trying to solve all the world's problems....You would be the greatest fooool.
---catherine on 12/1/10


alan8566_of_uk on 11/29/10 said:
"Possibly they were laid down before the cataclymsic movements of the tectonic plates caused the layers to rise up into mountain ranges."

Cataclysmic movements they were indeed as the oceans sank and the mountains rose and the waters of the Flood flowed off the continents, carving the landscape. Genesis describes the receding water quite graphically.
---Plagio_Clase on 11/30/10


Evolutionary studies may technically fall under the category of science....but without any eye witnesses or reproducable evidence it can't be considered a "hard" science. It is still just a theoretical or "soft" science similar to the study of extraterrestrial life.
---AG on 11/30/10


Locate Church Jobs


I just dont understand how anyone can place their faith in "facts" that constantly change as scientist discover new things that cause them to rethink an ealier theory.
---JackB on 11/30/10


It's not true Science, it's not even Science. the holy bible IS THE ONLY SCIENCE to be taken SERIOUSLY, FOR GOD CANNOT LIE. "In the beginning God created the Heavens and the earth" [GEN. 1:1]. He said it, He proclaimed it. Do you believe God? Or do you believe, SATAN? Your answer will depend on where you spend eternity, my friends.+
---catherine on 11/30/10


Larry Jack is correct. What you wrote about is called micro evolution but in reality is not evolution at all, but adaptation/speciation. Micro evolution concerns small changes within a kind (eg human kind) which some evolutionists speculate add up to become macro changes, given eons of time. There is no evidence to support this belief, let alone proof.
---Warwick on 11/30/10


Shocked: You illustrate the reason for this blog. You loudly proclaim that "evolution is science" and "Bible believers are idiots", but WHERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE? Shurely if "there is alot [sic] of evidence that evolution happened", you should be able to give us a tiny piece of it. And FYI, Warwick and I are very well schooled in ALL the "evidence" for evolution as well as the hard science that disproves it. You have been indoctrinated - not educated.
---jerry6593 on 11/30/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Software


//Creation however is full of macro-evolution including two of the biggest issues facing mankind today - race and language.
---larry on 11/29/10
//

Sir, that is called Micro-evolution not Macro.
---JackB on 11/29/10


Mod: "Worldwide flood - how do you think there are sea creature fossils on the tops of the highest mountains in the world?"

Possibly they were laid down before the cataclymsic movements of the tectonic plates caused the layers to rise up into mountain ranges.


---alan8566_of_uk on 11/29/10



Your reaching Alan...
---larry on 11/29/10


The suggestion of spontaeneous biogenesis ( a bang without a cause that created order instead of chaos) an essential tent pole of evolution is not science and in fact hilariously illogical. Evolution is supression of the truth not science.
Creation however is full of macro-evolution including two of the biggest issues facing mankind today - race and language.
---larry on 11/29/10


Shocked, over the period I have blogged here there have been quite a few comments like yours. People state that evolution is a fact(without defining what they mean by 'evolution') but when challenged to show proof or good evidence rarely have anything substantial to show.

Can I ask you to define what you call evolution and what you believe is the best evidence to support your view? Please be specific.
---Warwick on 11/29/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Advertising


Mod: "Worldwide flood - how do you think there are sea creature fossils on the tops of the highest mountains in the world?"

Possibly they were laid down before the cataclymsic movements of the tectonic plates caused the layers to rise up into mountain ranges.

---alan8566_of_uk on 11/29/10


Shocked, please tell me about the evolution of an eyeball? Worldwide flood - how do you think there are sea creature fossils on the tops of the highest mountains in the world?
---Moderator on 11/29/10


Are you all serious. Have any of you actually gone out and looked at the evidence for evolution, there is alot of evidence that evolution happened. You all are living in ignorance, genesis contradicts more than half of all known natural science, the earth and universe are definitely not 6000 years old, there was definately no world flood, theres not even evidence for the exodus, the bible is about as reliable as any other ancient text.
---Shocked on 11/29/10


Jerry, maybe faith in atheistic evolution is like hiding behind a wall. By that I mean that really coming to grips with God the Creator of the universe is a frightening thing because we by nature want to do things our way. But if God is true then we have to do things His way!

So don't think about it too much and relax in the belief that this whole universe created itself and there is no God. We humans are experts in self-deception.

And faith in theistic evolution is an each way bet. But neither consistent with evolution nor God's word.
---Warwick on 11/25/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Eating Disorders


Warwick: Interesting, isn't it, that many will extoll the scientific veracity of Evolution (even with God's cooperation, as in Theistic Evolution), but not one entry offers any scientific evidence of that veracity. One can only conclude that they "believe" in Evolution by blind faith, and not because of its compelling science.
---jerry6593 on 11/24/10


From long experience I know that many promoters of evolution are not above deceit and manipulation to further their policies.

The word evolution is bandied about as if we all mean the same thing. To confuse the issue certain evolutionists coined the terms micro-evolution, and macro-evolution. They define micro-evolution as the changes we see within a kind. This is not evolution at all but natural selection/speciation. Having defined natural selection/speciation as micro-evolution they then propose that these small changes, given eons of time will lead to large changes such as a reptile evolving into a bird.

Natural selection/speciation happens but is in the opposite direction of supposed evolution of one kind into another.
---Warwick on 11/21/10


Peter: I believe that if Evolution is studied objectively, it will be found to have no more scientific basis than does Astrology.
---jerry6593 on 11/18/10


Like all science, the idea may be changed when further evidence is found.

It is OK to call it science (as in a theory that fits at least some of the observed evidence found so far)

The problem is when we imply that science = truth. Having worked in science for a while, I have seen that that idea is not true, and is in fact used not by scientists but by people tying to USE science to push other to believe something or do something
---Peter on 11/17/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Travel Packages


The Bible seems to be written for ordinary people, not brainiacs. Most of you bloggers already know that scientist have recorded the order of fossil types found at different levels in the earth. The order agrees totally with Genesis. I'm sure all of you know that each layer contains radically different fossils than the previous layer. There are innumerable - missing links - Not just one. This alone destroys any validity regarding evolution. Since earth sciences agree with creation and not evolution, it is only reasonable to accept the biblical explanation. I refuse to worry about the length of time God took to complete the creation. My God could have done it in any six time periods he chose.
---Oldguy on 11/17/10


Theistic Evolution is false science mixed with false religion!
---jerry6593 on 9/11/10


And jerry you won't find any. The biggest lie ever told to humans and they are buying into it, hook, line, and stinker. Ha, Ha, Ha. We, God's people, on the ,has all the proof. Our Creator of heaven and eath lives in us.
---catherine on 9/5/10


I have been asking on this site for several years for someone to provide some scientific evidence that proves - or even suggests - that darwinian Evolution is true. I still haven't seen any.
---jerry6593 on 9/4/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Credit Repair


True science does not violate previously established scientific law - it expands it. Evolution violates established scientific law, not to mention, common sense.
---jerry6593 on 8/17/10


there really is only a temporary truth to reality,aka existance,science also is or has been and will have only a temporary existance.Mans feeble attempts to study his surroundings really amuse me,and his conclusions amuse me even more.
---tom2 on 8/11/10


But to specifically answer you question,evolution is just that a theory,which never has been and never will be proven,God made monkeys ,they have always been monkeys,always will be monkeys,God made man, same answer,nothing ever has evolved from slime into anything but more slime.
---tom2 on 8/10/10


God bless you brother Tom. Well said.
---larry on 8/11/10


'Friendly' there was once a man who walked about with a sandwich board- on the front it said "I am a fool for God." On the rear it said "Whose fool are you?" How would you answer that?

If I be considerd a fool for believing God's word then I will bear that title with pride, and be encouraged!

What I wrote stands as God has clearly and precicely told us what His creation time-frame was-six 24hr days.
---Warwick on 8/11/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Products


friendly blogger,

Uhhh...wow. That's all I got.
---scott on 8/11/10


LOL.. friendly blogger indeed!!!
Maybe someone should think about changing their blog name...hehe..
-I also believe Genesis to be true as written.
Mark 10:6-8 But from the beginning of the creation God made them male and female. For this cause shall a man leave his father and mother, and cleave to his wife, And they twain shall be one flesh: so then they are no more twain, but one flesh.
-It seems like Jesus did as well
Exodus 31:17 It [is] a sign between me and the children of Israel for ever: for [in] six days the LORD made heaven and earth, and on the seventh day he rested, and was refreshed.
-God told Moses the same.
Which books should we take out of the bible that are just folklore and not Truth?
---micha9344 on 8/11/10


Warwick, you are a biblically incompentant fool ...
---Friendly_Blogger on 8/11/10

Now blogger,denoms would make a martyr, name a day,streets after him. Like the commie mlk.
Better,he lays the fields open for seeds of scripture. That the sheep can taste the ancient corn of scriptural witnesses as compared to bread of tares.
Psalm 65:9
Thou visitest the earth, waterest it: thou greatly enrichest it with the river of God, which is full of water: thou preparest them corn, when thou hast so provided for it.
Joel 2:19
Yea, the LORD will answer and say unto his people, Behold, I will send you corn, and wine, and oil,ye shall be satisfied therewith:and I will no more make you a reproach among the heathen:
---Trav on 8/11/10


Warwick, you are a biblically incompentant fool who severed head should be placed on a pike outside of the front door of his church as a object lesson to others. With a sign dangling from your ears saying "I'm Here because I was an Idiot".
---Friendly_Blogger on 8/11/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Divorce


Friendly you wrote "No it simply means that YHWH created the Universe by a method and in time frame not recorded in scripture."

But God did precicely define and record His crreation time-frame in Genesis Chapter 1.

Why do you not believe Him?
---Warwick on 8/10/10


You should take a serious look at what the Flat Earth Society has to say about what the earth is really like. It is fascinating, and scriptural.
---ger.toshav on 8/10/10


all the sciences are the study of man of his surroundings,they are based on observations and provable repeatable tests when conducted always have the same results.Now that being said as BELIEVER I know God is outside of this arena,and actually has the power to eliminate the natural laws which bind all sciences. But to specifically answer you question,evolution is just that a theory,which never has been and never will be proven,God made monkeys ,they have always been monkeys,always will be monkeys,God made man, same answer,nothing ever has evolved from slime into anything but more slime.
---tom2 on 8/10/10


create a river,a canyon evolves....
---kevin on 8/10/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Marriage


All of the different Biblical creation accounts were written when people bereaved the Earth was center of the then known universe, it was flat, it had definite edges and was held up on pillars because this agreed with the scientific beliefs at the time of their recordings. Our modern understanding of science proves these prior notion to be false. Does this in any way diminish Gods creation ability? No it simply means that YHWH created the Universe by a method and in time frame not recorded in scripture. Astronomical events are not totally random and there are only certain DNA double helix combination that work we can relatively accurately measure astronomical time and distances. None of this diminishes God Creation Ability.
---Friendly_Blogger on 8/10/10


Evolution is NOT SCIENCE. Evolution is a ball-face lie. The biggest lie ever told to man-kind. What are you gonna do?
---catherine on 8/10/10


Gav, what you wrote makes sense. People do want to know where they came from. As an aside, it is interesting that Paul in Titus 3:9 says to avoid genaologies as unprofitable and vain.
---ger.toshav on 8/9/10


there is no plain meaning of God's word to contradict.
---atheist on 8/9/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Debt Consolidation


Friendly_Blogger: "A lot more true the the total BS associated with Creationism. The problem with Creationist is that their God is just too small, and they practice the heresy of Biblical Inerrancy for which they all should be burned at the stake. We need to start reviving more old effective customs is dealing with heratics."

I assume that by BS, you mean Bible Scholarship.

Your penchant for burning others at the stake for their faith in God's Word is anything but "friendly."

FYI, it's "heretic" - not "heratic".
---jerry6593 on 8/10/10


The theory of evolution and the thory of a divine creator go hand in hand back through time. However, Time can only be researched back so far before a result is found.
Before christianity and the writing of the bible, there were still believers in gods of varying descriptions. It has been the heart of man that has driven the direction of religous belief.
The aim of man, be he scientist or priest, has always ben to find out just where we came from.
---Gav on 8/9/10


Evolution definitely is not proveable by the scientific method of testability, observability, repeatability.
--Warwick on 8/9/10

Interesting, neither is creation.. Both have to be taken on faith.
---NurseRobert on 8/9/10

In times past certainly, Robert. But, if we take scriptural witnesses....and what is known and it can be seen readily that a "Great Flood" was regional. Killing the lineage of pre Noah but, for him and his own. Noah, perfect in his generations.
If witnesses more than two or three numbering over 1,200 in the form of the word "Erets". faith is substantiated. If one needs more, science,geneology speak again. If more is still.... The Tens of Thousands of specie's.
---Trav on 8/9/10


The problem with Creationist is that their God is just too small, and they practice the heresy of Biblical Inerrancy for which they all should be burned at the stake.
---Friendly_Blogger on 8/9/10

Well, they make an opportunity to state what huff and pufft wolfs cannot tolerate. Truth. They make their living off maintaining the theory's. Sheep looking for grass of Truth will find the pastures. One cannot convert a wolf into a sheep. But, one can point the safe pasture the Shepherd guards. Have fun wolf hunting.
Psalm 24:6
This is the generation of them that seek him, that seek thy face, O Jacob. Selah.
---Trav on 8/9/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Refinancing


Nurse Robert you are correct and if you have followed my blogs I have happily admitted that many times.

What it means though (contrary to what many evolutionists claim) is that the evolutionary hypothesis does not in any way, nor can it, disprove the plain meaning of Scripture especially God's account of creation.

People need to know that. They also need to know that the available evidence favours Biblical creation over evolution. Sadly many Christians have uncritically accepted evolution as fact and become Theistic Evolutionists, to their loss. The idea that our God would use such a wasteful death process as evolution to create is an insult to God.
---Warwick on 8/9/10


Evolution definitely is not proveable by the scientific method of testability, observability, repeatability.
--Warwick on 8/9/10

Interesting, neither is creation.. Both have to be taken on faith.
---NurseRobert on 8/9/10


Warwick and Atheist, what each of you wrote is thoughtful and interesting. Keep up the good work!
---ger.toshav on 8/9/10


"The honest scientist...will tell you that nothing whatever can be or has been proved with fully 100% certainty, not even that you or I exist....there is no sharp line between speculation, hypothesis, theory, principle, and fact, but only a difference along a sliding scale, in the degree of probability of the idea. When we say a thing is a fact...we only mean that its probability is an extremely high one.... and not bothered by doubt. Now in this use of the term fact...evolution is a fact....evidence in favor of it is as voluminous, diverse, and convincing as...other well established fact of science... regarding existence of things that cannot be directly seen, such as atoms, neutrons, or solar gravitation ....- H. J. Muller
---atheist on 8/9/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Franchises


It all depends upon how you define 'science.' Evolution definitely is not proveable by the scientific method of testability, observability, repeatability. How can you put the idea that lifeless chemicals became alive, to any such test? Obviously you cannot as this event is claimed to have happened in the distant distant past, and is not happening today.

If evolution were true science then it could be proved or disproved by the methods of science and it cannot.

Scientifically speaking it is not a theory, but an hypothesis, an untestable belief about the past.

It is clear that evolutionary ideas have no scientific standing to contradict the plain meaning of God's word.
---Warwick on 8/9/10


they practice the heresy of Biblical Inerrancy for which they all should be burned at the stake.

We need to start reviving more old effective customs is dealing with heratics.
---Friendly_Blogger on 8/9/10

the hypothesis of de-evolution.

Crack that whip
Give the past the slip
Step on a crack
Break your Momma's back

When a problem comes along
You must whip it
Before the cream sits out too long
You must whip it
When something's goin' wrong
You must whip it
---aka on 8/9/10


Is the evolutionary hypothesis science?

I would say YES
Comparative anatomy
Taxonomy
carbon dating
All good science, wrong conclusion though.
---francis on 8/9/10


I don't quite understand the question. How does one define "true science"?
---ger.toshav on 8/9/10


Read These Insightful Articles About Lead Generation


No!! It is strictly theory!! And unsustainable theory at that. It is impossible to argue evolution or any theory without a starting point. And that's starting point(the beginning of evolution has never been found.

Some very brilliant minds adhere to the evolution theory and they are but examples of human reasoning bumping up against the wall of knowledge that belongs to Almighty God.
---mima on 8/9/10


"they practice the heresy of Biblical Inerrancy for which they all should be burned at the stake."
Because I believe in Biblical inerrancy I thought this judgment to be a little harsh.
---mima on 8/9/10


Friendly Blogger ... "The problem with Creationist is that their God is just too small"

I can't see how the belief that God made the whole Universe, and mere Man makes Him too small.

That applies whether we believe He did it in 144 hours, or over billions of years.
---alan8566_of_uk on 8/9/10


Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.