ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Are Parts Of Evolution True

Can anyone name one thing that they personally know about Evolution that is true?

Join Our Free Chat and Take The Evolution Bible Quiz
 ---jerry6593 on 7/25/11
     Helpful Blog Vote (2)

Post a New Blog



\\For evolution to take place you must have an unorganized simple species evolve to reemerge as an organized more complex species.\\

Paul, what you're saying is not true.

A single-celled organism is VERY complex.

If you're going to try to argue against evolution on scientific grounds, make sure you know what the theory says first. Apparently you don't know.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/29/11


For evolution to take place you must have an unorganized simple species evolve to reemerge as an organized more complex species.

Which their,in my opinion, is not any supporting evidence of.

Mild mutations and species enhancements are not evolution.

And I sure don't see it here,

Ge 1:27 So God created man in His own image, in the image of God He created him, male and female He created them.

And If were evolved in His image then what did He evolve from? I speak as a man
---paul on 7/29/11


---jerry6593 Why can't crocodilians eat grass? Is that not what God created them to eat?
Why do bees have venum? What possible use could venum be to them in Eden?
---Francis on 7/29/11


Leslie:

You said According to the Bible, if it is NOT mentioned in the Bible, it is a LIE. Also, a half-truth is still a whole-lie.

Could you please cite chapter and verse please? Because if not, then the above statement is itself a lie.

John 21:25
"And there are also many other things which Jesus did, the which, if they should be written every one, I suppose that even the world itself could not contain the books that should be written. Amen."

Are those things that Jesus did also a lie, because they aren't written down in the Bible? I hope not!
---StrongAxe on 7/29/11


Francis: "MICRO EVOLUTION IS TRUE"

NO, IT'S NOT! What people call "micro evolution" is actually mendellian genetic variation or selective breeding, etc. It is the expression of the full spectrum of physical possibilities within the genome. It is the reason your children all look different, that blue-eyed children are born to brown-eyed parents, and that distinctive breeds of dogs and horses are possible, but it is not the creation of any new or distinct species.

What most people call adaptation of a species is actually the extinction of the less genetically robust members of the group, giving the "appearance" of a group change without a change in the genome.
---jerry6593 on 7/29/11




Sometimes we get confused by terminology.

The creation of a different species is not evolution but mostly a loss or minor change in genetic information causing creatures within a 'kind' lose the ability to interbreed. This makes them different species but no new unique genetic information has arisen so no evolution has occurred.

Humans and dogs are one 'kind' and one species, as all varieties can interbreed. However some arctic terns appear identical, still of the bird 'kind', have lost the ability to interbreed so are a different species, but still bird 'kind.' They are not becoming a new 'kind.'

If evolution were true we would see the emergence of completely different 'kinds' of creatures. But we don't.
---Warwick on 7/29/11


But there is ANOTHER species,

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/28/11


More accurately put, there is another breed for the species is a fish which has not changed or evolved.
It has through necessity adapted to its environment for the sake of survival.

Again I dont see evolution taking place in the World, evolution being one species transforming into a completely different species or being, which is what the theory of evolution declares happened to us.

More often then not I see a particularly species taking on mutational changes allowing it to operate differently in an environment but operate as its original species with modifications or adaptations.

Paul
---paul on 7/29/11


Steveng, indeed i wasn't there andindeed every lecturor has another point he/she wants to eludicate, its their daily bread. i have known a lecturer( not personally again)upon a question about the possibilty of creation who stated there's a 50/50 chance christianity is right, but it seems more logically to accept evolution, another evolutionist stated we are not here to discuss who did it, we are here to see how it happened. to me these two are worthy of attention. STILL I ACCEPT THE LITERAL VERSION OF THE BIBLE.
---andy3996 on 7/29/11


Peter - The Bible DOES mention ALL humans being born (Jeremiah 1:5 - before I formed you in the womb, I knew you).
---Leslie on 7/28/11


paul, I've done some cursory research on the subject of blind fish.

There are two different species of them.

One, A. mexicanus will grow skin over its eyes if it lives in a lightless environment, but does not do so it it lives elsewhere.

But there is ANOTHER species, A. jordani, that is always found in a lightless environment, and always remains blind.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/28/11




andy3996: "In other words, he evaded my question.
NO, The lecturer was admitting they are not sure,.."

There is always something missing from writing that you don't get from being there in person - the way he said it, the body language, etc. I wasn't the only person who noticed that he was evading the question. Actually, no scientist who believe that we are all mutants have not figured a good answer from the question (at least since I stopped asking it a few years ago. Even some of the students I've talked with after the lecture.
---Steveng on 7/28/11


Leslie 'According to the Bible, if it is NOT mentioned in the Bible, it is a LIE'

That is ridiculous!!!!!

The fact you, Leslie, was born is not mentioned in the Bible

Does that mean the fact you were born IS A LIE

YOU SAID SO!!!!!
---Peter on 7/28/11


According to the Bible, if it is NOT mentioned in the Bible, it is a LIE. Also, a half-truth is still a whole-lie.
---Leslie on 7/28/11


The Theory of Evolution (scientifically not a Theory but hypothesis-lower order) is not about so-misscalled micro-evolution. This is better called natural selection or speciation. This has never been shown to produce the massive amounts of new unique genetic information needed to turn one 'kind' of creature into another.

For one tiny example the human blood-clotting process is effected by a cascade of 100+ chemicals. Each reaction has to occur in only one specific order or we bleed to death. How could all the new specific genetic information behind this come about by anything other than a Creator God?

Atheist claims one 'kind' of creature has not evolved into another. Then from what did the dog kind originally evolve?
---Warwick on 7/28/11


it depends what i defined as evolution, there was an evolutionist who said "its only one small step further that everything evolved from nothing. so this evolutionist was very close to creation, frankly every thesis has so many postions that if you say something is true then you'l have to explain who's vision in that declaration you hang on to
---andy3996 on 7/28/11


Can anyone name one thing that they personally know about Evolution that is true?
---francis on 7/28/11

It is a Theory.

This is true.
---Trav on 7/28/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Dedicated Hosting


Can anyone name one thing that they personally know about Evolution that is true?

MICRO EVOLUTION IS TRUE
---francis on 7/28/11


Well put Steveng. This is why I tell those who have nonBiblical views of Genesis that they do not get them from Scripture.

One Christian told me he could not accept God's account of creation because he believed scientists had proved this could not happen. Interestingly though he was adamant Jesus rose bodily from the dead. But those same scientists say this cannot happen!

Selective faith.
---Warwick on 7/28/11


"The lecturer:We are not sure...but something happened during these parts of the evolution chart.

In other words, he evaded my question.
NO, The lecturer was admitting they are not sure, if someone is genuine, that person is worthy of attention. if someone asks me and why did God.... and i dont know, it is in my best interest to admit it. but more often as christians we play the devil's lawyer, based on iduno"s we defend the truth, making our case to seem ridiculous before the outsider. do i believe Creation literally? yes do i reject other vieuws, only the ones that exclude God completely.
God is Great
---andy3996 on 7/28/11


A theist: Blah, blah, blah... More talk, but you still have not named a single thing about Evolution that is true. And you never will, because none exist.

This question is not original with me, but was asked by Colin Patterson, senior paleontologist at the British Museum of Natural History at his keynote address to the American Museum of Natural History in New York in 1981. He got the same answer as I'm getting - COMPLETE SILENCE! Except for one individual who broke the long silence with "I know that it shouldn't be taught in High School."
---jerry6593 on 7/28/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Online Marketing


\\This fish will genetically pass this adapted DNA on to its offspring thus allowing for adaptation to take place.

Though it will generate a mutation it will remain the same species not evolving into a new creature but adapting to its environment for survival sake.\\

But what you're describing is evolution. Don't you get it?

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/28/11


Warwick,

The opposite of "chance" is "planned" therefore there is a god.

You are seriously hopeless.
---atheist on 7/27/11

He actually has hope.....where you have none at your present state.
Even if the "puffed up" doesn't understand it enough to explain it.

Oh, i realize you "hope" they find the lizchicken fossil that turned into a million extinctions.
Even if they do, Trexlizchicken is a poor substitute for what is already established and proven. By us, by the witnesses before us.

Acts 2:32
This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are witnesses.
---Trav on 7/28/11


And the sum of all these adapations over generations is guess what? Evolution!

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/27/11

Not necessarily,

Take a fish who has been subjected to total darkness due to being born inside of a mountain spring deep inside the mountain.

This fish will not nor has ever seen the light of day.

Therefore his sight has been retarded and his other senses heightened in a compensatory manner.

This fish will genetically pass this adapted DNA on to its offspring thus allowing for adaptation to take place.

Though it will generate a mutation it will remain the same species not evolving into a new creature but adapting to its environment for survival sake.

---paul on 7/27/11


Cluny adaptations only bring about variety within a kind. They do not create the massive amouts of unique and specific information to turn one kind into another!
---Warwick on 7/27/11


Shop For Christian Colleges


Atheist,

Because if you go and look at the proposed evolutionary ancestry tree in academic textbooks you'll see that the branches are mostly dotted lines i.e. they don't have any evidence of ancestors.

The ''ancient'' fossil record e.g. the Burgess Shale, demonstrates, on an evolutionary interpretation, that life suddenly came into existence, fully formed and highly complex.

Your reply demonstrates that no evidence is evidence.
---Marc on 7/27/11


\\So what theory do you subscribe to, If you would indulge me with a brief description.\\

What I've always said--that God works through natural processes that He Himself established.

\\A mutation that is likely or probable typically is thought of as an adaptation as opposed to an act of evolution according to my thought process. \\

What you're saying is you don't understand the theory of evolution.

\\Adaptation is the original subject undergoing change not to re-identify itself but to adjust to a particular environment or situation.

I see adaptation but not evolution.\\

And the sum of all these adapations over generations is guess what? Evolution!

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/27/11


Here was my question during a question and answer session after an evolution seminar at Cal Tech in Pasadena Calif in the mid 1980s:

Me: "You [the lecturer] said that each one of us is a mutation of one sort of another. What are the chances that two completely different mutations, a male and a female, so perfectly copulate to bring children into this world?"

The Lecturer: (after the laughter died down and my embarrassement subsided) "We are not sure at this point in time, but something happened during these parts of the evolution chart (pointing to blank parts of a long chart spread across the stage)...

In other words, he evaded my question.
---Steveng on 7/27/11


The reason many of you cannot see the Genesis account of creation as not literal is because you are attempting to find common ground between science and the bible. On one hand, you cannot find fault from very knowledgeable scientists having "foolproof" evidence using high tech equipment to measure the age of the earth and universe. On the other hand, you carry a doubt that what you see as a very complex creation by just looking around you that the bible is somehow flawed, limited, incomplete, or misinterpreted.

If you question the literal account of creation, how many other parts of the bible do you question?
---Steveng on 7/27/11


Read These Insightful Articles About VoIP Service


I still don't understand what all the hullabaloo is about. It's just absurd. :-)
---John.usa on 7/27/11


Warwick,

The opposite of "chance" is "planned" therefore there is a god.

You are seriously hopeless.
---atheist on 7/27/11


Cluny


So what theory do you subscribe to, If you would indulge me with a brief description.

A mutation that is likely or probable typically is thought of as an adaptation as opposed to an act of evolution according to my thought process.

For something to adapt to an environment is some what predictable or likely, whereas evolution theoretically, by nature is random

For something to evolve indicates the original subject is reprocessing itself by undergoing transformation great or small which re-defines its original form.

Adaptation is the original subject undergoing change not to re-identify itself but to adjust to a particular environment or situation.

I see adaptation but not evolution.
---paul on 7/27/11


Atheist - Once again you and Cluny go with your own personal opinions rather than the Bible. Your opinions will ALWAYS be FLAWED if not lined up with the Bible. Here is a test for you to prove this: Spell Cop, Spell Flop, now what do you do at a green light? If you said stop, you are wrong, because at a green light you go. This proves how flawed our own beliefs are compared to the Bible. Also, the shirt you are wearing, how did it come to be? Did it just appear out of nowhere? If you said no, but you say that the world and humans appeared out of nowhere, you are WRONG.
---Leslie on 7/27/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Settlements


Marc,

There are estimated to be millions of species that are now extinct, that we will probably never even know about. How does that matter?
---atheist on 7/27/11


From a sample of 1000 individuals listed in American Men and Women of Science. 1998. Doubt if there have been many converts since then.



GALLUP EVOLUTION QUESTIONS

Question Scientists Public
1. Special Creation, 10 000 years 5% 46%
2. Evolution, God Guided 40% 40%
3. Evolution, God had no part 55% 9%
---atheist on 7/27/11


Atheist, you say "Evolutionary theory does not rely on pure chance." You play with words. In the evolutionary philosophy there is no designer therefore evolution must proceed via totally naturalistic processes which themselves must have come into action without a designer. This is all chance.

The opposite of 'chance' is 'planned' look it up. No designer, no plan=chance.

I have asked you to explain to we poor confused religious souls what the "current evolutionary theory" is. But you don't. I don't think you know what it is. I do!
---Warwick on 7/27/11


Trav, the answer is an egg laying animal that lived and is now extinct that lived before birds and dinosaurs.
---atheist on 7/27/11

So this animal laid some eggs and went extinct. These eggs turned into Roosters and hens? Laying more eggs etc, etc.
These were the "Good" eggs right?
Nah....even you secretly don't believe that.
You need proof....nothing wrong with that. Doubting Thomas and Trav did too. Look for it yourself....no one else has answers to your questions.

Isa 7:10 Moreover the LORD spake again unto Ahaz, saying,

11Ask thee a sign of the LORD thy God, ask it either in the depth, or in the height above.

12But Ahaz said, I will not ask, neither will I tempt the LORD.
---Trav on 7/27/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Internet Services


Atheist, who 'fears' evolution?

When you write such nonsense I think of the Nobel Prize winning professor of Chemistry (bucky ball man) Dr Rick Smalley-non Christian.

A Creationist speaker at his university challenged him to reinvestigate the evolutionary 'theory' and He discovered it was 'bad science.' This lead to his conversion to Christianity.

Why would anyone fear a philosophy which cannot be proved or disproved by the scientific method. This alone shows it is not a scientific theory at all.

What people fear are the social consequences of evolution being taught as fact-racism, violence and social decay.
---Warwick on 7/27/11


''[P]aleontologists are equally concerned with puzzling out how these mighty beasts got their start. Who were their ancestors?...Tracing the origins of the earliest dinosaurs has been a major challenge for paleontologists because there are no uncontested fossils from their earliest days on Earth.'' ('Science', v. 331, p. 134, 2011)

What? I thought we had the history of dinosaurs all worked out. Apparently we don't. Hey, Atheist: I bet you you didn't know that!

Oh well, evolution of dinosaurs must still be true.
---Marc on 7/27/11


\\ and that until recently most scientists believed in god\\

Are you daring to say that most scientists today do NOT believe in God?

How did you come to this conclusion, atheist?

And I'm very serious when I ask this question: What do you mean by "scientist" in this context?

Physicians, after all, are scientists, are they not?

Or do you just reject anyone who believes in some deity out of hand as not being a true scientist?

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/27/11


Scott,

Given that more than half of the people in the world believe in god, and that until recently most scientists believed in god, why wouldn't the theory of evolution be debunked or at least altered, if the evidence were there, to go along with god theory. What is the motivation to go against what most people believe? Why would there be such a bias? Who would orchestrate such a conspiracy? If the god speaking into existence thing could be worked into the theory, why wouldn't it be there, if there was evidence.

Trav, the answer is an egg laying animal that lived and is now extinct that lived before birds and dinosaurs.
---atheist on 7/27/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Online Stores


3)If the theory were flawed, peer reviewed studies would reveal those flaws.

I wish it were the case but scientific bias in the study of evolution has greatly distorted the evidence. Most of the macro evolution you learned in high school biology has been proven false. The material just fits nicely together and scientist wanted it to work. However, it would be hard to rewrite the text books not to mention the uproar of people saying that "Christian conservatives are taking away evolution for creationism." Other ideas like heavy objects fall faster than light objects was first theorized in ancient Greece but not changed until Newton. Assuming no air resistance. Scott is now Scott1
---Scott1 on 7/27/11


I know that many, but not all Christians, fear the theory because it disrupts the confused creation story of genesis.
---atheist on 7/26/11

We and i don't fear the "theory" because of the defining key word "theory".

When evolution can elaborate intelligently on Chicken and the egg then things will clear up a little.

Takes an Egg to make a Chicken right Atheist? Chicken to make an egg. Throw in a Rooster to fertilize the egg.
Which came first atheist?

A. GOD
B. Rooster
C. Chicken
d. Egg
e. Lizards
f. Atheist
g. Feathers
h. Chicken feed

Pass this question and we'll give you an break, before going on to Woodpecker.
---Trav on 7/27/11


Warwick and Jerry, Please provide the peer reviewed science studies that explain the process by which god spoke everything into existence. The nothing to everything by god speaking theory. A few details...
---atheist on 7/27/11


\\Obviously you subscribe to the gap theory which is not supported by scriptures either\\

No, it's not obvious, because I don't.

Try again.

\\And for a mutation to be probable and likely it is more accurately an adaptation, not an evolution.\\

But that's EXACTLY what the theory of evolution says: that the mutations/adaptations that are useful are inherited by succeeding generations!

Basically, I was taught that evolution means an orderly system of development from simpler to more complex (only you said "perfect") forms.

This is exactly the pattern in Genesis 1.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/27/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Business Training


1) Fundamentalist bible literalists are afraid of the theory of evolution (fearing the truth of it will collapse their theology) and misstate it often.
2)They say it is base on random chance, like the chance of a 747 being blown together in a hurricane. The theory has nothing to do with random chance. This is nonsense.
3)If the theory were flawed, peer reviewed studies would reveal those flaws.
---atheist on 7/27/11


A theist: All those irrelevant words, but still never addressing the question at hand. You seem to believe yourself to be a knowlegable evolutionist, yet you are unable to name a single thing about Evolution that you know to be true. Strange!

I believe that you can't name a single thing because there is nothing about Evolution that is actually true. It is a creation account for you atheists founded upon the twin pillars of conjecture and fraud. C'mon. PROVE me wrong. Come up with something true.
---jerry6593 on 7/27/11


Warwick: "Atheist I don't think you have a clue what the "current evolutionary theory" holds to be true."

I am certain that you do not know what current evolutionary theory is, because it certainly has nothing to do with pure chance. Got that? Evolutionary theory does not rely on pure chance.

I think you have a bigger challenge explaining how "god" spoke things into existence. Just cut to the end. You believe because you chose to believe. And in the end you will discount anything that I or anyone else presents as evidence contrary to your beliefs, so there is no discussion to be had.

The religious beliefs of people is irrelevant to the truth of any fact or theory.
---atheist on 7/26/11


Cluny

Obviously you subscribe to the gap theory which is not supported by scriptures either
And for a mutation to be probable and likely it is more accurately an adaptation, not an evolution.
As for our Savior being a descendant of dirt, that is totally scriptural and I find great pride in the fact that my ancestry is designed as such from the creator, Father God.

Why is it so hard for you to believe that God created man and woman instantaneously and they just were?

Paul
---paul on 7/26/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Software


NurseRobert said: "Haz, you can't prove that the Biblical story of creation is true either."

True.
But my point is that evolution is pushed as fact when it is really a faith belief and a dead-end one at that.
---Haz27 on 7/26/11


Haz, you can't prove that the Biblical story of creation is true either.
---NurseRobert on 7/26/11


Nurse
Other than the sociological aspect of the account being handed down from generation to generation.

And other than the archeological finds that substantiate the life and times of Gods people leading up to the period of the event which places them in the region.

Not to mention the fact that we have an account called the Holy Bible which depicts the account quite adequately.

Other than the same criteria being met that quantifies any other ancient society or event, your absolutely correct.
Their seems to be no evidence of creation what so ever.

Paul
---paul on 7/27/11


Interesting that evolution is accepted as fact by many in science and some here on CN but there is nothing that they can show to prove it to be true.
---Haz27 on 7/26/11

Haz, you can't prove that the Biblical story of creation is true either.
---NurseRobert on 7/26/11


Atheist I don't think you have a clue what the "current evolutionary theory" holds to be true.

But let me be magnanamous: please explain how the "current evolutionary theory" explains how the cat, dog, bird and fish kind, for example came about.

For one example, what was the ancestor of the dog?

BTW I wrote about a Scientist who is Christian and you rejected his expertise because he is a Christian.

Do you know of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging diagnostic tool? If so do you know it was invented by Dr Raymond Damadian? Is he a true scientist or not?
---Warwick on 7/26/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Advertising


Why are so many people around here continually so exercised about evolution? It is just so irrelevant with regard to what Jesus has done for us. :-)
---John.usa on 7/26/11


\\Cluny

If we indeed evolved from a sub prime species to a more adapt specimen then why are we still so imperfect?

Why did evolution stop

Find the highest corner of the ship Cluny, your theory is taking on water.\\

Two things, Paul:

1. I never said that I believed in Darwinian evolution. I have several times repudiated the notion that mutations are chance and random. So can you tell me what my theory really is?

2. If you want to believe that you--and by extension, our Lord, God, and Savior Jesus Christ--are descended from a lump of dirt, go ahead.

Slava Iisusu Khristu!
---Cluny on 7/26/11


Warwick: "The term 'microbe-to-man evolution was coined to specify the specific evolutionary story which says life originally came about by chance random processes. And further that this original life form evolved into all the different kinds which have existed and still exist. Again by chance random (naturalistic as opposed to supernatural) processes.

Nothing about this story is true."

Finally we agree!

--- as nothing you described has anything to do with current evolutionary theory.
---atheist on 7/26/11


What do we call evolution? It's important!

Some chages have occurred, but do they count as evolution? We have more people with some chronic diseases, as the people who get them when they are young now can have children, and if the disease is genetic, that means more people will have it

But IS IT EVOLUTION?

Probably no
---Peter on 7/26/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Eating Disorders


The term 'evolution' is very vague. The car-maker, Volvo, talks about the evolution of its products. This of course is not evolution but intelligent design, hopefully.

The term 'microbe-to-man evolution was coined to specify the specific evolutionary story which says life originally came about by chance random processes. And further that this original life form evolved into all the different kinds which have existed and still exist. Again by chance random (naturalistic as opposed to supernatural) processes.

Nothing about this story is true.
---Warwick on 7/26/11


Leslie, Your statement is flat out false. That is all there is to it. where did you get this nonsense?

Paul, Evolutionary theory does not try to explain how living things changed from "less than perfect" to "perfect." It only attempts to explain why living things change and adapt so they can live long enough to reproduce. Why do you think that evolution has stopped? The continual failure of new insecticides and antibiotics to kill their targets proves that insects and bacteria are still evolving.

Please, out of respect for Cluny and myself, remember we are two different people with different beliefs. Any beliefs about science he may hold do not mean we share the same religious beliefs.
---atheist on 7/26/11


Interesting that evolution is accepted as fact by many in science and some here on CN but there is nothing that they can show to prove it to be true.

This only proves that evolution is a faith and a dead-end one at that.
---Haz27 on 7/26/11


Cluny

If we indeed evolved from a sub prime species to a more adapt specimen then why are we still so imperfect?

Why did evolution stop

Find the highest corner of the ship Cluny, your theory is taking on water.

Evolution smacks of Eves temptation to be as gods.
---paul on 7/26/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Travel Packages


Cluny & Atheist - Once again, you both are WRONG and claim that you know more than God, which is idolatry.
---Leslie on 7/26/11


Leslie: "Scientists discovered that how the evolutions came to the conclution that man came from apes, is because they took a skull of a human and attached it to an ape body, since they are so simalar in shape."

That is simply not true.
---atheist on 7/26/11


\\ Scientists discovered that how the evolutions came to the conclution that man came from apes, is because they took a skull of a human and attached it to an ape body, since they are so simalar in shape.\\

Are you aware that NO evolutionist says that Homo sapiens came evolved from apes, Leslie? (I will admit that this is a widespread misconception, but that doesn't make it true.)

You're using a straw man argument.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/26/11


the only part that's true about EVOLUTION is the missing link (ITS MISSING, so it isn't there)
---andy3996 on 7/26/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Credit Repair


NOTHING in evolution is true, infact evolution has been PROVEN FALSE. Scientists discovered that how the evolutions came to the conclution that man came from apes, is because they took a skull of a human and attached it to an ape body, since they are so simalar in shape. The computer you are typing on had to come from somewhere (it did not just appear out of nowhere), the computer maker made it. You see humans and nature, and you know that someone made them. Here is a cute quote: The Big Bang Theory, God said it, and bang it happened.
---Leslie on 7/26/11


God's time is not like our time.A day to God is like a 1000 of our years.God is eternal guys.That said no I don't think evolution is evolving.God made both apes and man.People are taller on the average because nutrition is better but we still look human.
---shirley on 7/26/11


There is survival of the fittest, though I can't say this has ever given rise to a new species. And there is natural selection, but I can't scientifically prove this has ever given rise to a new species.

According to the scientific method, an idea can't be more than a hypothesis unless repeatable tests show it should be a theory. So, evolution is not a theory . . . according to standards of the scientific method. And if evolution can't be tested by the scientific method, I guess it isn't even a scientific hypothesis.

How long did it take God to resurrect Jesus or to heal a body? It does not take God long to do a creative thing. So, did He even need each whole day for each part of creation? I guess He decided to take His time! (c:
---Bill_willa6989 on 7/26/11


\\Glory to the REAL Jesus Christ!\\

Is your "real Jesus Christ" the same one that Elder James White believed in and is taught in your Revelation Seminars?

Slava Iisusu Khristu!
---Cluny on 7/26/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Products


I know this to be true about evolution at its very best it is but a "theory" and why someone would give a theory more credit than the word of God simply escapes me.
---mima on 7/26/11


Now atheist, be serious, between creation and evolution the most confused is evolution. evolution is only a theory but evolutionists hold it as gospeltruth. do you know that every new breakthough outdates another foundation of evolution? could you tell me how many hypothesis exist upon the big bang, or could you tell me how many dates are given as possible begining of the universe. about every MAJOR university of naturual sience has yet another one. basically, i don't care about evolution yes or no, what i care about is the dishonnest manner of defending it. if evolutionists would be willing to admit their errors, i believe it would be more acceptable as science.
---andy3996 on 7/26/11


The keyword in that question is personally, meaning by own experience.

I know that Jerry is obsessed with asking that question about evolution. That is one thing I know personally for sure about evolution theory. I know that many, but not all Christians, fear the theory because it disrupts the confused creation story of genesis. I know that many Christians do accept the theory and are embarrassed by the insistence of other Christian's that "true Christians" cannot believe it.
---atheist on 7/26/11


Cluny: "Unlike you, jerry, I'm willing to allow God as much time as He wishes to take to create things."

That's nice of you. Why then don't you "allow" Him to do it in six normal week days and rest the seventh, as He commanded you. Is it because YOU are in charge and not Him?

Why don't you answer the blog question?

Glory to the REAL Jesus Christ!
---jerry6593 on 7/26/11


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Divorce


Animals will change slightly to survive and adapt to their environment. Example camels can carry lots of water in their humps. Sharks have teeth that fall out after becoming dull. However through evolution they have many more teeth. Micro evolution works when an animal trait gains a small advantage (longer neck, more teeth, larger horns, speed) over other animal traits of its species such that the genes of the advantage animal survives longer than the disadvantage animal over numerous generations. This is natural selection. Scientist have done test in labs on bacteria that change to better survive in an environment over a series of days. Scott is now Scott1
---Scott1 on 7/26/11


Not if you believe God created them man and woman instantly as the Bible declares.

Paul
---paul on 7/25/11


Unlike you, jerry, I'm willing to allow God as much time as He wishes to take to create things.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/25/11


Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.