ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Michael Jackson A Christian

From what we know of Michael Jackson's life, was he a Christian? A plain ol' Jehovah Witness? Or could he be classified as having been a Satanist?

Join Our Christian Chat and Take The Cults Bible Quiz
 ---Gordon on 5/28/13
     Helpful Blog Vote (7)

Post a New Blog



Is it not possible that someone has bad grammar and spelling just because they are stupid?

It is also possible, is it not?
---Jennifer on 6/12/13


I never said it isn't possible that someone has poor gramar and spelling because they are stupid. But poor gramar and spelling is not an indication of stupidity. Some scientists and mathemiticians are so intelligent that they focus on more complicated matters rather than waste time and energy on something as easy and trivial as gramar and punctuation. English teachers go around correcting other people's gramar like they're smarter than everyone else when in reality they are so dumb the only thing they can excell at is English.
---Jed on 6/12/13


Jed: 'Most genius scientists and mathematicians have terrible grammar and spelling'

Whether that is true or not I can't say, but could it be.....

Is it not possible that someone has bad grammar and spelling just because they are stupid?

It is also possible, is it not?
---Jennifer on 6/12/13


"...your claim that someone's grammar or spelling is reflective of their overall intelligence or understanding of a specific subject is utter nonsense. Your constant calling people out for their poor grammar or spelling is an obvious evasion tactic to distract from the fact that you are actually ignorant on the subject being discussed. The comical part is that you were actually the one lecturing wrongly and just got schooled."
---Jed on 6/9/13


Now, now Jed! Let's not pull on Cluny's ol' goatee! :D
---Leon on 6/12/13


Apparently, Jed cannot tell the difference between non-standard spelling and grammar (something that used to be taught in elementary school) on the one hand and clear writing and thinking on the other.

But that is not surprising.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/10/13


How many "genius scientists and mathemeticians" do you personally know, Jed?

Or have you examined enough of them to form a valid statistical sample that would prove your statement reliable?
---Cluny on 6/9/13


I know quite a few, actually. Nonetheless, your claim that someone's grammar or spelling is reflective of their overall intelligence or understanding of a specific subject is utter nonsense. Your constant calling people out for their poor grammar or spelling is an obvious evasion tactic to distract from the fact that you are actually ignorant on the subject being discussed. The comical part is that you were actually the one lecturing wrongly and just got schooled.
---Jed on 6/9/13




\\Most genius scientists and mathematicians have terrible grammar and spelling.\\

How many "genius scientists and mathemeticians" do you personally know, Jed?

Or have you examined enough of them to form a valid statistical sample that would prove your statement reliable?

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/9/13


Writing clearly means thinking clearly.

Thinking clearly is a sign of maturity.
---Cluny on 6/9/13


Neither of those statements are at all true. Most genius scientists and mathematicians have terrible grammar and spelling. Yet I'm quite sure they know what they are talking about.
---Jed on 6/9/13


\\Who cares? If that's really what you are concerned about in these blogs then you obviously are not mature enough to handle a real conversation about Christianity.
---Jed on 6/8/13\\

Writing clearly means thinking clearly.

Thinking clearly is a sign of maturity.

It is possible to have a conversation about anything only with those who DO think clearly.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/9/13


Still "evangelizing of the Gospel" is a needless and repetitious redundant tautology.
---Cluny on 6/8/13


Who cares? If that's really what you are concerned about in these blogs then you obviously are not mature enough to handle a real conversation about Christianity.
---Jed on 6/8/13


\\"Evangelos" is the Greek equivalent for the word "Evangelist", it means "a messenger of good news".\\

I admit I put the wrong ending, and should have said "evangelion."

Still "evangelizing of the Gospel" is a needless and repetitious redundant tautology.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/8/13




\\"evangelizing of the Gospel"?\\

Since the English word "Gospel" is the equivalent of the Greek word "evangelos," "evangelizing of the Gospel" means "Gospelling of the Gospel," which is sheer nonsense.
---Cluny on 6/7/13


Nope. Again, you're trying to sound smart but you just make yourself look like a total idiot.

The Greek word "evangelos" does NOT mean "gospel". "Evangelos" is the Greek equivalent for the word "Evangelist", it means "a messenger of good news". The Greek equivalent for "gospel" is "euangelion" which means "good message".
---Jed on 6/7/13


\\"evangelizing of the Gospel"?\\

Since the English word "Gospel" is the equivalent of the Greek word "evangelos," "evangelizing of the Gospel" means "Gospelling of the Gospel," which is sheer nonsense.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/7/13


\\ Right before he died, was he testifying of JESUS or "evangelizing of the Gospel"?\\

Why would he have done that if he had become a mahometan in 1908?

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/7/13


I don't claim to be the Divine Judge of all. GOD alone is Judge of all mankind. All I am doing is believing the Lord when He says that by a person's fruits you shall know them! MATTHEW 7:20. It's as Shira and Leon attested. LUKE 6:45 says that from what's in a person's heart will their mouth speak. That would also apply to one's actions. Who can give witness that Michael Jackson was a "humble servant of GOD" when he danced and sang in a sexually and sensuously explicit manner? Is that from GOD? It seems MJ was all about promoting MJ, up 'til his dying breath. Right before he died, was he testifying of JESUS or "evangelizing of the Gospel"? We do know that he was prepping himself for his "World comeback".
---Gordon on 6/7/13


we know a tree by the fruit it bears. don't need to judge anyone, just watch the fruits.
there are many pretenders in the world so we must stand as a light because someone is watching our life.
---shira4368 on 6/6/13


"Love.wins, Are you just being naive? The Lord Yahushua (Jesus) tells us to judge with righteous judgment, JOHN 7:24b, so, therefore it must be possible."
---Gordon on 6/6/13


If I may add, righteous judgment is reserved only to God. He alone can judge righteously. But, when we stand upon God's judgment, we thereby are in agreement with Him. We're not independently judging apart from God's word. To do so is sin!
---Leon on 6/6/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Home Equity Loans


Gordon, I'm sure I'm naive in many areas. But let me ask you this: Are you yourself righteous enough to judge righteously?
---Love.wins on 6/6/13


Love.wins, Are you just being naive? The Lord Yahushua (Jesus) tells us to judge with righteous judgment, JOHN 7:24b, so, therefore it must be possible.
---Gordon on 6/6/13


Who among us is righteous enough to judge righteously?
---Love.wins on 6/6/13


Clarence, Do you claim to follow GOD? Christians are to be discerning. Christians are to judge with righteous judgment. You seem to have a problem with me saying that Michael Jackson's fruits were evil. Do you yourself think that listening to Michael Jackson's music is good for a follower of GOD? You see no evil in his music, his dance-moves, his personal beliefs?
---Gordon on 6/5/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Interest Rates


Cluny, Michal was not joyful about the incoming Ark, as David was. All that concerned her was how David humbled himself by shedding his kingly attire to don the humble tunic of a priest.

Michal was the daughter of a king. She may have been accustomed to kings always dressing pompuosly before the commoners.

Michal simply despised David's show of humility.

GOD judges the intent as well as the actions.

From the context of the Holy Scriptures we get absolutely no indication that GOD was displeased with David's dance, Cluny.

David did not dance to illicit lust.

Whereas, in Michael Jackson's case, his incessant crotch-grabbing was definitely intentional! And it was used by Satan to woo in the masses.
---Gordon on 6/5/13


Only God know. Are you a Christian by judging Michael is the question.
---Clarence_Fairley on 6/4/13


An ephod was a priestly garment worn over a simple robe, there was nothing immodest about it. David just had simple (humble) clothing, not his kingly garb that would have designated him as above the others, he was dressed as the rest of Levites bearing the ark. David was humbled before his Lord and the ark.

David danced humbly before the Lord. Not in underwear, but in the simple ephod that everyone serving the Lord would wear. This was a humble persons attire, not sinful or shameful. Michal accused David of dancing like a common man and beneath his station in life, no robe or crown to set him off as more important than others. And it is obvious by her punishment from God that she was the one in the wrong, not David.
---Jed on 6/4/13


Gordon, I,m not talking about motivation for dancing.

I'm talking about what David actually WORE.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/4/13


Send a Free Salvation Tract


Cluny, We know that David danced IN JOY before his GOD, and before the holy Ark.

David danced because of his Joy in the LORD. Not to incite lust.

Whatever of David's personal belongings that showed was BY ACCIDENT as he danced. Not by deliberation to incite lust in his onlookers.

Nor did David dance in order to entertain those around him, (though others may have been entertained as a result, but that was not David's intent.) That's not shown in the context.


Whereas, on the other hand, Michael Jackson did deliberately move and groove to impress people.

MJ did not dance for "the Joy of the LORD", but, rather, he danced to edify himself before his fan-base.

Yahushua is Risen!
---Gordon on 6/4/13


\\That David wore humble garments, something "beneath his status or dignity", and that "exposed" his humility before all, before the maidens. Just a thought, though.
---Gordon on 6/3/13
\\

It wasn't his humility that he was exposing, Gordon.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/4/13


Gordon: I totally agree, BUT no matter what you say the ol' goat (blog billy) will butt against it!

:D

---Leon on 6/4/13


\\That David wore humble garments, something "beneath his status or dignity", and that "exposed" his humility before all, before the maidens. Just a thought, though.
---Gordon on 6/3/13
\\

It wasn't his humility that he was exposing, Gordon.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 6/4/13


Leon, Jed, and Cluny, I read a commentary that what king David wore, when he danced before GOD's Ark, was a simple linen ephod, which only Priests were assigned to wear, which was not the higher-grade, kingly apparel which he normally would have worn. And this is what Michal was (or, may have been) embarrassed about. That David wore humble garments, something "beneath his status or dignity", and that "exposed" his humility before all, before the maidens. Just a thought, though.
---Gordon on 6/3/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Internet Marketing


...That is true if GOD were displeased about how David danced, HE would have expressed that displeasure somehow. But, HE was pleased by David's expression of Joy. Michal was embittered...David danced mightily before the LORD & lived unto to ripe old age.

Michael Jackson danced with his "freak on" & where is he now?
---Gordon on 6/3/13


Gordon: What we post on CN blogs should always be for the purpose of gleaning Bible truth as it pertains to people in Scripture as well as all of mankind (past, present & future). Truth sets free!!!

No one should ever post here for the sake of prideful self agrandizement. That's devilish/satanic: displeases & gives God no glory!

God bless!!!
---Leon on 6/3/13


Thank you, Brother Leon. And, Jed, for the reiteration. That is true if GOD were displeased about how David danced, HE would have expressed that displeasure somehow. But, HE was pleased by David's expression of Joy. Michal was embittered.

Cluny, Did you see what Leon and Jed testified to?

King David danced mightily before the LORD and lived unto to ripe old age.

Michael Jackson danced with his "freak on" and where is he now?
---Gordon on 6/3/13


That's the Bible truth Jed! :)
---Leon on 6/2/13


The only person who rebuked (actually mocked) David because of his dancing was his wife. GOD DIDN'T!!! Apparently, the Lord didn't see it as sin (lewd & provacative) like Michal did & obviously "Cluny" now does.
---Leon on 6/2/13


Not only did God not rebuke David for his dancing, He even went as far as cursing David's wife for rebuking him. He closed up her womb so that she could never bear children because she rebuked David for dancing.
---Jed on 6/2/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Life Insurance


Gordon: You'll get no where with that ol' goat. No matter what you say, you know, he will butt against it! :)

I agree with your stand because it corresponds with sound Bible teaching. The thread I consistently see woven in Scripture is when God's people sin, He "always" called them on the carpet (rebuked & punished/corrected them) regarding it.

The only person who rebuked (actually mocked) David because of his dancing was his wife. GOD DIDN'T!!! Apparently, the Lord didn't see it as sin (lewd & provacative) like Michal did & obviously "Cluny" now does.

Regarding MJ: "Be not deceived ~ God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap." (Gal. 6:7, KJV)
---Leon on 6/2/13


Cluny, It's what you do with what's underneath that makes the difference.

There is no indication in the Scriptures that whatever of king David's personal stuff showed while he danced was to express himself in a sexually provocative way.

Whereas, on the other hand, Michael Jackson's thrusting hip-gyrations, aggressive crotch-grabbing and demonic hand-signals were clearly not of GOD, but of the Devil.
---Gordon on 6/2/13


\\When king David danced before the Ark of the Covenant, II SAMUEL 6:14, it was highly unlikely that, at any time, he provocatively grabbed his crotch and swiveled his thighs in a sensual manner such as what Michael Jackson regularly did.\\

Apparently, David danced in little more than a G-string.

Was this less provocative?

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/31/13


Rules of CN forbid giving URLs, as I've told you before.
---Cluny on 5/31/13


You can still name the specific website as I did when I debunked your fake statistics about married child molesters on that blog. Simply repeating someone else' claims without specifying who said it is not citing a source. And telling someone to "google it" is not citing a source either. You could say something like "according to the Catholic's For Child Molestation Foundation..." or "my source is the Child Abuse Research Center website" without actually providing the URL link. And you know this as you have demanded sources from other bloggers many times.
---Jed on 5/31/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Make Money


Cluny, Yes, I have seen MJ's dancing. And, I would say that repeatedly grabbing one's crotch in a forceful manner would be considered as a demonic action.

When king David danced before the Ark of the Covenant, II SAMUEL 6:14, it was highly unlikely that, at any time, he provocatively grabbed his crotch and swiveled his thighs in a sensual manner such as what Michael Jackson regularly did.

Very unlikely.

Yahushua is Risen, indeed!
---Gordon on 5/31/13


\\Cluny, You are correct in that we can't give URLs of websites, but you CAN give specific titles of articles from which you claim as your source for statistics.
---Gordon on 5/31/13\\

When I mentioned that pedophiles were frequently married--in fact, over half the time--I gave appropriate quotes from the sites.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/31/13


\\And, again, since Cluny himself admitted he paid no attention to MJ, then, he is incapacitated from making any comments regarding what I've stated about MJ.\\

Have you noticed I have not said a single thing about MJ's dancing?

But I'm just wondering if you have seen his dancing, and if so, on what Biblical grounds you determine what kind of dancing is Godly and what kind is demonic, giving appropriate BCV.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/31/13


Cluny, You are correct in that we can't give URLs of websites, but you CAN give specific titles of articles from which you claim as your source for statistics.
---Gordon on 5/31/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Rehab Treatments


StrongAxe, The Bible says that by a person's fruits you can know them, MATTHEW 7:20. And, that, what comes out of their mouths, the words they speak, reflects what's in their hearts, LUKE 6:45. A truly Spiritually discerning person can tell of what spirit MJ was of. Therefore, my "logic" is Biblical. So, Cluny's reasoning errs in this. And, again, since Cluny himself admitted he paid no attention to MJ, then, he is incapacitated from making any comments regarding what I've stated about MJ.
---Gordon on 5/31/13


\\I highly doubt that statistic. Sources please?\\

Put "Teachers + Child Molestation" or something similar on your favorite search engine.

Rules of CN forbid giving URLs, as I've told you before.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/31/13


Francis, Why drag the Song of Songs through the mud? There is a great big, huge difference between the poetry that expresses the Godly sexual relationship between a man and his woman contained in the Song of Songs as opposed to the raunchy, illicit, crotch-grabbing dance moves of Michael Jackson. His dance moves accentuated with Satanic hand-gestures. And of the lust-laden lyrics of his self-aggrandizing songs.
---Gordon on 5/31/13


when I said I never will, that means I will never sit and watch Michael but when others have watched him, I have had to get up and leave the room. those watching were making not so nice comments.
---shira4368 on 5/31/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Stocks


And it's 5-6% of public school teachers.
---Cluny on 5/30/13


I highly doubt that statistic. Sources please?

Why is it you always demand sources from other people, even when they post common knowledge facts, but you can go around posting all kinds of bogus statistics about married child molesters without posting a single source? I looked up those uncited "statistics" you posted about most child molesters being married and it turns out that is a total lie. Most child abuse happens in unmarried homes and is done by the unmarried parent's boy/girl friend.
---Jed on 5/31/13


\\If a Catholic priest can be considered a Christian, then I guess Michael Jackson could too. Their behavior with young boys are quite strangely similar.
---Jed on 5/30/13\\

With this difference: It was 100% of Michael Jackson, and only 1.5% of Catholic priests.

And it's 5-6% of public school teachers.

_______

shira, today you said, "I have watched Michael Jackson several times."

But earlier today, you said: \\personally I have never watched it and I never will.
---shira4368 on 5/30/13\\.

Which is it? You can't have both watched him and have not watched him.

Make up your mind.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/30/13


If a Catholic priest can be considered a Christian, then I guess Michael Jackson could too. Their behavior with young boys are quite strangely similar.
---Jed on 5/30/13


strongax, I just used my brain a very tiny bit. I have watched Michael Jackson several times. he was a good entertainment and he could dance but some of his moves are sexually explicit. no matter what you say, facts are facts.
---shira4368 on 5/30/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Diabetes


Gordon:

You said: Cluny, You say you never paid any attention to MJ? Okay, and yet, you're doubting the words of people who have.

Again, you say you paid no attention to MJ, but, yet, you try to argue against the people who have paid attention??

he isn't arguing with your facts - just the methodology by which you derive conclusions from those facts (and thus, the validity of those conclusions).

I am frequently in a similar position on these blogs. I may not be in a position to comment on the validity of someone's factual claims, but I can point out the errors in their logic that cause them to jump to unjustified conclusions - regardless of whether such conclusiosn may or may not turned out to be correct.
---StrongAxe on 5/30/13


\\you go right ahead. personally I have never watched it and I never will.
---shira4368 on 5/30/13\\

Then you really have no way of knowing if MJ's dance moves were demonic, now do you?

And did you notice that I said I have NEVER watched him? Or did you read that far and merely reacted?

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/30/13


I loved MJ & the J' Five back in the day. They were seemingly innocent, energetic & fun to listen to & watch perform before they got dowsed with the unholy water of worldwide super star"doom". Like in the 1984 movie Gremlins, Michael made an instant change right before our eyes & began a courtship with necromancy,i.e., Thriller. His dancing became, to say the least, "unnatural" & extremely sexually oriented. He was fixated on changing his natural appearance to one that became bizarrely ghoulish looking. His Peter Panish ways with little boys was very "abnormal".

I think, due to the unchristian influences MJ was regularly exposed to, he became possessed by "them". Sad! :(
---Leon on 5/30/13


cluny, any dance that excites the human body in a sexual manner is demonic.
---shira4368 on 5/30/13

SONG of SONGS
---francis on 5/30/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Depression


cluny, any dance that excites the human body in a sexual manner is demonic. I think that goes without saying one word. if you want to watch it, you go right ahead. personally I have never watched it and I never will.
---shira4368 on 5/30/13


Cluny, You say you never paid any attention to MJ? Okay, and yet, you're doubting the words of people who have.

And, no. Just saying that MJ's moves were demonic does not make it so. It's the other way round, Clune.
It's the fact that they were demonic moves that cause us to say what they were.

Again, you say you paid no attention to MJ, but, yet, you try to argue against the people who have paid attention??

You're not making sense.
---Gordon on 5/30/13


\\cluny, Michael's dance moves were demonic.\\

Does saying so make them so, shira?

Just what are the Biblical standards for "demonic dance moves" and "Godly dance moves"? How do they differ? Please give BCV in your answer.

There was a time when the waltz was considered lascivious because the man actually put his arm around the woman's waist.

BTW, I never paid any attention to MJ.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/30/13


Shira, Very well put! It's a selling of one's soul to the Devil for the adoration of millions. There's a video on YouTube that shows the commercial advert for MJ's Greatest Hits CD from the 90's. They show this construction crew building this gargantuan statue of MJ and all this fanfare in celebration of him. So blatant. And the fans are glowing in awe and wonder of MJ and his statue. Reminded me of the Anti-Christ.

Cluny, Because I take the time to research and learn about such things as this. I don't know everything, that's for sure. But, I do know what I know. The Holy Spirit has given me a holy understanding and discernment for such things. Shira discerned it also. Perhaps you could too, if you wanted to badly enough.
---Gordon on 5/30/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Bible Study


amen leon. that is the basics of salvation.
---shira4368 on 5/29/13


cluny, Michael's dance moves were demonic. how in God's green earth can you say they are not. I have never in my life watched young people follow a worldly man such as Jackson. he sure got way too deep in his own self to ever get out. its a shame most stars suffer a similar fate. they are so full of themselves.
---shira4368 on 5/29/13


\\His dance moves were from demonic control, not from GOD.\\

Who told you? And what makes you an expert in this matter?

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/29/13


I don't think I've missed the point. Anyway, we don't have to agree on this. I said what I wanted to say. Peace to you.
---Love.wins on 5/29/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Bible Verses


womandisciple, Knowing where MJ ended up can serve as a reminder of what happens when we focus on "gaining the whole world" yet lose our own souls. Understanding this helps to put things in better perspective. Like, just because MJ had talent, does not mean he was living for the LORD. His dance moves were from demonic control, not from GOD. What does the Bible say when the majority speaks well of you? LUKE 6:26a, "Woe unto you, when all men shall speak well of you..." If the World is going ga ga-crazy over you, then, in GOD's economy, something's wrong. MJ's life was all about MJ, not GOD. Even John the Baptist said "He (Yahushua) must increase, but, I must DECREASE." Did MJ decrease himself or increase himself?
---Gordon on 5/29/13


"Exactly. Paul was writing to believers, a specific believer actually, named Timothy. He told Timothy God is the Savior of all believers, & not only believers, but everyone else..."All mankind"...If all mankind [isn't] saved, then God [isn't] the Savior of all...God bless you."
---Love.wins on 5/29/13


L.w.: I believe you've missed the point. True, Jesus died for the sins of ALL of mankind. But, not all of mankind believes on Him. Therefore, where many have the opportunity to be saved (if only they would believe), but many didn't/don't/won't believe & subsequently will perish in their sin because of their unbelief.

Of course it was Paul not Timothy writing. God bless!
---Leon on 5/29/13


Michael got the attention of this world. Why follow how this world would take our attention?

"Love has been perfected among us in this: that we may have boldness in the day of judgment, because as He is, so are we in this world." (1 John 4:17)

According to this, our Biblical reason for "boldness in the day of judgment" is "because as He is, so are we in this world." So, I hope this is getting more attention than Michael Jackson and Calvinists and Armenians and me, myself, and I being right.
---willie_c: on 5/29/13


NO, Michael Jackson was a Pedophile who practiced Tots for Toys. Self gratification and substance abuse was his religion!!!
---Blogger9211 on 5/29/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Arthritis


Exactly. Paul was writing to believers, a specific believer actually, named Timothy. He told Timothy that God is the Saviour of all believers, and not only believers, but everyone else too. "All mankind" means just what it says. If all mankind are not saved, then God is not the Saviour of all mankind. God bless you.
---Love.wins on 5/29/13


Michael left Jehovah Witness years ago before his death.

When he had his Children as the sole parent, His Sister LaToya said he studied all the religions and esp the Christian faith.

MJ finally picked the Catholic Church for his Children, and made them go to daily Mass.
But, she said she didn't know if he converted to the Catholic faith himself.

She did say he baptized all 3 children Catholic.

LaToya also said that after his death her mother (MJ's mother) stopped the Children from attending Daily Mass and makes them go to JW's services now.

She also said the children are completely lost because they only knew the Catholic faith, and are sad they can not go to Mass any longer.
---Nikki on 5/29/13


"That is why we labor & strive, because we have put our hope in the living God, who is the Savior of all people, and especially of those who believe." 1 Tim. 4:10

L.w: First, let's understand, Timothy was speaking to believers. He accurately said Jesus died for ALL OF HUMANITY (everyone). However, he went on to say Jesus is "SPECIFICALLY" the Savior of those, who by faith, "believe" in Him & thereby receive His salvation. As we know, not everyone in the world believes in Jesus. Unbelievers therefore reject God's gift of salvation in the Savior Jesus Christ.

Regarding M.J., only God knows. I personally believe he was unfortunately possessed...
---Leon on 5/28/13


sorry but if Michael wasn't a born again believer, he will not be in heaven ever ever.
---shira4368 on 5/28/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Asthma


Michael will be saved together with all the rest of humanity at the time God chooses. 1 Timothy 4:10
---Love.wins on 5/28/13


What??????
---Jed on 5/28/13


Michael will be saved together with all the rest of humanity at the time God chooses. 1 Timothy 4:10
---Love.wins on 5/28/13


I have no reason to believe that he was a Christian and his lifestyle would point to him not being. I have never heard that he became a muslim but one of his brothers did (Jermain I think) quite some time ago. I see no point in trying to label him now. God will deal with him on judgement day - as he will with everyone else.
---Rita_H on 5/28/13


He was raised Jehovah's witness but fame and fortune got to him , as it has spoiled many, who find themselves in the public eye!
---1st_cliff on 5/28/13


Read These Insightful Articles About Cholesterol


He became a mahometan.

Christ is risen!
---Cluny on 5/28/13


Only God knows what Michael Jackson believed. He is past on now so it isn't our concern, it s between him & God on judgment day. What IS our concern is giving the good news to everyone we know that is willing to listen.
---womandisciple on 5/28/13


Since the Bible says that we will know them by their fruit, I can only assume that Michael Jackson was not a Christian.
---KarenD on 5/28/13


Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.