ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Ken Ham Versus Pat Roberson

What does anyone think about Ken Ham stating that the earth is very young, around 6000 years old and Pat Roberson stating that basically it is absurd? Do you hold to creationist science?

Join Our Christian Singles and Take The Creationism Quiz
 ---judy on 2/6/14
     Helpful Blog Vote (3)

Post a New Blog



"How can Jesus "leave you" to walk In the light?"-kathr
He doesn't. And you keep bringing it up. This is not what John 12:35 says. Quit being obstinate when the passage is right there in front of you.
As for the Blog, I agree with Jerry that the Earth was created in 6 days about 6k years ago. On what I do not agree with him is that the Sabbath rest was a sign of the covenant for all. It specifically states that it was for Israel. This is the same with circumcision, which has been annulled in the New covenant. But that is for another blog.
---micha9344 on 2/19/14


For those who forgot the subject of this blog:

God Himself wrote in stone how long He took to create the heaven and the earth, and exactly how he expects us to memorialize it. But most are unwilling to give up man-made traditions in favor of God-given Commandments.




---jerry6593 on 2/19/14


John 12:37 "But though he had done so many miracles before them, yet they believed not on him:"
Those were his disciples? Them who did not believe in Him? If that is the case, that speaks against their belief of pre-destination, pre-salvation before belief-faith.
It would mean that Jesus taught all men alike, "not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance."

Actually, it was to unbelievers he said, "Luke 13:3 "I tell you, Nay: but, except ye repent, ye shall all likewise perish."
and,
Matthew 21:31_32 "...: and ye, when ye had seen it, repented not afterward, that ye might believe him."
---Nana on 2/18/14


Micha, Jesus is the light, and those who follow Him are alway in the light. How can Jesus "leave you" to walk In the light? I will never leave you or forsake you. .The verse does not need a narrative to explain the verse, as BobM thinks it does. There is no previous verse stating such a thing.

The Gospel also opens eyes from darkness to light.

Satan , not God , has blinded the eyes of those until the light of the glorious Gospel shines into them.

God blinded Israel UNTIL the fulness of the Gentiles come in.

But again, this all may be over your head, and that is why you are being contentious here. I understand not all have a spiritual mind to see detailed truth, and rightly divided truth.
---kathr4453 on 2/18/14


kathr, If you read the verse that BobM was referencing, you would have not interpreted his statement to read "I am leaving you now so I can walk in the light".
You are very contentious and want to argue a lot before understanding is made.
Let's see again what BobM posted:
"Jesus had just told the disciples He was leaving them, to walk in the light"
Now John 12:35 Then Jesus said unto them, Yet a little while is the light with you. Walk while ye have the light...
I don't see how you can misunderstand his post if you had read the reference.
You jump to conclusions without wisdom nor understanding.
Pro 3:13 Happy [is] the man [that] findeth wisdom, and the man [that] getteth understanding.
---micha9344 on 2/18/14




John 8:12
Then spake Jesus again unto them, saying, I am the light of the world: he that followeth me shall not walk in darkness, but shall have the light of life.


John 9:5
As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world.


Micha, you were saying?????
---kathr4453 on 2/18/14


Micha, Jesus never said, "I am leaving you now so I can walk in the light".
---kathr4453 on 2/18/14


Jesus had just told the disciples He was leaving them, to walk in the light because, "he who walks in darkness does not know where he is going"-Bob_M on 2/18/14
"seriously? where is this verse."-kathr4453 on 2/18/14
John 12:35 Then Jesus said unto them, Yet a little while is the light with you. Walk while ye have the light, lest darkness come upon you: for he that walketh in darkness knoweth not whither he goeth.
-Shouldn't one know the Bible before they debate it? At least be Berean about it.
---micha9344 on 2/18/14


Jesus had just told the disciples He was leaving them, to walk in the light because, "he who walks in darkness does not know where he is going"

---Bob_M on 2/18/14


seriously? where is this verse. My Bible says Jesus IS THE LIGHT.

Again BobM, you use verses you select out of context to prove what? That GOD blinded the eyes of the JEWS, yet we see Satan has blinded as well.

So let's let God's blinding of the Jews stand for now as we see why in Romans 9-11, and lets open the eyes of the GENTILES that Satan has blinded through the preaching of the Gospel as Paul shows when he went to Rome.

Do YOU know THAT verse?

Still up to your old tricks.
Same ol same ol same ol snake pit!
---kathr4453 on 2/18/14


Acts 26:17-19

17 Delivering thee from the people, and from the Gentiles, unto whom now I send thee,

18 To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.

19 Whereupon, O king Agrippa, I was not disobedient unto the heavenly vision:
---kathr4453 on 2/18/14




"Love.wins is me, and I am nobody else on these blogs whatsoever."
---Love.wins on 2/17/14

Well, your statement "I am nobody" makes it very clear for anyone wondering.
Remember 2 Thesalonians 2:10_12? Things do not quite represent what you
say or have said when taken out of context, do they? Out of those verses all
you could summarise was " Nana, the point is, God can and does delude people
when he feels like it."

Love always win but you are at a loss and seem to be headed for a bigger one.
---Nana on 2/18/14


"Love.wins is me, and I am nobody else on these blogs" Love.wins

Yea, sure. Do you really think anyone will fall for that? Try same URL.

Do you believe that anyone who would lie about God would lie about themselves?
---Elder on 2/18/14


Love wins, peace and grace to you in the name of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Sorry some believe I am you. My answer to you must have been very wrong, it offended many.
Mark 4:12: "so that, they may be ever seeing but never perceiving, and ever hearing but never understanding, otherwise they might turn and be forgiven"
John 12:40: "He has blinded their eyes and deadened their hearts, so they can neither see with their eyes, nor understand with their hearts, nor turn and I would heal them"
Jesus had just told the disciples He was leaving them, to walk in the light because, "he who walks in darkness does not know where he is going"
---Bob_M on 2/18/14


Love W: " I have found nobody else who posts anything at all similar to what I post, although it would be nice if I could find somebody here similar to myself. :)"

Stick to the Bible, Love and you'll find many of us in agreement with you.

God Himself wrote in stone how long He took to create the heaven and the earth, and exactly how he expects us to memorialize it. But most are unwilling to give up man-made traditions in favor of God-given Commandments.



---jerry6593 on 2/18/14


If God wants everybody to be saved but is unable to do that, then he is not much of a God, and I suppose he will be unhappy through all eternity because of his inability.
---Love.wins on 2/17/14

Seriously love.wins NOBODY here thinks like you????

How often we have heard these exact words from Markv, and those Markv has given other names too.

Well as long as Bob-M doesn't start name calling, I will just use him as my "MUSE", since he refuses to answer back.

They base their election on Romans 9, strangely , however there is NO ETERNAL SECURITY as we see what happened to those God delivered out of Egypt. Again showing Romans 9 is not about ETERNAL SECURITY. So, their salvation is built on sinking sand.
---kathr4453 on 2/18/14


Love wins, you will not find anyone else that believes satan will be saved. What you post is not biblical.
---shira4368 on 2/18/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Software


Love.wins is me, and I am nobody else on these blogs whatsoever. I have found nobody else who posts anything at all similar to what I post, although it would be nice if I could find somebody here similar to myself. :)
---Love.wins on 2/17/14


Markv has multiple names on cn as to make folks think he has numbers on his side. The thing is, there are no sides, but the Word of God.
---shira4368 on 2/17/14


Bob_M: "Those perishing are already deceived and will never believe the message of the cross."

Never say never. Isn't that how the adage goes? There are hundreds everyday that were perishing, heard the word, repented of their sins and are baptised.

If what you say is true then no one is saved because we are ALL sinners, eh?
---Steveng on 2/17/14


Jude 1:5 I will therefore put you in remembrance, though ye once knew this, how that the Lord, having saved the people out of the land of Egypt, afterward destroyed them that believed not.

Salvation is not coming out, but "ENTERING IN".

perfect exaple:

2 Peter 2:20 For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world ( EGYPT) through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.

21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them. Now read verse 22!
---kathr4453 on 2/17/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Advertising


Be not deceived for there are those who would creep in a try to lead people astray.
Here we have the same one,

Kathr it is not they it is him. This is the same 'ol Mark. Note the name
Bob M(ark) V.

He uses two names, Bob M and love wins and speaks to himself to try to convince others of his lies.

He forgets that there are some here with the Spirit of God in their hearts and He reveals the truth to us.
---Elder on 2/17/14


Those perishing are already deceived and will never believe the message of the cross.
Is that what you were trying to say? hope I'm right.

---Bob_M on 2/17/14


I object Your Honor, the witness is being coached and words are being put in his mouth.

"Sustained" said the Judge.

Yep, their bbbbbbaaaaaaaccccckkkkkkk!
---kathr4453 on 2/17/14


THE PREACHING OF THE CROSS

A Strange Message--- What exactly IS the Preaching of the Cross? Ans: That there should be life out of death. A NEW CREATURE, and New Creation.

The Jews were looking for a Messiah Who would throw off Rome and give them liberty from their captors, not a Messiah who would shed His Blood to give them liberty from death and sin.. They totally missed the fact that their Messiah would be One Who would suffer for the sins of the people, Isa. 53:1-3.

The Preaching of the CROSS is not election. Never has been and never will be.


If MarkV understood this, he would stop using this verse to make a point he clearly does not understand himself.
---kathr4453 on 2/17/14


BobM, I see nowhere in "the message of THE CROSS" a TULIP. What we see in Hebrews 3-4, God's Elect Israel who came out of Egypt Romans 9 were also destroyed as was Pharaoh and his people. WOW! We also see because of THEIR unbelief they did not "ENTER IN". The Promise of the Land was already theirs. God did not renege on His Promise. AND if perhaps a select election was in view, why was it based on the disobedience of those who already could claim that promise just by getting up off their hind ends and going over to take what God had already given them.

This is also true of salvation promised for all to take POSSESSION of a promise given you. No one just woke up already in the promise land!
---kathr4453 on 2/17/14


Send a Free Memorial Day Ecard


"There are those who were dismissed who have came back using another name.

Same old falsehoods and cultist just different poster names."
---Elder on 2/17/14

Yes indeed. Look, there goes one flying overhead just now...!

It was impossible to have a dialog with them before and even now it may still be. For that reason I said that we may have to let them float down the river...

Hebrews 13:2 "Be not forgetful to entertain strangers: for thereby some have entertained angels unawares."
We don't have to worry about that with these even if they come disguised as 'humble pie'.
---Nana on 2/17/14


2 Thess 8 And then shall that Wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of his mouth, and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming: Even him, whose coming is after the working of Satan with all power and signs and lying wonders,And with all deceivableness of unrighteousness in them, because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved. 11 And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:( singular...(((A LIE, ONE LIE, not lies as in plural) 12 That they all might be damned who believed not( past tense) the truth, but had ( past tense)pleasure in unrighteousness.

Do you know what "THE LIE" is?
---kathr4453 on 2/17/14


Love W, after hearing what you had to say, there is a passage that kind of speaks on what you were trying to say in a few words, and it is found in the book of 1 Corinthians chap. 1, verse 18, Paul speaking to the church of God which is at Corinth, to those sanctified in Christ Jesus,
"for the message of the cross is foolishness to those who are perishing, but to us who are being saved it is the power of God."
Those perishing are already deceived and will never believe the message of the cross.
Is that what you were trying to say? hope I'm right.
---Bob_M on 2/17/14


Nana, again you are correct.

We must be careful though.

There are those who were dismissed who have came back using another name.

Same old falsehoods and cultist just different poster names.
---Elder on 2/17/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Eating Disorders


Elder, we have a slew of 'learned men' in their own minds with specific agendas and it is not to build but to destroy and disperse.
Jude 1:20 "But ye, beloved, building up yourselves on your most holy faith, praying in the Holy Ghost,..."
For sure we are persuaded differently and our faith is not their faith. Some of these we may have to let float down the river.
---Nana on 2/17/14


"Nana, the point is, God can and does delude people when he feels like it."
Love.wins

Please post what makes God feel like it? The question is simple and it appears that no one wants to answwer. Why does God send/allow strong delusions?

I've stated, Because the deceivers have not accepted truth God allows them to wander.

The Greek word used for delusion is "plane" and means a wandering, wrong opinion, error in morals/religion and/or forsaking the right path.

Do you think I am wrong?
---Elder on 2/16/14


"Careful what assumptions you lead into with generalizations as some may be led to think God is whimsical and unrighteous.
Those verses state clearly why will God send "strong delusion" and to whom."
Nana

Nana, your statement is so very true!

Some people will never accept it because they don't want to.

Those who don't take the time to understand Scripture, like the Calvainist, will always try to make God a hateful, and unloving god.

Thanks for your post.

---Elder on 2/17/14


2 Timothy 3:12_13 Yea, and all that will live godly in Christ Jesus shall suffer persecution.
But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse, deceiving, and being deceived."

Pair that to 2 Thesalonians 2:10_12.
---Nana on 2/16/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Travel Packages


Nana, the point is, God can and does delude people when he feels like it.
---Love.wins on 2/16/14


Strongaxe, you correctly describe such as "light from distance stars, radioactive decay, etc" as evidence. These things cannot be scientifically proved one way or the other, and do not speak for themselves, they will always be interpreted in the light of any individuals world view/bias.

Imagine two scientists looking at the Grand Canyon. The evolutionist may say-look at what that little river has done over billions of years. The Christian may say-look at what Noah's world-wide flood did in a relatively short period of time. Neither can be proved but the available evidence better fits with Scripture the Truth from He who was there.
---Warwick on 2/16/14


2 Thesalonians 2:10_12.

" Isn't God quoted somewere as saying that he sends strong delusions so that people will believe lies?"
---Love.wins on 2/15/14

Careful what assumptions you lead into with generalizations as some may be led to think God is whimsical and unrighteous.
Those verses state clearly why will God send "strong delusion" and to whom.
---Nana on 2/15/14


God did not intentionally create the Earth to make man believe it's billions of years old, that's just the way he created the universe.
---Steveng on 2/15/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Credit Repair


"Isn't God quoted
he sends strong delusions so that people will believe lies?"
Love.wins

The quote is from II Thess 2.

It is a warning to men trying to deceive others from the cause of Christ.

Because the deceivers have not accepted truth God allows them to wander.

The Greek word used for delusion is "plane" and means a wandering, wrong opinion, error in morals/religion and/or forsaking the right path.

If someone forsakes the truth you would expect them to just wander about. It is a result of not accepting and/or preverting the truth, like Calvinist do.

Read all of II Thess 2.

God loves all people with a perfect love but gives them a choice as to what they want.
---Elder on 2/15/14


Isn't God quoted somewere as saying that he sends strong delusions so that people will believe lies?
---Love.wins on 2/15/14


//The only reason I could think of is to deliberately deceive us. And, the last time I heard, that job belonged to someone else.//

Good point. :-)
---Rod4Him on 2/15/14


Steveng:

The measurement instruments that men make are not generally faulty or inaccurate. The problems arise when men make "assumptions" which are not valid. For example, when U-Pb is used to date a rock, the rock is ground up and the U and Pb are assayed and their amounts ratioed to determine the age (knowing the decay rate of the U). Inherent in the process is the "assumption" that ALL of the PB in the rock is a daughter product of the U. Since infusion of soluble PB into rocks by water is well established, the assumption is invalid, and the date thus obtained is much older than the actual age. But the MAN doing the measurement reports the date that agrees with his pre-conceived paradigm.


---jerry6593 on 2/15/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Products


Steveng:

"Heaven and earth declare the glory of God".

Why would God create, in the very fabric of earth and space, strong evidence (like light from distance stars, radioactive decay, etc.) that indicates that the earth and the universe are much older than they actually are? What would be the point in doing so? The only reason I could think of is to deliberately deceive us. And, the last time I heard, that job belonged to someone else.
---StrongAxe on 2/15/14


Man created test equipment that would make rocks "appear" to be five billion years old even if God created the Earth seven days ago.

What about the light from a distant star? God put into place every single atom, including light atoms that reaches all corners of the universe, at the time of creation. So, man creates test equipment that detremines the distance the star is from the Earth and how fast light travels and then "assumes" the universe is fifty billion years old even if God created the universe seven days ago.
---Steveng on 2/15/14


Cluny wrote: "Anything that works" is the devil's game.

Elder wrote: No, anything that doesn't work is the devils, like lies.

Actually, lies work rather well. They worked with devastating effect in Eden. If lies and other similar tools didn't work, the devil wouldn't waste his time using them, and God wouldn't need to warn us against them.
---StrongAxe on 2/14/14


I believe Elder that Cluny is saying that anything that works to the Devil's advantage He will use.

I believe about 6,000 years ago GOD reformed the earth to be inhabited. It could be longer but not shorter. I believe that the Earth existed but was in an not finished state.

I also believe that knowing GOD is the Creator of all things is the important point.
---Samuelbb7 on 2/14/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Divorce


"You already have[ignored Cluny]."
That's the best way to learn anything dealing with you. I just use it.

"Anything that works" is the devil's game."
Cluny
No, anything that doesn't work is the devils, like lies.
---Elder on 2/13/14


\\I'm just gonna have to find something of yours to ignore.
---Elder on 2/12/14\\

You already have.

"Anything that works" is the devil's game.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/13/14


"Tu quoque" (You too!) is not a good debate technique."
Cluny

"rien que des travaux vont faire" Anything that works,

Snicker snicker I also noticed there are now more questions you ignored...

I'm just gonna have to find something of yours to ignore.
---Elder on 2/12/14


\\So why did you ignore or fail to respond to the other questions I asked?\\

"Tu quoque" (You too!) is not a good debate technique.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/12/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Marriage


"And you've ignored my words that Genesis should be compared with the violent creation myths of surrounding cultures. Why?"
cluny

Now don't get psycho on me just yet. Just because I didn't comment on a statement you made doesn't mean I ignored it.

So why did you ignore or fail to respond to the other questions I asked?

Do you just answer the ones you "think" you have an answer for or what?
---Elder on 2/12/14


\\What was light created from?
---Elder on 2/12/14\\

"In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth." This, in scientific terms, was the Big Bang--the beginning of the time-space-matter-energy continuum.

"God said, 'Let there be light,' and there was light." As I understand the BBT, light was the first energy to distinguish itself from the TSME continuum.

And you've ignored my words that Genesis should be compared with the violent creation myths of surrounding cultures. Why?

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/12/14


// Jerry, I really enjoyed both of your posts! That is excellent information.
---trey on 2/10/14 //

Trey: Get yourself a copy of "The Evolution Handbook" by Vance Ferrell at Amazon or at his website evolution-factsdotorg. It's filled with such data.




//Ken Ham is an incompetent Maggot Head.
---Blogger9211 on 2/11/14 //

Very astute! You must be highly educated.



// But the Bible is basically silent, how important can it be?
---michael_e on 2/10/14 //

Perhaps you never read Jesus' own written record on the subject:

Exo 20:11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day:



---jerry6593 on 2/12/14


"I was taught in school that evolution is an orderly and sequential process of development from simpler to more complex forms. This is precisely the pattern in Genesis 1."
Cluny

How about posting some verses that show this? Or, do you consider nothing to something or dust to man to be simpler to more complex forms? What was light created from?
---Elder on 2/12/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Debt Consolidation


Adam-130, Seth-105, Enos-90, Cainan-70, Mahalaleel-65, Jared-162, Enoch-65, Methuselah-187, Lamech-182, Noah-502, Shem-100, Salah-35, Salah-30, Eber-34, Peleg-30, Reu-32, Serug-30, Nahor-29, Terah-130, Abram
So, about 2k years from the beginning of creation to Abraham, about 2k years from Abraham to Jesus, and about 2k year from Jesus to us.
6000 years
---micha9344 on 2/11/14


\\It is important because there are many in the world who use these 'long ages' to 'prove' that the bible is wrong.\\

Not necessarily.

I was taught in school that evolution is an orderly and sequential process of development from simpler to more complex forms. This is precisely the pattern in Genesis 1.

The real question is if the Bible should be read as science and history the way we understand those disciplines today. I don't believe it should.

While I'm not denying the recorded history is only 6-10 thousand years old, the Biblical creation story should not be compared and contrasted with scientific statements, but with the creation myths of the surrounding cultures.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/11/14


I finally found the Video of Pat Robertson criticizing Ken Ham. Pat Roberson is Totally Correct.

Ken Ham is an incompetent Maggot Head.
---Blogger9211 on 2/11/14


//It is important because there are many in the world who use these 'long ages' to 'prove' that the bible is wrong.//
So how can it be proven that it is 6000 or 6,000.000 years old?
---michael_e on 2/11/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Refinancing


It is important because there are many in the world who use these 'long ages' to 'prove' that the bible is wrong. Once a person can convince other people that the bible is wrong it is just a small step away from saying that this information shows that the bible was written by man and that there is no Creator God and, therefore, no Jesus - no sacrifice for sin - no forgiveness and that we are all in control of our own destiny.
---Rita_H on 2/11/14


Ham, has an opinion, Robertson has an opinion.
But the Bible is basically silent, how important can it be?
---michael_e on 2/10/14


//They had determined that X amount of dust settling for X amount of years would mean X amount of feet in dust.//

or they just miscalculated the compression rate of moon dust. This is a more logical answer. In engineering, we mis-calculate all the time that is why we have safety factors.
---Scott1 on 2/11/14


""U.S. Geological Survey has examined Earth Rocks, Moon Rocks from Apollo missions ...."

Did you know that NASA was concerned about Cosmic dust on the moon before the landing there?

They were worried that if the universe was as old as they thought the dust would swallow the landing craft.

They had determined that X amount of dust settling for X amount of years would mean X amount of feet in dust.

It turned out the amount of dust on the luner surface meant the universe was no where as old as they had thought and been taught.
---Elder on 2/10/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Franchises


There is NO WAY that anyone can know that something is billions of years old. Everything is tested against something else and, as we have nothing which is billions of years old to compare something else with, everything is a guess or an assumption.

I think that Ken Ham is correct and thoroughly enjoy listening to him speaking to audiences from tiny kids up to us oldies.

All age comparisons are made on the assumption that the earlier decision about one thing was correct. If that was wrong then everything tested against that will also be wrong.

Every time we hear about the age of some new discovery they seem to add a few million (or even billion) years to the assumed age of the last discovery.
---Rita_H on 2/10/14


Jerry, I really enjoyed both of your posts! That is excellent information.

I believe Ken Ham to be correct. I have never seen the bible disproved.
---trey on 2/10/14


"U.S. Geological Survey has examined Earth Rocks, Moon Rocks from Apollo missions and Meteor samples, 4.5 Billion Years of age is a reasonable consistent age from all three sources by radio graphic half lives of the minerals they contain."-Blogger9211 on 2/9/14
-How did they find out how many parent isotopes the rocks originally contained?
-How did they know how many daughter isotopes also?
-No contamination in those 4.5 billion years?
-No decay variance due to extreme heat or pressure either?
-The irony here is that people can take the same rock on Earth and get multitudes of results from it through radio-isotope dating. It is easy just to pick a common number and say "Eureka!"
-error in, error out
---micha9344 on 2/10/14


Blogger: Do you have any idea of the variability of the ages determined by the various radiometric dating methods? Are you aware of the ridiculous assumptions made to use these methods? Go study it out for yourself.

If the moon were indeed 4.5 billion years old, it would be covered with a dust layer several miles thick. But the dust layer on the moon is only 2-3 inches thick at most, consistent with a 6000 year age.



---jerry6593 on 2/10/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Lead Generation


U.S. Geological Survey has examined Earth Rocks, Moon Rocks from Apollo missions and Meteor samples, 4.5 Billion Years of age is a reasonable consistent age from all three sources by radio graphic half lives of the minerals they contain.
---Blogger9211 on 2/9/14


Scott, you asked "did Adam see all of creation from single cell organism to man?" It is not clear to me what you mean but if you are asking did Adam see the above creatures created, the answer must be no as he was made after them.

Maybe your question had a different meaning?
---Warwick on 2/8/14


blogger: "The true age of the Earth is about 4.5 billion years"

And just how would you know that. When I studied Historical Geology at University some 50 years ago, the age of the earth was 3.5 billion years. Imagine that! The age of the earth changed by 1 billion years in just 50 years. Since that time, the invention of the accelerator mass spectrometer has confirmed the finding of the Geiger counter that ALL the fossils of the earth are quite young, and in fact are the same age ~ 4,500 years old (Noah's flood). This finding alone completely invalidates any possibility of evolutionary development.

Modern "science" has no explanation at all for abiogenesis or the Cambrian explosion. Do you?

---jerry6593 on 2/8/14


God said formed, G,2:7 When he liked what he had made he breathed his life into it. Cause when he first saw the earth it was completely covered by water, or was it? How long has the earth been here, how long have we been here? When you talk to Jesus you will know for sure then.
---BRYAN on 2/8/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Mortgages


My question is how long did Adam live before the fall, did Adam see all of creation from single cell organism to man? Could animals eat each other and that not be considered death in biblical standards because that is a natural process of the pure earth?
---Scott1 on 2/7/14


Blogger,

Care to list, say, half a dozen names of ancients who professed to a flat earth?
---Marc on 2/7/14


Blogger the Bible is not based upon faulty science but is the word of the Creator.

What you call science is at best a changing belief based upon false assumptions. Real operational science was brought into being by scientists of the past who were to a man Christian. There is nothing in operational (testable, repeatable, observable) science which contradicts Scripture. In fact is supports it.

All the radiometric dating methods are based upon untestable assumptions therefore cannot be claimed as correct. Do you by chance know how K-Ar dating works?
---Warwick on 2/7/14


The true age of the Earth is about 4.5 billion years, ask a component geologist or astronomer. Bible accounts of creation are based on defective science of their time, a flat earth and the sun moved around the earth, both notions are false. It does not limit YHWH's creation ability only our understanding of the processes that he used in creation. Go to the Hubble Telescope site and marvel at the photos of the universe all YHWH's handy work.
---Blogger9211 on 2/7/14


Read These Insightful Articles About Personal Loans


Based upon the genealogies, Adam was created about 6,000 years ago.
Jesus also said man was created "at the beginning" of creation.-Mat 19:4, Mar 10:6.
These support the view that the Earth is around 6,000 years old.
The Laws of Nature did not exist before they were created, else they would have power over the Omnipotent One.
---micha9344 on 2/7/14


Gen 1:1 In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
Simply says in the beginning nothing about when 6000 yrs or 1,000.000 is irrevelent.
---michael_e on 2/7/14


I personally disagree with Ken Ham's views of creationism. I believe the Bible is true, yes because it is not about creation from a scientific standpoint of processes but more about the character of God and that he set-up those processes. Both camps have serious flaws. Ham predicts the major processes (gravity, speed of light, etc) change to fit into his 6,000 years when no scientific evidence exist of that change. Bill Nye (Darwinism) extrapolates a small change in birds to macro evolution likewise when no evidence supports to that. That hybrid animal to link fish to amphibians (basically a fish with "legs" to walk on land) they found a lot of them alive and the "legs" are just fins and used for swimming in deep water.
---Scott1 on 2/7/14


Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.