ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Gender Neutral Movement

There are those in the U.S. who want to outlaw gender specific restrooms in favor of gender neutrality. Is anyone concerned about this "gender neutral" movement?

Join Our Free Penpals and Take The Cultural Issues Bible Quiz
 ---Jed on 2/14/15
     Helpful Blog Vote (1)

Post a New Blog



You're such a poison apple (grouch) Jed. I'm glad this useless, "waste" of time blog is finished! Wipe, flush & wash your hands please...
---Leon on 3/3/15



After looking around I found a 32" TV for just 150 after a coupon discount.

I certainly don't have any play stations.

Glory to Jesus Christ!

---Cluny on 2/28/15


Great for you Cluny. I don't know what led you to believe I was talking about you? I wasn't. I was talking about welfare abusers. I hope you can tell the difference between saying that welfare abuse exists and saying that everyone on welfare is an abuser.

BTW: a 32" television is not a big screen TV. That's actually pretty small. That's what I have. I'm talking about welfare recipients with 55"+ televisions and the latest video game systems complete with surround sound.
---Jed on 2/28/15


After looking around I found a 32" TV for just 150 after a coupon discount.

I certainly don't have any play stations.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/28/15


What is the difference?

I just explained it in the very comment you quoted me from. You still didn't understand? Okay. I'll try to simplify a little bit. Fraud is when you commit crimes like lying to receive benefits you aren't legally allowed to get. Abuse is when someone is receiving benefits they don't actually absolutely need.

And like with $20 a month for food stamps, you can buy a big TV and computers and high-speed internet, right?

Thank you! That actually makes my case. If you've got $2,500 to spend on a big screen TV, a new PlayStation 4, and a new laptop, and $100 a month to pay for cable and internet, then you don't need to be given $20 a month for food.
---Jed on 2/27/15


"...I'm not worried, Leon. I know where I'm going. I am concerned for you though."
---Jed on 2/27/15


Au contraire, mon frre! All you constantly do Jed is worry & complain about this, that or there other.

Concerned about me?! That's a bold face lie Jed! You don't care a hill of beans for me. :)
---Leon on 2/27/15




Thanks StrongAxe. I'm well aware of how it works. You seem to be missing my point. My point is that people who can afford all those things are awarded benefits WITHOUT having to lie about their income at all. That means the current system, by design, gives benefits to people who could perfectly well meet their own basic needs. That means the system is not a safety for meeting basic human needs, but rather a means to reduce income inequality, which is abuse. That's why I say the system itself is abusive. If the system only awarded benefits to people who would actually starve or be homeless without it, then only a small fraction of current recipients would be in the system.
---Jed on 2/27/15


Worry, worry, worry, worry & complaining! That's all you do Jed. That must hurt like hell deep down inside of you! You do know you can worry yourself to death? Take care, worrying kills!!!
---Leon on 2/27/15


I'm not worried, Leon. I know where I'm going. I am concerned for you though.
---Jed on 2/27/15


Jed:

You wrote: I have personally seen thousands of people given food stamps (with the presumption that they can't afford to buy food) all the while they are able to purchase iphones, big screen televisions, surround sound systems, computers, and pay monthly cable television bills, high speed internet, and go partying. While there is nothing illegal about that,

When you apply for food stamps, you must disclose all sources of income, and all assets. If you have enough money to buy all those things you mentioned, the amount of food stamps you receive will be greatly reduced or eliminated. If you don't report them, that's welfare fraud.
---StrongAxe on 2/27/15


\\No Cluny, welfare FRAUD is illegal, not welfare abuse.\\

What is the difference?

And like with $20 a month for food stamps, you can buy a big TV and computers and high-speed internet, right?

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/27/15


Worry, worry, worry, worry & complaining! That's all you do Jed. That must hurt like hell deep down inside of you! You do know you can worry yourself to death? Take care, worrying kills!!!
---Leon on 2/27/15




No Cluny, welfare FRAUD is illegal, not welfare abuse. What you are referring to is fraud. I have personally seen thousands of people given food stamps (with the presumption that they can't afford to buy food) all the while they are able to purchase iphones, big screen televisions, surround sound systems, computers, and pay monthly cable television bills, high speed internet, and go partying. While there is nothing illegal about that, I hope you would agree that it is an immoral abuse of taxpayer money.
---Jed on 2/27/15


Back to the original subject of this thread, it was reported this morning that instead of standard 'male' and 'female' gender options, face book has 58 other gender identities you can choose from including 'neither', 'transgender', and 'questioning', as well as a fill-in-the-blank option. Of course as a private business facebook can do what ever they want. But it does speak to the perversion of the society that this ideology is tollerated in. I'm sure it is only a matter of time before government forms follow suite, or just eliminate gender identity all together.
---Jed on 2/27/15


My food stamps are on an EBT ... rather difficult to sell them.
... think with the card there is less of a chance for fraud.
---Cluny on 2/27/15

Well, you had me feeling better about the card until I googled, EBT abuses.

And am not trying to debate, argue or make a point. We're just looking at our system here.
I would feel better if your's was more, just knowing what little I do about you and your health problems.
Drugs, alcohol abuses seem to be common. In 2013 Ma, lost 30,000 cards. Seems some insiders were loading the blanks up with benefits.

Where there is a will there is a way. Seems to be a lot of will.
---Trav on 2/27/15


\\Sadly, there was nothing to report because the abuse is legal and encouraged.\\

Abuse of food stamps IS illegal.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/27/15


Cluny, I have worked as a social worker and I am one that saw the abuse. Sadly, there was nothing to report because the abuse is legal and encouraged. The system itself IS abusive. When I say "welfare abuse" I'm not talking about people committing illegal crimes like selling their food stamps or lying about their income. I'm talking about the system itself, which is supposed to be a 'temporary safety net' to help meet basic needs being used as a means of wealth redistribution. When non-working welfare recipients have better living conditions than working taxpayers, the system is abused.
---Jed on 2/27/15


\\Food stamps being sold etc, etc. \\

My food stamps are on an EBT card issued to me personally, so it would be rather difficult to sell them. So it is for my state, and I think with the card there is less of a chance for fraud.

Let me repeat, I know any abuse-proof system is impossible, but I'm trying to play by the rules.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/27/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Health Treatments


I'm not saying there are not abuses--any system cooked up by human beings can be gotten around--but I myself actually know of none.
---Cluny on 2/24/15

I am proud of a Nation that can take care of its own. I wish it was taking care of you better than $20.00Cluny.
I think most all have noticed the unbiased news accounts and reporting research. Medicare fraud by Dr's and patients. Food stamps being sold etc, etc.
Our Churches should probably do more. They are the Community they are built in.
I pray that all our Churches partake in the blessing of looking out for those needful around them.
---Trav on 2/26/15


\\I'm one of them that see the abuse of the system. You are the intended beneficiary of the idea. The needful. \\

Do you actually know anyone who is abusing the system?

If so, have you reported this?

I'm not saying there are not abuses--any system cooked up by human beings can be gotten around--but I myself actually know of none.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/24/15


Mark_Eaton:

I think SSD and SSI take into account other sources of income, so if you get retirement benefits, your social security benefits may be reduced, or even eliminated. I am just in the process of getting SSI (I was working until October, but was subsequently diagnosed with leukemia and spent 3 of the past 4 months in the hospital, and it's not clear if I will ever be able to hold down a regular job after this). They look at every source of income, every bank account, every asset that you might be able to sell, etc.
---StrongAxe on 2/24/15


However there are a lot of people, including conservative Christians on these blogs, who think that people on welfare grow rich, fat, and sassy off their dole and food stamps.
---Cluny on 2/24/15

I would like to know what is the intended purpose of SSI Disability?

The SSI web site says it pays benefits to people who have worked long enough and have a medical condition that has prevented them from working or is expected to prevent them from working for at least 12 months or ends in death.

But when does it end? At some point these people retire and then receive both retirement and disability. Is this right and fair to everyone who retires healthy and only receives retirement benefits?
---Mark_Eaton on 2/24/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Affiliate Program


However there are a lot ...who think that people on welfare grow rich, fat,....
I'm showing that this simply is not reality.
With God's help, I get by.
---Cluny on 2/24/15

I'm one of them that see the abuse of the system. You are the intended beneficiary of the idea. The needful.
We still live in a scripture found, blessed country where few feed many.
For all it's faults.
Deu 8:9 A land wherein thou shalt eat bread without scarceness, thou shalt not lack any thing in it, a land whose stones are iron, and out of whose hills thou mayest dig brass.
Deu 8:10 When thou hast eaten and art full, then thou shalt bless the LORD thy God for the good land which he hath given thee.
---Trav on 2/24/15


\\So you blame the Republicans for this?
It does make me worry for you \\

I'm not blaming anyone for this. it's just the way it is.

However there are a lot of people, including conservative Christians on these blogs, who think that people on welfare grow rich, fat, and sassy off their dole and food stamps.

I'm showing that this simply is not reality.

\\Why so little in food stamps...the amount doesn't sound righteous? \\

With God's help, I get by.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/24/15


FWIW, I'm on disability.
...grand total of $700 a month (or so) and $20--count ''em, just $20--in food stamps.
Who can live on that little here?
---Cluny on 2/23/15

So you blame the Republicans for this?
It does make me worry for you Cluny...truly. But, does your Church help you out?
Why so little in food stamps...the amount doesn't sound righteous?
And what about the proverbial sluggards that could work but won't.
If these were off all the backs of the working there would be an overflow to the needful like yourself.
Your situation doesn't apply, obviously worked contributing yourself to your own "soc security" fund.

How can we help Cluny? Give us your Church name and location.
---Trav on 2/24/15


Cluny, here in Australia the government is trialing a welfare debit card that is restricted for use only for purchases of essentials such a food, etc.

They did this as some on welfare use welfare payments for alcohol, gambling, etc, and then have too little remaining for essentials.

I agree welfare payments aren't much, but if it wasn't for the many lazy people who choose welfare when they could easily work for an income, then there would no doubt be more government funds available for better welfare for those in genuine need
---Haz27 on 2/23/15


Send a Free Spanish Ecard


Cluny, FWIW, I have lived on less than that, with other mouths to feed at that. Of course I didn't have a computer, cable television, or high speed internet bills to pay either.
---Jed on 2/23/15


\\I can't imagine the REP's would want to take food stamps away just to let people starve, especially those who have physical or mental incapacity preventing them from working.\\

FWIW, I'm on disability.

I get a grand total of $700 a month (or so) and $20--count ''em, just $20--in food stamps.

Who can live on that little here?

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/23/15


I myself am an invalid. I know that I cannot give as much as others.
---Peter on 2/22/15

You gave more today, Peter. May GOD Maximum use Peter.
Note the Blind, Lepers, Bleeding, Poor gave all of us more than any of the healthy did 2000yrs ago. They are our agonizing price paid witnesses in scripture. Because they were afflicted...they live on in our scripture. Their physical curse is their eternal blessing. They were healed.
One can be physically healthy with allegorically spiritual/mental afflictions being spiritually/scripturally equal.
Rev_3:17 Because thou sayest, I am rich,...knowest not that thou art wretched, and miserable, and poor, and blind, and naked:

Mat_11:5 The blind receive their sight, ...
---Trav on 2/23/15


It is evil, yes.

But we now are in a new age.

Each age has a new evil.

In the 1200-1850, it was the teaching of the 'one church' (probably in some things it was correct, but not in everything)

From 1850-1950 it was 'wealth'

From 1950-now it is everyone is equal, even if he cannot give anything to society. So the invalid who can give nothing is 'equal'. In Christianity the invalid may be given equal, but he is not worth equal. I myself am an invalid. I know that I cannot give as much as others. I must be happy that my employers are willing to take me, even though I am ill.


This is charity, not equality. If we accept it as charity (which I do) we live. If we desire it as 'a right' the system collapses
---Peter on 2/22/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Abortion Facts


Talking behind my back Hazard? Why am I not surprised?! Make sure you wipe real good, flush & wash your nasty little hands before leaving the ladies room... :D
---Leon on 2/22/15


Hi StrongAxe. Thanks for your support on that other topic as it was pointless me trying to reply to Leon.

I can't imagine the REP's would want to take food stamps away just to let people starve, especially those who have physical or mental incapacity preventing them from working.
I suspect a more likely motivation is to encourage the capable, but lazy, to get up and work.

I used to live in an area with many on welfare and many of these welfare neighbors were just lazy people happy to live on welfare.

It's sometimes gets recognized here that welfare is destroying the Aborigines. Yet it continues and their plight has failed to improve.

It's better that people work, gaining self-esteem and a better outlook in life.
---Haz27 on 2/22/15


Haz27:

You said: I don't see anyone advocating that people starve to death. Such claims against conservatives are just leftist propaganda to further their own agenda of destroying western societies through an increasing welfare burden

Many American republicans push strongly to reduce food stamps and other social programs. Many families rely on these, and for many of those, these are their only source of food. If your only source of food is reduced or eliminated, and you have no alternatives, you can starve to death. Similarly, eliminating health care is saying "if you get sick, you might as well die".


Jed:

There is a vast difference between "won't work" and "can't work".
---StrongAxe on 2/22/15


We were giving my Granddaughter a Birthday party at a fast food place and several of the little girls,about six or seven years old,had gone to the rest room together,but all of them came out in a hurry because shortly after they went in Transvestites came into the Ladies Restroom and the girls knew right away what they were and got out fast. It scared them to pieces. I hate the idea of no women's restrooms and find the whole concept of "gender neutrality" unacceptable. God Bless
---Darlene_1 on 2/22/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Acne Treatment


StrongAxe. I don't see anyone advocating that people starve to death. Such claims against conservatives are just leftist propaganda to further their own agenda of destroying western societies through an increasing welfare burden, etc.

The book "The Nak_d Communist", from the 1950's even listed a crippling welfare burden as one of the Left's goals in grinding America down.

The totalitarian Left want more people on welfare so they can better control them.

I recommend the documentary Agenda: Grinding America Down. It reveals the agenda given by the communist Left themselves, decades ago, to destroy the western Judeo/Christian/family society so that they can reshape it into their own godless, humanist ideal.
---Haz27 on 2/21/15


StrongAxe, I don't know any conservatives who are in support of just letting disabled people die, so I wouldn't know anything about that. Many of my friends are strong conservatives and I don't think one of them wants disabled people to die.

Of course, that's completely different than believing that it's wrong to tax working people almost into poverty, then give it to a person who is able to work, but refuses to. If you think that is "ultra-conservative" then you have made my point about liberals calling normal, common-sense thinking "ultra-conservative".
---Jed on 2/21/15


liberals consider the most warped, heinous, leftist thinking imaginable to be "moderate"---Jed

Good point Jed.

Common sense and Christian values are rejected by liberals. And as they control public debate through their dominance of mainstream media and the education system, thus we see western societies declining into decadence.

Family and marriage break downs, abortion/murder, rejecting God, etc, etc, are all the legacy of the tyranny of political correctness that liberals have been bullying society with for the past decades.
---Haz27 on 2/21/15


Jed:

Working for a living and being responsible for one's own actions are good conservative ideals. The idea that if somebody doesn't have a job, he should just be left to starve to death - that is ultra-conservative. Decreasing spending is a good conservative idea. Decreasing spending on social programs, while funneling billions int the military and corporate subsidies is ultra-conservative.
---StrongAxe on 2/21/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Bad Credit Loans


StrongAxe, I believe you were the one to use the 'ultra stuff' first.

Interestingly, it seems when a liberal says "ultra conservative" they really refer to ideals that aren't even really that conservative at all. Ideals that are really just common sense. Like being pro-life, decreasing spending, working for a living, supporting legal citizenship, or being pro family. How did we get to the point where those things are even considered conservative, much less "ultra conservative"? Those are basic ideals that everyone should share.

Meanwhile, liberals consider the most warped, heinous, leftist thinking imaginable to be "moderate".
---Jed on 2/21/15


Trav:

You said: So you are Ultra Liberal as opposed to Ultra conservative.

Where do you get this "ultra" stuff from? Ultra conservative is bad, and ultra liberal is bad. Extremism in any form tends to put one's own biased agenda ahead of the truth, which is never a good thing.
---StrongAxe on 2/21/15


Seems God better catch up with the liberal progressives and quit being so "ultra conservative".
---Jed on 2/20/15

Ultra...Truth, Jed. He is up ahead waiting.
GOD would be the "Ultra" GOD. He is beyond even what we can conceive.
Liberal now means liberal with truth.
Ultra Liberal means...extreme allowance for interpretation, because men desire what we desire when we desire it.

Not killing innocent babies through abortion is "Ultra" conservative now .

Liberal: Making excuses and reasons for killing a helpless, indefensible baby. Liberally defining that it is OK for certain or any reasons.

Scripture is clear on this or any other abomination.
---Trav on 2/20/15


God made them male and female.

Seems God was not too keen on the whole 'one-gender' ideology. Psshh. He's so "behind the times" isn't He? Seems God better catch up with the liberal progressives and quit being so "ultra conservative".
---Jed on 2/20/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Bankruptcy


Trav: ...No, it's only ultra-conservatives who cannot abide anyone believing in any way different that they do that consider "it" an abomination.
They don't speak for the entire body of Christ.
---StrongAxe on 2/19/15

Ahhhh,"it" huh?
Getting your, "it" above, more in every defensive reply from you.
So you are Ultra Liberal as opposed to Ultra conservative.
Noted you added "Ultra".
Come out of the shadows of the liberal closet where we can see you better...you are defending the entire "liberal label" now anyway. Declare yourself...be free, be strong in your manhood, swing that axe liberally. Live up to your chosen name. Isolate and specify "it".
---Trav on 2/20/15


"Leon: 'When will you mischievous children (Jeery, Jedie, Travesty, Hazard) stop the labeling & name calling?'
What a paragon of hypocrisy! I have never seen a better example of a person committing the very act he condemns in the same sentence.

ROFL!"---jerry6593 on 2/20/15

Rolling On the Floor LYING! Yep, that's you Jeery! :) John 8:44
---Leon on 2/20/15


Leon: "When will you mischievous children (Jeery, Jedie, Travesty, Hazard) stop the labeling & name calling?"


What a paragon of hypocrisy! I have never seen a better example of a person committing the very act he condemns in the same sentence.

ROFL!



---jerry6593 on 2/20/15


StrongAxe. There's a very big difference between helping the genuine poor as opposed to creating a system that encourages people to be lazy and rely on welfare.

In Australia one politician said that welfare was destroying Aborigines. She suggested that they should be encouraged and helped to work and thus develop self esteem which will overcome their many problems such a substance abuse, sexual abuse, violence, higher mortality rates etc.

That politician was vilified by hypocritical leftists as a racist.

But when an Aboriginal said the same thing 6 months later he was hailed as a wonderful insightful man, by the hypocritical leftists.
---Haz27 on 2/19/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Cash Advance


Trav:

You said: Liberal did mean one thing then and stands for abomination now as a belief.

No, it's only ultra-conservatives who cannot abide anyone believing in any way different that they do that consider it an abomination. They don't speak for the entire body of Christ. The Pharisees were similarly theologically rigid.
---StrongAxe on 2/19/15


Trav:
You said: And you can't find him witnessed scripturally as as liberal.
In his day, Jesus and his disciples were the liberals, and the Pharisees were the conservatives.
---StrongAxe on 2/18/15

You know what I was saying by your response.
Liberal did mean one thing then and stands for abomination now as a belief.
Christ didn't do abomination liberal.
It is a mark on "liberals" today being their chosen label. They view it holy, while conservatives have scriptures testifying it is unholy.
1Co_6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
---Trav on 2/19/15


Trav:
Today, conservatives are "theologically correct" and condemn anyone who believes otherwise...
Republicans are always gutting social programs that help the poor.
---StrongAxe on 2/18/15

There may be a difference between your "theologically correct" typification and those having all witnesses in scripture back the stand.
Scriptures condemn or sanctify.
Truth...there is only one.
Theologians studying the Bible for answers to their questions are found on this site. Seekers gradually find all truth. Non seekers grope for anything. Republicans have fed more poor than Democrats ever will. But then opinions are not proof. Your bias'd comment against Republicans is no proof either.
---Trav on 2/19/15


Trav:

You said: And you can't find him witnessed scripturally as as liberal.

Today, conservatives are "theologically correct" and condemn anyone who believes otherwise (e.g. note the constant whining about "liberals can't be Christians"). Republicans are always gutting social programs that help the poor.

2000 years ago, Pharisees were "theologically correct" and held the poor in contempt. Jesus and his disciples helped the poor, but didn't nitpick theology.

In his day, Jesus and his disciples were the liberals, and the Pharisees were the conservatives.
---StrongAxe on 2/18/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Credit Counseling


how do transgender people affect YOU personally?...NurseRob

In Australia, under our so called anti-discrimination laws, we're all affected by the gender confused.

One guy whose Facebook page revealed his Bible based objection to the behavior of the gender confused, is facing court due to complaints made by a gender confused serial litigant.

This guy is now facing the stresses and financial strain defending himself against evil anti-discrimination laws that discriminate against those who are not PC.

The gender confused are high up in the hierarchy of the PC caste system.
But those who are straight, white and Christian, for example, are at the opposite end of the PC caste system.



---Haz27 on 2/19/15


Trav:
Jesus stood silent before Pilate, which I guess makes him a liberal. Got it.
---StrongAxe on 2/18/15

You'd guess wrong. Got it and refunding, it doesn't fit.
Christ didn't say: "this is crazy stuff" Pilate. And you can't find him witnessed scripturally as as liberal.

Another thing. Jimbo isn't Christ. His statement didn't reflect anything Christ said or didn't say. Nor does your defense. That's what I'll keep from your "got it".
His remark sounded slanted towards the liberal. Righteous men are not afraid to speak up. Fearful and lukewarm are.
Pro_28:1 The wicked flee when no man pursueth: but the righteous are bold as a lion.
---Trav on 2/18/15


Nurse, perhaps you misunderstood the question. I'm talking restrooms at places like walmart where they are open, multiperson restrooms. Unisex single-person restrooms have existed for decades, as many buildings only have one restroom. I don't know anyone who is worried by those. I'm talking about the liberal movement to eliminate gender specifity in our culture as a whole. And yes, it does affect us all as all our lives and children are affected by the society in which we live. There are even those that oppose gender identification on birth certificates because the infant has not yet chosen which gender they want to be and it's unfair for doctors and parents to a gender to a child just because of their reproductive organs. God help us all.
---Jed on 2/18/15


When will you mischievous children (Jeery, Jedie, Travesty, Hazard) stop the labeling & name calling? That's not Christ-like! Also, don't forget to wipe, flush the toilet, wash your hands & turn out the light, & don't touch the door- handle/latch/knob before leaving the single occupant public restroom, PLEEZE!
---Leon on 2/18/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Debt Relief


Trav:

You said: We all see your speechless, which tags you to me being on the liberal left side.

Jesus stood silent before Pilate, which I guess makes him a liberal. Got it.
---StrongAxe on 2/18/15


Jed, are you confused yourself? First off, you are talking about two separate issues: gender-neutral restrooms and your so-called gender confusion movement. A gender-neutral restroom is simply one that can be used by both sexes. These apply to single stall restrooms. Of course, you RWNJs see it as a plot. You would rather make an issue where none exists. I guess youre so insecure in your own gender that you cant understand what the laws say. Tell me Jerry, just how do transgender people affect YOU personally?

Try Romans 14:4
---NurseRobert on 2/18/15


This is crazy stuff.
---Jimbo on 2/17/15

Wow...your opinion will make all the difference.
I mean if you don't have an opinion...which you do but, are afraid to give.
We all see your speechless, which tags you to me being on the liberal left side.
Are you "neutral" gender as in "lukewarm"?
Rev_3:16 So then because thou art lukewarm, and neither cold nor hot, I will spue thee out of my mouth.

This sums up the disgust very well for P.C. eunuchs.
---Trav on 2/18/15


Nurse: What is a "non-started"

Your hero B.O. has steadily marched our proud nation on a downward spiral to a Communist dictatorship. What makes you LWNJs think that you will be spared in the coming oppression that is the end result of such systems? History teaches us that ALL socially engineered societies destroy themselves and ultimately murder millions in their purges.

Gender neutral restrooms is but a natural outgrowth of the Godless, perverse, liberal, Communist mindset.




---jerry6593 on 2/18/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Debt Settlement


This is crazy stuff.
---Jimbo on 2/17/15


"RWNJs"

That sounds like a mythical adaptation of the real life LWNJs.
---Jed on 2/17/15


NurseRoberts, I think we'd all love to hear your opinion on the gender confusion movement. And I'm sure they are scripture based?
---Jed on 2/17/15

Me too.
What say ye nurse of the suppressed no longer?
Be free...sing your heart out.

125 words available you don't have to use acronyms. You can if want like, YLLO.
---Trav on 2/17/15


The Communists have re-labelled themselves as progressives now, and are found often amongst the Dem's and probably sometimes even the Rep's. They also dominate the mainstream media and even the education system.
---Haz27 on 2/16/15

You are absolutely correct. They dominate the Democrats. It was heartening to see the Sheep actually vote out some of the most blatant in your face idiots this last go around. America is starting to wake up...but, this new generation is clueless. With no guidance from the fathers. Partly sign of our successes. Similar of King Solomons kids. Power mad idiots who set in motion the division of the Kingdom of Israel.
---Trav on 2/17/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Distance Learning


NurseRoberts, I think we'd all love to hear your opinion on the gender confusion movement. And I'm sure they are scripture based?
---Jed on 2/17/15


Another non-started by the RWNJs
---NurseRobert on 2/17/15

Scripturally these "Right" wingers have a bright expectation where scripturaly the LWAG's have a dismal expectation. Left Wing Anything Goes, hit the lowest Chart point first in Sodom and Gomorrah. Which is still being discussed several thousand years later. Except by your buddies.
1Co_6:9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind,
---Trav on 2/17/15


Another non-started by the RWNJs
---NurseRobert on 2/17/15


Jed. That documentary I mentioned Agenda: Grinding America down revealed from some sources such as a book titled The Naked Communist from decades ago, how same gender issues was listed as one of the key points the Communists planned to use to gradually break down western family, society and Christian values.

The Communists have re-labelled themselves as progressives now, and are found often amongst the Dem's and probably sometimes even the Rep's. They also dominate the mainstream media and even the education system. Is it any wonder that such gender neutral restrooms are being forced onto society by an activist progressive judiciary.
---Haz27 on 2/16/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Education


"Our restrooms at home are gender neutral and everyone in the home uses them, and we don't complain about that." Sorry Candice but I find that comment totally ridiculous. There is a long list of things people do in the privacy of one's own home which we would not be happy doing in public.

You will only have people you trust in your own home but you will not be surrounded by such people in public places.

There will surely be 'casualties' from these changes and then people will wake up and smell the coffee.
---Rita_H on 2/17/15


Hazy27. Yeah, one person restrooms aren't a problem. No need to be gender specific there. Lots of businesses only have one restroom for everyone, not a problem if it is one-person with a locking door.

Recently in Colorado, a 1st grader boy's family sued the school to let him use the girl's restroom because he wants to be a girl. They won and now the other 1st grade girls have to share the bathroom with a boy (multi-person bathrooms). All because the court ruled that gender identity was discriminatory.
---Jed on 2/16/15


Jed. We have one person restrooms in some public parks in Brisbane Australia. They lock from the inside.

It works ok and no problems so far.

I understand the term restroom being just a single toilet facility only. But since you mention lockers, then no we don't have gender neutral restrooms with lockers, etc.
---Haz27 on 2/16/15


FWIW, at the nephrology clinic I attend, the restrooms are for either, and they lock from the inside.
---Cluny on 2/16/15

Well being that you're from the most confused part of the country about their own sexual orientation. This makes sense.
I can see where you could go either way by what you defend or don't.
Women who were born women usually prefer their own facility's. Where the seat is always down and typically un-sprinkled.
---Trav on 2/16/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Home Equity Loans


Mary I agree with you 100%. This is asking for trouble. We live in a sick society and must do all we can to protect ourselves and our children.
---Rita_H on 2/16/15


From what i understand its a single restroom not many with many stalls. So to me because it does lock from the inside it doesn't matter. Our restrooms at home are gender neautral & everyone in the home uses them, & we dont complain about that. Now if they did make the bigger restrooms mixed yes i would have a problem.
---candice on 2/16/15


FWIW, at the nephrology clinic I attend, the restrooms are for either, and they lock from the inside.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 2/16/15


Haz27, are those restrooms at the parks you speak of one-person or family restrooms with a locking door, or are they open multi-person restrooms?
---Jed on 2/16/15


Read These Insightful Articles About Interest Rates


Another goofy liberal idea.
---Press_On on 2/16/15


We already have some gender neutral restrooms at some public parks here in Australia.

It's not really a problem from what I can see so far.

But I guess it depends on who is driving it. If it's being pushed by the PC progressives then there may well be a more sinister motivation behind it.
---Haz27 on 2/15/15


I think it's disgusting and can potentially lead to even more rapes--really!
---Mary on 2/15/15


Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.