ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Prayer For Dallas Police

I am a Black Hispanic and love Police Officers!
Many prayers for the Dallas.
All Lives Matters!

Don't you think from this point that the Police Officers should wear Military Gear at all protest events?

Because Blue Lives matter just much as Black Lives matter.

Join Our Free Penpals and Take The Fasting Bible Quiz
 ---Nicole_Lacey on 7/8/16
     Helpful Blog Vote (3)

Post a New Blog



Do you know how many times the States sued the Federal Government within the last 8 years and WON?
No. How often have they been successful?---StrongAxe on 7/31/16

Last count it is 22.
A lot of minor stuff, but still unlawful.

I will have to get back with you for the CORRECT number.

I am only counting Obama's unlawful actions.
---Nicole_Lacey on 8/3/16


Jerry, I see you are back to the silly name calling. Why don't you just grow up and remember for what true purpose this website was actually designed?

Nicole, you are quite correct. ALL lives should be as important as all others are. Until people give respect it will rarely be returned.

Sadly this very website is not showing a very good example of what respect means these days.

Yes, the police do need to be equipped better for the job they do.
---Rita_H on 8/3/16


jerry6593:

Wow! TWO ad-hominem attacks in one sentence!

Government has authority we, as citizens, give it. If we give it power to enslave us, it gains that power, not through totalitarianism, but through legitimate democratic process. We also have the power, through that same process, to take that power away from it.

Yes, "when guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." Still, if it's harder for ANYONE to purchase guns, it's also harder for criminals to get them. Gun violence in the U.S. is higher than in any other civilized country. Why is that? If not by laws, it must be because Americans, the most Christian people on earth, are most trigger-happy? What does that say about Christianity?
---StrongAxe on 8/3/16


StrangeAct: You make a good Communist. The government works for us - not the other way around.

I challenge you to invent a gun law that would have saved the victims of these mass shootings. You can't, because the argument is flawed. Gun laws, like any laws, only work for the law-abiding, and terrorists thugs don't obey the laws - any laws. It should be obvious to even dull-minded Communists that all the well-intended gun control legislation foisted upon the citizenry has not done ANY good thus far - NONE.



---jerry6593 on 8/3/16


Nicole_Lacey:

You wrote: Congress are Representatives of ALL the States.
The Federal Government is NOT Congress.


Congress is the part of the federal government, that has the power to legislate - to create laws and approve certain other things. The executive and judiciary are the other two parts.

We control the Government, not the Government controls us.

Unless the representatives we elect to Congress pass laws that allow the government to control us. Most of the laws Congress passes regulate what we are and are not allowed to do.

Do you know how many times the States sued the Federal Government within the last 8 years and WON?

No. How often have they been successful?
---StrongAxe on 7/31/16




Withdrawing from the Union is not permitted under the Constitution, without approval of Congress..How is it different?--StrongAxe

Correct, thus the Civil War.

Congress are Representatives of ALL the States.
The Federal Government is NOT Congress.

Congress gave President Lincoln permission to fight those States who left the Union.

Lincoln used Solidiers from the States who sent their Representatives to Congress. The Union Troops were made up of States Soldiers.

Our Country is BY the People for the People.

We control the Government, not the Government controls us.

Do you see the differences?
Do you know how many times the States sued the Federal Government within the last 8 years and WON?
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/22/16


I think Police officers should be wearing vests all the time.

The Government of the United states is elected to office by the people. Our representatives are supposed to vote for what was best for their voters and the United States.

In the days before the Civil War the southern Representatives only considered their best for their rich voters and not that of the Country. Nor the poor people. Which is why slave holders of more then 6 slaves didn't have to serve in the war. Just the poor.

This country is almost as divided then as now. With the Republican only considering was is best for their party and the rich and not the United States.
---Samuelbb7 on 7/22/16


\\You wrote: When the Federal Gov did ABOLISH Slaves, the Southern States withdrew from the Union. Thus the Civil War.\\

Nicole, the Federal Government did not abolish slavery until AFTER the Civil War.

One of the conditions for a southern state to be readmitted into the union was to ratify the 13th Amendment which abolished slavery.

Again, this was not passed until AFTER the Civil War.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/22/16


Nicole_Lacey:

You wrote: When the Federal Gov did ABOLISH Slaves, the Southern States withdrew from the Union. Thus the Civil War.

Withdrawing from the Union is not permitted under the Constitution, without approval of Congress.

This isn't Canada nor the United Kingdom.

If the Government gives you rights It can take them away.


How is it different? You used to have the right to own slaves, discriminate against other races, and consume cocaine, none of which you can do today because of federal laws. Other countries can similarly grant and take away rights.
---StrongAxe on 7/21/16


Yes you are correct Darlene.
There were Slaves all in the Northern States, but those states started to abolishing slavery State by State.
So the Slaves ran towards the North.

Sadly, the North agreed to return any run away Slave, So the Slaves kept ran until they reach Canada.

Canada refused to turn over the Slaves and made them FREE with FEAR.

But, so many are so confused about the 3/5 person law.

Without that law, the South would had more Representatives in Congress than the North.

Could you have image what kind of Laws would have pass?

3/5 law limited Slave States in Congress. THANK GOD!
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/21/16




We are not a Socialist Country. The Federal Government has to WORK with the States

10th 'Amendment reads, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are RESERVED to the States, respectively, or to the PEOPLE." Under the United States Constitution, there are certain provisions that place responsibility or authoritative powers to the Federal government.

When the Federal Gov did ABOLISH Slaves, the Southern States withdrew from the Union. Thus the Civil War.

This isn't Canada nor the United Kingdom.

If the Government gives you rights It can take them away.

CHIPPING AWAY is better than complaining and fussing.

ACTION IS NEEDED!
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/21/16


Nicole Lacey So sorry but there were Black Slaves in New York in fact some helped build New York. You may have done this already but I found it interesting. Research "Slavery in America",I pulled up "Slavery in America Historical Overview" which showed the beginning of slavery in America by the years and it began early,at first 1620 Jamestown,they were called indentured servants and freed after they worked off money owed for their passage or something else. I was surely enlightened about the process in America.
---Darlene_1 on 7/21/16


Nicole_Lacey:

You wrote: The North did do that. Read history Black people were not slaves in the North.

On a state-by-state basis, but not on a federal basis. The federal government permitted slave ownership in the south.

Do you understand how our congress work?

Yes, I do. There are similar representational systems in other countries as well.

The solution was the 3/5 law. it was a start that chipped away slavery.

Yes, it was a start, but an imperfect one (that was eventually abolished a century later).
---StrongAxe on 7/21/16


What did you want the North to do?
Disallowing slavery altogether would have been a good start. They tried!

The North did do that. Read history Black people were not slaves in the North.

Do you understand how our congress work?
We 535 members 100 senate 435 for the house.
435 delegates are divided according to the population of each state. The numbers change for each state all the time. some get more, other states get less.

The North had more people. So the South wanted to count the slaves in order to vote to keep them slaves.

The solution was the 3/5 law. it was a start that chipped away slavery.
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/20/16


Nicole_Lacey:

White people can't understand laws about blacks? You're a woman. Does that mean you can't understand laws about men?

The law doesn't MAKE Black people less of a human. IT HAS NO POWER!

I as talking about value under U.S. law, not intrinsic value. The law said slavery was legal (and allowed Northern police to enforce southern slave ownership). That doesn't mean it was OK with God either.

What did you want the North to do?

Disallowing slavery altogether would have been a good start.


Jerry6593 wrote: Current gun laws require background checks.

Then why does the NRA fight so hard when anyone tries to pass stricter background check laws?
---StrongAxe on 7/20/16


StrongAxe, I am Black not you and I understand the wisdom of the 3/5 law. You don't because I guess you are White.

The law doesn't MAKE Black people less of a human. IT HAS NO POWER!

GOD made us human no matter what law is passed!

Is an aborted baby any less of a human than me because the LAW states so? NO!

We tried to abolish abortion all together. IT ISN'T WORKING.

So now we are trying to CHIP away this horrific lawful action little by little.
Just like the 3/5 law.
It's a tactic, method and slowly it will PREVAIL as the ending of Slavery.

What did you want the North to do? Allow the South to count the Slaves as 1?

Because 0 wasn't an OPTION!

REALITY!
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/20/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Mortgages


Axer: "Many mass shooters would have had trouble getting weapons if background checks (which NRA opposes) were done."

You need to stop lying. Current gun laws require background checks. Criminals and terrorists have no problem getting illegal weapons illegally. It is only the law-abiding that are punished in Democrat America.



---Jerry6593 on 7/20/16


Jerry6593:

You wrote: This is all lies. This is the bearing of false witness that you accuse me of.

The commandment forbids bearing false witness against your neigbor. Lies were reprehensible, but not actionable. Testimony directly accusing another WAS actionable and bore a penalty of double damages.

Laying aside its truthfulness, which you dispute, neither the report I quoted, nor my quoting of it, accuses you, nor anyone else of any offence. You, on the other hand, explicitly accused me of worshiping Obama, a violation of the first commandment, but a lie (hence your commandment violation)

Many mass shooters would have had trouble getting weapons if background checks (which NRA opposes) were done.
---StrongAxe on 7/19/16


Axster: "It's been shown that mass shootings are lower when access to guns is harder. Pro-NRA Republicans have more guns than pro-gun-control Democrats."

This is all lies. This is the bearing of false witness that you accuse me of. Thus, you are a hypocrite as well as a liar. Murder rates are highest where gun laws are most restrictive (ref. Chicago & DC). Most all of the mass-murder shooters have been registered Democrats - not NRA Republicans. Your adherence to false left-wing narratives shows a cult-worship following rather than fact-centered reasoned conclusions.


---Jerry6593 on 7/19/16


Jerry6593:

Again with the ad-hominem attacks. Don't you ever give up? Remember, slander violates "Thou shalt not bear false witness", but you never let that stop you.

Yes, I'm Canadian. I cared enough about this country to learn about it and actually move here, and lived half my life here. I know more about American Constitution and civics than the average American (and many lawmakers, given the assinine unconstitutional laws they frequently try to pass again and again).

I do not worship Obama (accusing me of violating the 1st commandment? slander!) It's been shown that mass shootings are lower when access to guns is harder. Pro-NRA Republicans have more guns than pro-gun-control Democrats.
---StrongAxe on 7/18/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Personal Loans


Nicole_Lacey:

You wrote: 3/5 benefitted the Slaves!

Not as much as freedom would have. In fact, having more representatives just perpetuated their state of slavery.

Was 3/5 better than 0? Yes. Was it worse than 1? Yes. If the constitution had been truly fair, slaves would not have been allowed to be property at all, and both whites and blacks would have been allocated the same values. That inequity had to fester for a century before the civil war finally dealt with it.
---StrongAxe on 7/17/16


Nicole: Don't expect StrongAxe to know our Constitution or our history, as he is a Canadian. He is also a left-wing liberal Obama worshiper who thinks that guns are the problem - not the Democrat and Muslim kooks that wield them.


---Jerry6593 on 7/17/16


It said slaves are worth 3/5 of others.--StrongAxe

Many people DON'T understand that law. Please read all the surroundings of that 3/5 worth of a Slave law.

Slave owners in the South wanted to count their Slaves in their state to boost their representatives in Congress.

The North reminded the South they claim Slaves are property.
The North came back stating they can count their property as well. (Chairs, Desk and etc.)

After arguing the point, the North were only capable for demising a Slave to 3/5.

Why would a Slave be willing to be counted as equal to a full White Southern Man in order to strengthen the South in Congress in order to keep him a Slave forever?

3/5 benefitted the Slaves!
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/16/16


Jerry6593:

You wrote: Weak Hatchet: Go back to Canada.

Are you capable of rational discussion without constant ad-hominem attacks? It appears not. Grow up.

2nd amendment says the right to bear arms shall not be infringed BECAUSE a well-regulated militia is necessary. They would not have needed to say that, if there were other implied legitimate reasons to bear arms.

We are discussing what the constitution actually says and means, not "reasonable policy". It said slaves are worth 3/5 of others. That was the law, but not reasonable.

To remove Muslims or left-wing Democrats, you must first repeal the First Amendment. You're welcome to try. But that will also endanger Christians. Do you want that?
---StrongAxe on 7/16/16


Send a Free Just Because Ecard


Weak Hatchet: Go back to Canada. There aren't as many guns there. For your information, the words "to form a militia" do not appear in the US Constitution. The militia is just one of the reasons we retain our God-given right to self-protection. Throughout history, when guns are removed from the people, an iron-fisted police state follows.

Have you noticed that in all recent cases of mass murder the shooter is either a Muslim or a left-wing Democrat? Maybe we should ban both groups from America.



---Jerry6593 on 7/16/16


Monk_Brendan:

You wrote: I thought Protestants didn't like WORKS!

Protestants don't have anything against works. They just believe that salvation itself is dependant on faith alone, and not works. James himself said that good works necessarily proceed from good faith (and give evidence of it). However, it is the underlying faith itself that saves, not the works that proceed from it. In much the same way, pain is a symptom of disease, but not a disease in and of itself, and pain won't kill you, but the disease that causes it might.
---StrongAxe on 7/16/16


Leon said, "Monk: If you really want to speak out against stupidity, stop being argumentative & just plain CRASS. "Action" speaks louder than words."

Leon, of course, being the absolute arbiter of style, and can tell you what is CRASS.

Leon, I thought Protestants didn't like WORKS!
---Monk_Brendan on 7/14/16


Jerry6593:

Those thoughts are all laudable, but not constitutional, as they were not placed in either its body nor its preamble. It's curious that these very same founders, when they drafted the Bill of Rights, chose to explicitly mention a specific purpose for the right to bear arms - i.e. to form a militia, yet they did not mention the right to take up arms against an disagreeable government. If they had intended unrestricted use of arms, why would they have put the militia clause in there in the first place? They did not place similar clauses in any of the other amendments.

Also, "keeping their own arms" doesn't necessarily mean parading them all over town whenever you choose, nor aiming them at people you don't like.
---StrongAxe on 7/14/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Auto Insurance


///...I know I am not on the level of the Supreme Court. But this answer just proves you don't have a snappy (or even Christian) comeback for me, so you tell me to go away.

If you want to ignore me, fine! But I will continue to speak out against STUPIDITY whenever and where ever I can.---Monk_Brendan on 7/14/16///

Monk: If you really want to speak out against stupidity, stop being argumentative & just plain CRASS. "Action" speaks louder than words.
---Leon on 7/14/16


Leon said, "Monk: I won't debate the matter with you. You seem to think you're on par with Supreme Court Justices. Go with your opinion down a rabbit hole if you want."

I know I am not on the level of the Supreme Court. But this answer just proves you don't have a snappy (or even Christian) comeback for me, so you tell me to go away.

If you want to ignore me, fine! But I will continue to speak out against STUPIDITY whenever and where ever I can.
---Monk_Brendan on 7/14/16


The Second Amendment says what it says.

However, I'm pro-choice on this matter.

I choose not to have firearms.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/14/16


///...Your ignorance...knows no bounds. Go back to Canada if you don't like the US. We...America[ns] retain our God-given rights not to hunt or to join a militia, but as a last resort against tyranny by the government. [?]

The US populace is THE greatest standing army on earth, and our private gun ownership is the reason our country has not been overtly invaded.[?]...

Leon: You're not playing nice.---Jerry6593 on 7/13/16///

Jerry: I'm not playing nice?! You know what Jesus said about a log being in the eye? Well bud, you have giant Sequoia trees in both of your eyes. Truly Sad!

Militia is no longer relevant? Tell that to states national guards. You're the BRAIN DEAD, "ignore & rant" one Jeery!
---Leon on 7/13/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Holidays


Axey: Study our founders.

"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." - Thomas Jefferson, Virginia Constitution, Draft 1, 1776

"I prefer dangerous freedom over peaceful slavery."-Jefferson, letter to James Madison, January 30, 1787

"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." -Jefferson, letter to James Madison, December 20, 1787

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samuel Adams, Massachusetts Ratifying Convention, 1788

---Jerry6593 on 7/14/16


///...4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, suppor-ted by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This means [?!]... the "undercover" officer has to have probable cause to record the daily doings of a beat cop. To indiscriminately do so, without probable cause is illegal.---Monk_ Brendan on 7/13/16///

Monk: I won't debate the matter with you. You seem to think you're on par with Supreme Court Justices. Go with your opinion down a rabbit hole if you want.
---Leon on 7/13/16


Jerry6593:

I know more civics than many natural born American citizens. I never said I don't like it here.

The second amendment mentions militias but NOT resort against government tyranny. If you own a gun not for militias but against the government, you are subverting both letter and spirit of the second amendment.


Monk_Brendan:

That only applies to searches (i.e. looking at something that is not in plain view). A policeman can't arrest you for something in your trunk, without a warrant. He CAN, arrest you for something in your car visible through a window, because by allowing it to be visible, you're voluntarily allowing anyone (including police) to see it.
---StrongAxe on 7/13/16


Here is the 4th Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

This means that the "undercover" officer has to have probable cause to record the daily doings of a beat cop. To indiscriminately do so, without probable cause is illegal.
---Monk_Brendan on 7/13/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Health Insurance


///...Leon it was the word "undercover" that got me thinking about Big Brother. If a police sergeant is undercover, he is not "supervising." He is covertly watching other police in the following of their duties, and recording those actions without their permission.[?] That is illegal search & seizure, according to the definition of the Constitution.---Monk_Brendan on 7/13/16///

No Monk, that's according to your made up definition of the Constitution. The word "undercover" caused you to bug out? Bosses "legally" do that all the time whether it be on the job or monitoring social media activities of their EMPLOYEES. Ask your superiors!
---Leon on 7/13/16


\\Axey: "it is for the purpose of maintaining a militia - which is no longer relevant"
\\

This is EXACTLY what the Second Amendment says.

When did you last read the Constitution, Jeery?

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/13/16


Axey: "it is for the purpose of maintaining a militia - which is no longer relevant"

Your ignorance of our country knows no bounds. Go back to Canada if you don't like the US. We the people of America retain our God-given rights not to hunt or to join a militia, but as a last resort against tyranny by the government.

The US populace is THE greatest standing army on earth, and our private gun ownership is the reason our country has not been overtly invaded. The discord brought by the left-wing funded BLM terrorists is an attempt to destroy us from within.



Leon: You're not playing nice.



---Jerry6593 on 7/13/16


Leon said, "Monk: What part of "supervise" don't you understand? Illegal search & seizure? HUH?!"

Leon it was the word "undercover" that got me thinking about Big Brother. If a police sergeant is undercover, he is not "supervising." He is covertly watching other police in the following of their duties, and recording those actions without their permission. That is illegal search & seizure, according to the definition of the Constitution.
---Monk_Brendan on 7/13/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Dating


///Leon states, "John: Your stats are incorrect."

Sir, have you taken a look at the 2016 stats?

I also stated since Obama came in to office that 58% of "Blacks." are on Food Stamps (over all)
---john9346 on 7/12/16///

Sir, please refer me to your 2016 source & I'd be glad to review them. Yeah, I heard what you said the first time about "58% of Blacks" being on food stamps. What exactly do you mean by "all over"? What is your source?
---Leon on 7/12/16


Monk_Brendan:

Patrolling is only illegal if it's in an area where police are not permitted, either implicitly (e.g. private property not visible from public property) or explicitly (e.g. denied permission to search).

Open carry WAS allowed 2000 years ago - Jesus told his apostles to sell their exrta cloak and buy a sword. Also, the 2nd amendment is qualified with a phrase indicating that it is for the purpose of maintaining a militia - which is no longer relevant, as all city, state, and federal governments now have their own armies and police forces, so private militias are no longer conscripted.
---StrongAxe on 7/12/16


///...[you're] talking Big Brother...---Monk_Brendan on 7/12/16///

Monk: What part of "supervise" don't you understand? Illegal search & seizure? HUH?!

The 2d amendment speaks of a well regulated militia. We currently have states national guard units. It also guarantees citizens the right to own firearms. Since then a lot has changed. They didn't have grocery stores or supermarkets. They occasionally had to shoot wild game for nourishment & raw materials vital to their day-to-day existence. And, it was necessary to own guns also for personal & property protection since there were no established police forces.

Big Brother? Oh brother!!! You obviously didn't understand what I said. smh
---Leon on 7/12/16


While contemplating this situation, what comes to mind is the fact that calamity will surely pursue and overtake the wicked, and those who sow hate or harm will be punished, for whatsoever a man sows, that shall he also reap. That is the reality, and something for both our young people who would do harm, and the police that are taking their lives to consider. I realize that not all who are being murdered are sowing evil, and I do consider that good people are dying unjustly, and often before what seems to be their time. But what most seem to fail to realize, consider, or understand, is that Father is protecting them from the evil to come, and preserving the wicked for the day of judgement. Father's will, will be done, it is for us to trust Him.
---joseph on 7/12/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Health Treatments


Thankyou Sis.Chria9396 good reply!!
Also agree with Darlene 1
You are exactly right,thankyou for your encouraging answer we need to be prayerful in this whole situation.God help us all,be seeking His face....sincerely Elena95555
---Elena_95555 on 7/12/16


Hatred stirs up more hate,yet
Love opens a door to wisdom and understanding and eventually moving toward forgiveness....
Love of JesusChrist!!!
---Elena_95555 on 7/12/16


Leon said, "2.) There needs to be undercover police units daily patrolling, using vehicle & body cams to better supervise on duty patrol officers."

First, Leon, this is illegal search and seizure, and as such unconstitutional.

"Private citizens "open carry" of guns, especially military-styled assault weapons, is insane!!!"

While I agree with you on this point, I have problems with your argument. The 2nd Amendment to the Constitution says what it says, and US Legislators cannot change that by themselves. They would need to amend the constitution and repeal that phrase.

Anyway, you are talking Big Brother, totalitarian rule if we follow your thought to the extreme.
---Monk_Brendan on 7/12/16


Leon states, "John: Your stats are incorrect."

Sir, have you taken a look at the 2016 stats?

I also stated since Obama came in to office that 58% of "Blacks." are on Food Stamps (over all)
---john9346 on 7/12/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Affiliate Program


///Since Obama's Election, 58% of "Blacks." are on "Food Stamps."...---john9346 on 7/12/16///

John: Your stats are incorrect. Nationally, most of the people who receive benefits from the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program are white. According to 2013 data from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which administers the program, 40.2 percent of SNAP recipients are white, 25.7 percent are black, 10.3 percent are Hispanic, 2.1 percent are Asian and 1.2 percent are Native American.
---Leon on 7/12/16


What comes to mind concerning this is

"let us consider how to stir up one another to love and good works" ESV Heb 10:24

"Let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works" KJV Heb 10:24

I think this could apply to how individuals or groups on whatever sides of an issue could or should be encouraged.
---chria9396 on 7/12/16


NICE TRY, StrongAxe.
Truly that is the BEST response someone has given the runners

But, video footage proves OPPOSITE!

The So call hypocrites were against police cars and bending lower than the Police Officers for more protection. (1st protection was to protest in peace)

Many DID run towards Officers lending against them until the Officers gave them the signal to run away some more.

Please listen to the BLACK Lady who got shot in the leg and covering her BLACK Son.
SHE SAID A POLICE OFFICER SAVED HER AND HER SON.
She also PRAISED the Police.

She was in a wheelchair in front of the media as she praised them.

NO FEAR in her eyes. But COMPLETE GRATITUDE!

Anyway, nice try StrongAxe. Really
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/12/16


The real issue is the "Unemployment." among my race of men, the poverty leads to crime. The police is left to clean up/fixthe a Failed Demographic System of which they are not equipped to do nor should they attempt to do.

The police is not racist,however, their job is arduous do to politicians who will not truly help, "Poor Blacks."

Since Obama's Election, 58% of "Blacks." are on "Food Stamps."

TAVIS SMILEY said, "Sadly, and it pains me to say this, over the last decade black folk, in the era of Obama have lost ground in every major economic category. Not one, two or three [categories], but every major economic category, black americans have lost ground..."
---john9346 on 7/12/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Abortion Facts


\\Documentation in the actual court cases, that's what. \\

Have you read the actual court documents, Jerry?

Or are you just going by what someone told you?

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/12/16


"If police departments, nationwide, would do away with the code of silence, that would go a very long way towards fixing the system of protecting every U.S. citizen (to include the good, honorable police officers who truly do "serve & protect").
---Leon on 7/11/16"

I agree. Instead of being condemned or ridiculed as "snitches" or code breakers, those who would come forth as witnesses against the corruption of "rogue cops" should be commended. However that will never happen because of the of the so called "blue wall" that could only be in place to protect and defend the corrupt. Why? The law, and the penalty for breaking it, should start in the house of those paid to enforce it.
---joseph on 7/12/16


I applaud the good police officers nationwide. But, the problem is within law enforcement environment is the gang mentality "CODE OF SILENCE". This code protects the bad apple cops & intimidates the good cops. Gang mentality says it's taboo to be a "snitch", right or wrong, & has serious consequences for cops who come forward with the truth about wrong doing within their departments.

If police departments, nationwide, would do away with the code of silence, that would go a very long way towards fixing the system of protecting every U.S. citizen (to include the good, honorable police officers who truly do "serve & protect").
---Leon on 7/11/16


Nicole_Lacey:

One politician called protesters hypocrites for running - expecting to be saved by police they were protesting. If they expected police help, they would run TOWARDS them for protection. They ran away because they DIDN'T trust them.

Sniper shot police not civilians - safest place was far away from police.

If you legally open carry and shots ring out, running towards police with your gun is suicidal. One guy knew that, surrendered, got plastered over media as a suspect, and now gets death threats from clueless zealots.

Even though Dallas police were noble and courageous, that doesn't change public perception of police everywhere (e.g. Minnesota, Baton Rouge) that some police are trigger-happy and racist.
---StrongAxe on 7/11/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Acne Treatment


///Leon wrOTe: "This is where (the state of mind) Jerry & Steveng are at mentally & spiritually. I pray they'll repent of their sins & God will restore them to their right minds."

Please specifically list the sins that I am accused of.
---Steveng on 7/10/16///

Slanderous, false allegations Steveng.
---Leon on 7/10/16


Leon wrOTe: "This is where (the state of mind) Jerry & Steveng are at mentally & spiritually. I pray they'll repent of their sins & God will restore them to their right minds."

Please specifically list the sins that I am accused of.
---Steveng on 7/10/16


All Black lives Protestors RAN away as the Police Officers ran TOWARDS the shots!

The Protestors were asking for help from the very people they were protecting against. REALLY?

Someone please answer this:
Since the Protestors believe that the Police don't care about them and WANT them dead.

Why did the Police Officers ran to the line of fire to protect the ones they so call hate???

The Police could have allow the idiot to shoot them since after all they both wanted them dead.

Do you all see how silly that sounds?

So are the Protestors!
Even they know the Police Officers cared about them and did what they were getting paid to do.

SERVE AND PROTECT EVEN UNTIL DEATH.
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/10/16


I usually try to be polite and considerate but frankly it's time for Christians to SHUT UP about all the white black thing and pray for both. God will not hear prayers prayed in contention. Peace, and growing nearer to God in prayer and praise will accomplish a lot more with God than Christians fussing about who did what. Love is needed in this Country and love can't grow in the middle of confusion. If we don't love one another then Satan has gained a foothold. I hate prejudice of any kind it is the Devils tool. We must carry God's weapon,His Word remember Love God and your neighbor. Get busy praying and think pure thoughts. What you do you will get back.
---Darlene_1 on 7/10/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Bad Credit Loans


Cognitive dissonance:

The state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change.

This is where (the state of mind) Jerry & Steveng are at mentally & spiritually. I pray they'll repent of their sins & God will restore them to their right minds.
---Leon on 7/10/16


Jerry6593:

You wrote:

Documentation in the actual court cases, that's what.

Freddie Gray. What is a lie? Please be more specific. That he existed? Or that he died while being transported in an ambulance? Or that his injuries occurred there? The medical examiner said they did.

Philando Castile. Killed while reaching for his wallet, as requested by police.

Alton Sterling. Shot after already being pinned to the ground. Are these lies too?

You leftist socialists aren't interested the truth, but rather the advancement of your misguided ideology.

How are you rightist capitalists any different?
---StrongAxe on 7/10/16


Axster: "And what supernatural fountain of wisdom taught you that?"

Documentation in the actual court cases, that's what. You are such a slave to edited propaganda that you miss the truth. You leftist socialists aren't interested the truth, but rather the advancement of your misguided ideology.



---Jerry6593 on 7/10/16


Satan is deceiving the whole world and doing everything he can to destroy God's creation.

It is known that more white people have been killed by police officers than blacks, but it seems only the black killings are getting the media attention. Is there an agenda by the government and media?

Governments all throughout history have used false flags to achieve certain agendas. The FBI and the CIA have been caught instigating certain events by using "crises actors."

Is the Obama Administration causing friction between races to start a civil war thus instilling martial law and, in turn, keeping Obama in office (he stated this in his college essay about getting rid of the twenty second amendment).
---Steveng on 7/10/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Bankruptcy


\\Travon Martin (Sanford) was a lie. Michael Brown (St. Louis) was a lie. Freddie Gray (Baltimore) was a lie. Your entire thesis is based on lies\\

Are you saying these people did not exist?

Nicole, Phoenix police wore riot gear during the supposedly peaceful protest Friday night.

But then the organizer said he was changing the previously approved route to block one of the freeways.

At that point, some of the protesters got rowdy, throwing rocks and bricks at the police, especially as they were then ordered to disperse.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/10/16


Jerry6593:

Yes, yes, the tired old "everything is Obama's fault" rhetoric. When did Obama say "take up arms against whitey"? Yet on a daily basis we are seeing cases where white police officers shoot and kill unarmed (or legally armed) black civilians, and also on a daily basis, cases where armed white people actually take up arms against police, and are arrested but not killed.

Travon Martin (Sanford) was a lie. Michael Brown (St. Louis) was a lie. Freddie Gray (Baltimore) was a lie. Your entire thesis is based on lies.

Oh really? And what supernatural fountain of wisdom taught you that? Were cell phone videos of cops murdering black people Hollywood fictions, or devil-created miracles?
---StrongAxe on 7/9/16


"Don't you think from this point that the Police Officers should wear Military Gear at all protest events?" I think police offices should stop doing that which warrants protest, or the need for such things as "military gear", and simply do the job that they are being paid for, which is to protect and serve. Deadly force by law enforcement is only necessary where deadly intent manifest itself against law enforcement. To apply it otherwise, is to invite retaliation or retribution.To do things that excite violence, is to do things that invite violence.
---joseph on 7/9/16


Axey: I disagree. The reason that cops are being targeted by blacks is because of Obama's inciting the liberal black base to riot with his divisive rhetoric. Travon Martin (Sanford) was a lie. Michael Brown (St. Louis) was a lie. Freddie Gray (Baltimore) was a lie. Your entire thesis is based on lies.

The Obama administration has blood on its hands for the senseless murder of brave policemen in Dallas and elsewhere.



---Jerry6593 on 7/9/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Cash Advance


Nicole said
//Don't you think from this point that the Police Officers should wear Military Gear at all protest events?Because Blue Lives matter just much as Black Lives matter.//
Nicole you are right on target.
Military gear makes a big difference.
Who would want to be a policeman today?
---michael_e on 7/9/16


I heard on a TV program the other day that there were 6,000 reported cases of excessive force used by police officers.

While this sounds like a lot (and one is too many!), there are 900,000 policemen in the USA.

So it's not even ONE PERCENT of those officers who are accused of using excessive force.

Glory to Jesus Christ!
---Cluny on 7/9/16


Strongaxe, White people are shot/killed twice more than Black people

Black persons are shot by Black/Hispanic Police Officers than White Officer.

Stop believing the American Media and Politicians. They don't care about Black Men! If they did they would have been marching and camping out in Chicago! Why aren't they?
Because Black men are the shooters!

62 Black men where shot over the 4th of July weekend. Over 3000 men died since January. It's safer for these men if they lived Afghanistan.

BTW, Afghanistan gets more media coverage of a death than Chicago!

My father, brothers, nephew and cousins live in Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, New York and have driven all over United States without one INCIDENT!
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/9/16


'Axe: I agree. A few actions are necessary towards fixing the problems:
1.) The law enforcement "Code of Silence" must end. Right is right, wrong is wrong, no matter who does it. Bad cops must be identified, not shielded, & be held accountable for wrong doing.
2.) There needs to be undercover police units daily patrolling, using vehicle & body cams to better supervise on duty patrol officers.
3.) There must be closer scrutiny of applicants who might be racial predator types & for military veterans who served in war zones & might suffer from PTSD. If PTSD "disabled" applicants are hired, they shouldn't be assigned street patrol duty, but instead should be employed in administrative duties ONLY.
---Leon on 7/9/16


Read These Insightful Articles About Credit Counseling


'Axe: I agree, continued:
4.) Per PTSD, many urban cops are in similar conditions as soldiers in Afghanistan & Iraq. daily, they spend long, physically & mentally exhausting hours patrolling streets. Due to existing "open carry" gun laws in the U.S., cops are hard pressed to distinguish between friendly & hostile citizens. Such stress is at the core of & also leads to PTSD.
5.) Private citizens "open carry" of guns, especially military-styled assault weapons, is insane!!! U.S. legislators should revise applicable laws, making it an automatic (mandatory) life sentence (without possibility of parole), or worst, for people convicted of maliciously harming & /or murdering others with such weapons.
---Leon on 7/9/16


The reason there is such deplorable violence against police as we have seen in Dallas is that many people are frustrated to the breaking point at those few police who ARE corrupt, and murder innocent people (predominantly blacks) and get away with it. This week alone there were several such cases, while there were many more similar cases where white people acted belligerent towards police, waving guns at them, and even shooting at them - and were arrested alive, rather than being turned into Swiss cheese, as would likely have happened if they had been black. The best way to stop violence against the police is for police to acct with accountability (including demanding that of their own), and stop giving people reasons to distrust and hate them.
---StrongAxe on 7/8/16


Cluny, the Dallas Police said they didn't wear any military gear in order NOT to offend the Protesters. Thus making them sitting ducks.

From this point, don't you think members of the Dallas Police department are going to demand proper protection during any rally?

Sadly, I know they wish they had yesterday.

Orlando Police had their military gear on last night.
---Nicole_Lacey on 7/8/16


Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.