ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

StrongAxe's Blog Replies
Post a New Blog

Vote on StrongAxe as a helpful ChristiaNet blogger by clicking this link. Currently StrongAxe has 1417 votes. The higher the number of votes the more helpful this blogger is considered by the ChristiaNet community.


Nation Of Israel
  
Trav:

I said: And where did I ever say otherwise?
Earlier, I said: How about the 144,000 witnesses, from every Jewish tribe
You said: There was only one, Judah.

I was merely referring to Rev. 7:4-8, in particular, Rev 7:5: Of the tribe of Juda were sealed twelve thousand.

Are you disputing Revelation? Because it mentions all of those tribes, not only Judah. But even so, if your contention is that Jews are Judah only, but are universally evil, how do you explain Rev 7:5? If you're trying to get at something else, what am I missing?

you must be human like the rest of us.

On this we can both agree.


Nation Of Israel
  
Trav:

You said: You are sifting gnats again.

It was a "by the way", not my main point.

Proper word for the application I used it in.

"Irregardless" is never proper, regardless of how often George W. Bush used it. "regardless" is the proper word with the same meaning.

Sifting others...can you sift your own scriptural error in your 144,000 statement above?

No. Please enlighten me.

Judah is one of 12 brothers. Each brother recognized by their own name. They are never collectively called "Judah".

And where did I ever say otherwise?


Nation Of Israel
  
Trav:

You said: Irregardless of Wiki or heritage...the real or imposter House of Judah, is still Anti-Christ after 2015 years.

(BTW, "regardless" is a word, while "irregardless" is not.)

Revelations confirms there are Judean imposters known by GOD.

How about the 144,000 witnesses, from every Jewish tribe, also mentioned in Revelation? Are they impostors too?


Nation Of Israel
  
Trav:

You said: I posted a reliable source on 21st.
The 13th Tribe, book of research done by "jewish" Arthur Koestler.


I mentioned this too, although for some mysterious reason, all the posts I made on the weekend seem to have gone into a black hole, even though the system said they were being held for approval.

His theory has been largely discredited. In fact, modern genetic analyses shows commonality among genes in Sephardi, Askenazi, and middle-eastern Jews (although this doesn't totally rule his theory out).


Worldwide Flood Of Noah
  
Lawrence:

You said to Samuelbb7: But you and others keep digging in the Vast deceiving trinity pit trying to prove that which is Not, & has No parallel basis with The Word of God whatsoever.

And how about the scriptures YOU keep quoting ad nauseam?

Rev 17:4-6: scarlet harlot
Matt 7:13-14: strait gate
2 Co 17:14-15: satan as angel of light
John 10:1: enter via valid door

Note that NOT A SINGLE ONE of these scriptures even remotely deals with the idea of trinity. So which one of us is vainly searching for scriptures that prove what is Not?


Worldwide Flood Of Noah
  
Lawrence:

You said: S AActs 2, The Acts Church of The Living God, born on the day Pentecost.

Exactly! THOUSANDS OF YEARS of bible history happened (about 99% of it) BEFORE trinity was even an issue.

No place showing when the 3 persons godhead religion was found.

And there's no place the Bible doesnt say that death rays from Mars had no part in the death of Jesus Jesus either, but let's not let that stop us from jumping to totally unwarranted conclusions either.

The biblical standard for truth is 2-3 witnesses. 1 witness is hearsay. 0 witnesses is fiction. Try again please.


Worldwide Flood Of Noah
  
Lawrence:

You said: The Commandments Doctrines of men trinity... people dying perishing since day one of its existence, as if The Acts Church of The Living God never existed.

1) People have been dying since the beginning due to Adam's fall, not "commandments doctrines of men trinity" especially since the Trinity doctrine was not envisioned until several thousand years later(and in English, sentences have one subject, not three).
2) Acts (let alone any church in Acts) "never existed" for thousands of years either. Try again.


If someone were teaching a class on cooking, would you hijack THAT into your Trinity screed also?


Worldwide Flood Of Noah
  
Lawrence:

I said: Considering how the range of Noah's flood has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with Trinity doctrine, yes, you have hijackacked this blog into a totally unrelated post.

You said: Similarity wise, it Is.
Even with Judas, one of the twelve.


Please, enlighten us, as to HOW these subjects (let alone Judas) have anything to do with one another. I don't see it and I doubt anyone else does either.


Trav:

You said: My goodness, so XY humiliating!

Don't worry - I've also gotten similar egg on my face on occasion :)


Worldwide Flood Of Noah
  
Lawrence:

You said: Me Hijack ?

Considering how the range of Noah's flood has NOTHING WHATSOEVER to do with Trinity doctrine, yes, you have hijackacked this blog into a totally unrelated post.


Trav:

You said: See that you forgot capitalize the beginning of your sentence complaining of the missing "and" in mine.

You forgot "TO capitalize". Making grammar errors while accusing someone else of bad grammar - well, you do the math.


Worldwide Flood Of Noah
  
Lawrence:

You said: It's Not bashing or making fun. I Don't do such because it's serious Spiritual business.

You definitely imagine it so, because you think it's more important than any other Christian issue, seeing as how you hijack almost every single blog you post on into this contentious subject. But you don't really think about it, seeing how that screed has so many grammar errors (e.g. incomplete sentences), but rather than state your point articulately, you keep pasting the same error-filled prose into blog after blog ad nauseam.


Nation Of Israel
  
Nicole_Lacey:

You said: Tell me the names of non Catholics Leaders that helped the Jews instead of being silent.

Perhaps you have never heard of Lutheran minister Dietrich Bonhoeffer, who was hanged because he dared criticize the Nazi persecution of the Jews? Hiding Jews in your attic is one thing, but dying for them is an even greater sacrifice.


Relationship With Your Kids
  
Trav:

I said: Politicians commonly declare their opinions ....just to curry favor of voters.
You said: Curried you guys favors is correct.

Just who is "you guys"? By excluding yourself, are you implying that I am a voter and you are not? Because politicians (like advertisers) ply everybody, and don't particularly care whether their message reaches people who listen to their message or no, figuring that enough will to make a difference.

It's a perverse defense you maintain.

What is perverse? Be specific. I commented about presidential power had any legal relationship to the legality of abortion), not whether abortion is right. That is a different topic. Read up on logical fallacies.


Bracelet To Ward Off Evil
  
Steveng:

You said: So, does that mean that christians today are weak that they depend upon plants and man's medicines instead of God? Jesus said "ask and it shall be given," and it's written that christians can do greater miracles than Jesus.

By the same reasoning, are we so weak that we eat fish and rice and other produce that the earth produces, rather than praying for God to send a roast duck flying into our mouths (see previous post)? Yet Jesus never told us to abandon earthly toil and earthly gifts. Paul said "He who will not work, should not eat" NOT "He who will no do miracles should not eat".


Worldwide Flood Of Noah
  
Lawrence:

I see you have brought your repetitious trinity-bashing screed into yet another totally unrelated blog topic.


Relationship With Your Kids
  
Trav:

You said: Your fight is lost with scripture not me.

Yet scripture has examples of female leadership, as I mentioned.

Peter said: abortions are not a presidential matter.

You said: Are you from this country? Candidates stated their platform positions, for or against.

Legalized abortion in the U.S.A. was instituted by the Supreme Court, in their decision on Roe vs. Wade. Short of a constititutional amendment on the issue (and good luck with that), presidents have absolutely nothing to do with it.

Politicians commonly declare their opinions on subjects they have no power to control, or pass laws they know are unconstitutional and will be overturned, just to curry favor of voters.


Love Thy Neighbor
  
Nicole_Lacey:

When I first read the post in question, I got a good laugh out of it. But I also saw that you spelled the word correctly in a post on another blog, so it was clear that this was just a typo (probably made multiple times by some kind of automatic process), rather than unfamiliarity with spelling.

I don't know about posting using Google. I use Firefox, which underlines invalid words, but is no help when you type a word that is legitimate, but not the one you want.


Bracelet To Ward Off Evil
  
Steveng:

You wrote: While man has always used earthly plants (Ezekiel 47:12) and things to heal is it depending more upon the created than the creator to get healed?

There is an old Chinese proverb: Man wait long time with open mouth, waiting for roast duck to fly in.

If we're hungry, we can pray to God to fly a roast duck into our mouths - or we can go and fix a sandwich (which is much more likely to work). God put all kinds of plants and animals and minerals and other things in this world for us to use to our advantage. It would be foolish to reject them all, settling for nothing less than divine intervention for every single thing we do.


Relationship With Your Kids
  
Trav:

You said: Judge? Condemn? Only GOD does that. I rebuke his unscriptural man-stand by his own post.

So what, exactly, does this mean? Does God condemn female leadership? How about the Queen of Sheba, or Priscilla? or Esther?

Isa 3:9.

I fail to see how this has anything to do with female leadership, which is the point under contention.

Meanwhile, yet another blog thread hijacked into an endless "i am right in judging you on the flimsiest of evidence" argument. Are you capable of reasoned discussion on any subject, without constantly changing the subject into mostly unsubstantiated personal attacks?


Bracelet To Ward Off Evil
  
learner2:

You said: You might know that it is also wrong to wear wedding rings since they are rooted in paganism too.

By that reasoning, wearing a crucifix is also a sin, because crucifixion was a pagan Roman practice.


Relationship With Your Kids
  
Trav:

Cluny said: I have no personal objections to a woman president...

This does not, in any way, imply favoritism towards Hillary Clinton. Remember Sarah Palin? If you voted Republican, you voted for her as vice-president.

I voted for the Democratic candidate,(obama) even though I'm strongly pro-life,....

That was only in the primary, where he chose Obama over Hillary (as the lesser of two evils). But you are so quick to judge and condemn based on one single line of text, much like those who create doctrine by cherry picking scriptures, rather than investigating their larger context.



Copyright© 1996-2015 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.