ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Angels Taking Women For Wifes

Gen.6:2 has been interpreted as Angels who cohabitated with humans to bring forth offsprings. Can angels for that matter take women for wives and cause the birth of children?

Join Our Christian Singles and Take The Angels Bible Quiz
 ---Pek on 4/14/05
     Helpful Blog Vote (25)

Post a New Blog

Angels/demons do not have human bodies, therefore they must have possessed human bodies. Perhaps these demon-possessed beings proceeded to take women for the purpose of selective breeding, hence Nephelim or what we have come to know as Neanderthal. Through genome sequencing, it is now known that Neanderthal were larger brained (smarter), larger boned, very strong, and cannabalistic, also most of us, if not all have "neanderthal" dna... Bloodshed, violence over the face of the earth by smarter, wicked, stronger, cannabalistic and larger hybrid humans that abruptly disappeared fits the scriptures.
---Elizabeth on 6/12/10

While Gods' Angels are represented as males in the Bible, that does not mean that they have the equipment, less the genetic material, needed in order to produce children. The Bible neither mentions another angelic rebellion against God other than the one led by Satan and a third of the Angels. Nor does it say that these fallen angels are corporeal.
p.s. There are no angel marriages producing angel babies despite what some old fables may say. 1Timothy 1:4, 4:7, Titus 1:14.
---Glenn on 12/11/09

Genesis ch.1 repeats the phrase "after his kind" 10 times (there are also 10 commandments and 10 plagues on Egypt,for example).By an unnatural mixing of "kind" the stage was set for the flood.These "giants" were the product of an unnatural mixing between "sons of God and daughters of men"...maybe hybrids so to speak..some believe a return to this sort of depravity will re-occur in the tribulation..but I'm still not sure what to think about the idea myself ???
---richard on 12/8/09

They sere not angels, but sons of God.
---Eloy on 12/8/09

Gen 6:4 There were giants in the earth in those days, and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.

In continuation to Gen 6:2, Sons of God means people who are SAVE, on the other hand Daughters of Men referring to UNSAVE PEOPLE. Its like a Jew married to Gentile =Samaritans. A believer married unbeliever. This is why believer should not equal themselves with unbelievers. Men of renown/Giants referring not to physical height but spiritual giants who are Unsaved. Ex. great religious leaders of Today.
---ROSALIE on 12/7/09

Angels never identified as sons of God!
In fact,apostle that wrote Hebrews1 asks "where at any time does God ever say to an angel, "thou art my son" or say to an angel "I will be a father to you and you will be my son". Traditional teaching should bow out and let apostles' words be searched out/found true.

Job38: Job was FOREORDAINED to be identified as one of God's STARS. At creation's foundation, before Job's birth, God had pre-planned Job to SING/SHINE in the dark situation he was CURRENTLY in by IDENTIFYING HIMSELF AS A SON OF GOD/shouting for joy as SONS do instead of moaning/groaning like a darkened heathen ORPHAN.
The word ANGEL NOTin Job1/Job38! Only in translations/sermons/blogs from human error.
---Legends on 12/7/09

It's no sin for men to marry a wife. It is a sin for men to take wive(s).
Sin was obvious in Cain's rage. It later manifested in Lamech.

"Lamech married two women. Wive(s) of Lamech,I have killed a man for wounding me,If Cain is avenged seven times,Lamech seventy-seven.
(Then)ADAM lay with his "wife" again, begot Seth. Gen4:19,23-25

GenCh6: God's People unrestrained just like Cains' displaying that all sin comes thru ADAM not Cain.
God's obvious/even-handed judgement on ALL flesh started after His own HUMAN sons of God,ADAM's lineage thru Seth, sowed the seed of Hedonism. Then reaped the Harvest of Unrestrained ENLARGED BODIED CHILDREN aka GIANTS!
---Legends on 12/2/09

The Sons of God are, as follows, Angels (Job 38:7), Adam (Luke 3:38), Believers (Rom. 8:14, 2 Cor. 6:18, and preeminently to Christ, signifying his divine origin and nature (Dan. 3:13, Matt. 10:27, 26:16,John 1:18, 5:19-26, 9:35). That rules out Jesus (for obvious reasons), and man (commanded to be fruitful and multiply, so it would not be a sin for man to take wives). So that just leaves the fallen angels as the suspects. On the case that they possessed the humans and "cohabitated with humans," In the Genisis story, it does not state that they possessed the humans, they just saw the women and took them as wives.

(I dont really know about the possessions, but that is my conclusion for now, I thought that I read it)
---joel on 12/1/09

This topic is a perfect example of what happens when you always believe what the pastor says over studying the scriptures.

I was taught since I was a kid that the sons of God were the children of Seth. But there no scriptural basis for that. The Bible does seem to support them being angels however. Strange that immediately after that bonding between the sons of God and daughters of men, God wipes out the entire population of earth except for Noahs family.

Noah family was perfect (without spot) in their generations. Translate Gen 6:9 Youll find some interesting things.
---JackB on 11/30/09

Genesis 6:4, Numbers 13:33. Nephilim were cruel and oppressive men. Some people believe that the Septuagint makes reference to them being physically large. There are others that incorrectly believe that the sons of God were Angels (only in Job 1:6, 2:1, 38:7, sons of God refers to Angels) , but here they are Sethites. The two lines of men mentioned are through Cain, Genesis 4:17 and Seth, 5:6. 6:2,4 says that the sons (human) of God had children with the (ungodly) daughters of men. It wasn't proper for the men to do so, (1Corinthians 7:15, 2Corinthians 6:14-18). In Numbers most commentators would say that they are both tyrants and very tall. Angels cant reproduce, Matthew 22:30, Colossians 2:18, 2Timothy 2:23.
---Glenn on 11/27/09

WOW, some of the responses here are pretty far fetched.

Angels are are incorporeal beings, and cannot be affected with fleshly lusts, or marry, or procreate children etc.

Sons of God: this is to be understood of the posterity of Seth, who from the times of Enos, men began to call upon the name of the Lord, Ge 4:25. Religious men were said to be the sons of God.

Daughters of men: this is to be understood as the daughters of men who did not call upon the name of the Lord. These women though beautiful did not come from families that worshiped God.

These unions resulted in mankind drifting away from God. (Similar to what happened with King Solomon.)
---trey on 11/25/09

That was then and not now.God would not let that happen again.
---Robin on 11/25/09

Tartarus is a separate hell where those angels that took on human wives were bound in chains and sent there. If they were to mean regular hell, they most likely would have used the word Sheol.

What would make a union of a sinful person and a righteous person produce giants? If that were true, we'd see it today. We'd have giants all over the place.

It clearly states in 2 Peter 2:4,5 that they were indeed angels.

"2:4- For if God did not spare sinning angels, but delivered them to chains of darkness, thrust down into Tartarus, having been kept to judgment, 2:5- and did not spare the ancient world, but preserved Noah the eighth, a herald of righteousness, bringing a flood on a world of ungodly ones,".
---David on 11/25/09

The Hebrew word that is used for "the sons of God" is " & #1489, & #1504, & #1497, & #1492, & #1488, & #1500, & #1492, & #1497, & #1501,"
which is also found in Job 38:7, where God is asking Job where he was during the creation of the world and universe, and mentions the angels as the "morning stars sang together, and all the sons of God shouted for joy..."
---David on 11/25/09

Yes, Alan. I realized that you were being earnest and merely asking a question. The funny thing about it was the shock I got. It just proves something. We are only taught a fraction of the truth and when someone says something out of the blue that had never occurred to you in your wildest dreams, and never would apart from you glimpsing someone's question to someone else, there is something extremely funny about it. I do not mean to offend anyone. It explains why Noah is always portrayed as white haired and beared. Before the flood people did nt age so much so why should he be white haired? It just makes you think. Thanks Alan, and to Eloia, who really made me sit up and notice the question.
---frances008 on 2/23/09

Once I was in a job and someone gave me the best compliment I ever heard and that was 'You are a breath of fresh air'. Sometimes we need new ideas coming in to keep us from going like fetid water, stinking and full of unhealthy invisible poisons.
---frances008 on 2/23/09

Read These Insightful Articles About Software

I don't mean to offend Alan at all. In fact it confirms to me (his question) that he is not in on the conspiracy, but is just like a rather nice but not that clever policeman who stumbles upon an incredible crime being committed and tells the criminals off for double parking or something. Do you get the point? Isn't it stranger that we never were told this seemingly insignificant fact before? Isn't it odd that no Bible mentions this story. How much more of the Bible has been ommitted so that we sheeple do not know too much????
---frances008 on 2/23/09

Frances ... It is not my suggestion tht Noah was an albino. I was responding to Eloia, who said:

"When Noah was born, his father was afraid that he could .be an offspring from an angel because he was an albino"
---alan8566_of_UK on 2/23/09

Frances: It's not a matter of what you "think". What's vitally important is what the Bible says. Frankly, the Bible doesn't say what you say. For example, you say, "It was God's will not theirs...". Then you say, "That is why the decision was made [in other words, God decided] to destroy all of human kind...". So, God decided to transform "fallen/bad angels" into human beings, but later He realized He'd made a really big mistake & therefore had to destroy all of humanity because of it? Pleeeze, you can't be serious! Whether you're Christian or not, I don't know. But, "I think" you're just playing (amusing yourself) with the blog reactions you get from your numerous posted fantasies.
---Leon on 2/22/09

ROFL!!! AlanofUk. Haha haha. I am just killing myself laughing at your question below about Noah being albino. I could not make it up, the laughs I get on this website. But like all new ideas, I will probably research this and find out it is perfectly true. Not that you are claiming so, but someone must be.

Meantime, I believe that angels are only male. That they did indeed fall from Heaven and bred with woman human beings and we ended up with giants whose skeletons have been discovered but sometimes desposed of. They had double rows of teeth incidentally. Like the book of Enoch was also disposed of but not entirely, which talks of giants. All the evidence destroyed. However legends and physical monuments prove it is likely.
---frances008 on 2/18/09

Read These Insightful Articles About Advertising

Leon, I don't think good angels have any intention to do what they want. They are better than us humans and they just obey God. But some of them (bad angels) decided they wanted to follow Satan and rebel against God, putting Satan in God's place. Those angels were cast out of Heaven onto earth and took human form. It was God's will not theirs. Obviously they were magnificent creatures and the human women went with them and produced giant children. That is why the decision was made to destroy all human kind except Noah and his family. The genetics had been messed up with by Satan.
---frances008 on 2/18/09

If you're still here Pek, the answer to your question is NO!

Duane: "'Angels' have two sexes,"?

1. Where specifically in Zechariah does it say that?

2.How do you conclude angels can "at will" create and inhabit physical bodies & procreate with mankind (women)? Don't you know angels, like humans, are God-created beings & as such have no ability outside of God's will to make & inhabit physical bodies?

3. Where in Scripture does it say the union of angels & women produced a hybrid race of beings called giants?

4.Is what you say really fact or is it deeply rooted in fantasy? :)
---Leon on 2/18/09

If you're still here Pek, the answer to your question is NO!

Duane: "'Angels' have two sexes,"?

1. Where specifically in Zechariah does it say that?

2.How do you conclude angels can "at will" create and inhabit physical bodies & procreate with mankind (women)? Don't you know angels, like humans, are God-created beings & as such have no ability outside of God's will to make & inhabit physical bodies?

3. Where in Scripture does it say the union of angels & women produced a hybrid race of beings called giants?

4.Is what you say really fact or is it deeply rooted in fantasy? :)
---Leon on 2/18/09

It is my belief that "Angels" have two sexes, which is supported by scripture in Zechariah. I also believe that angels took wives and produced the giants we read about in scripture. The angels spoken of in genesis were fallen angels who put off their spiritual bodies and took on physical bodies, this is supported by the fact that even after the flood giants continued to appear after the flood, when all unrighteaous men were destroyed AKA Goliath and his brothers. Knowing the curse and promise of God it was Satan's intent to muddy the gene pool of the coming of Christ.
---duane on 2/18/09

Send a Free Father's Day Ecard

Nick: How do you conclude Noah's wife was a descendant of Cain? Bible chapter(s) and verse(s) please.
---Leon on 2/18/09

Interesting. I have a quick question. If you read carefully, wasn't Noah's wife a descended of Cain? So if we say that the sons of God were the family line of Seth, then wouldn't have Noah sinned against God, however, it says that Noah was a rightous man. I always found that odd. Maybe there is something to this whole angels having children. I'm sure that was not allowed and made God angry. They were suppose to be our watchers, not our lovers. One other little fact, in the book of Job, angels are called sons of God. This time era came right after the flood. So, couldn't you say that "sons of God" was a term used for angels during that time period? Maybe some one could enlighten
---Nick on 2/16/09

Since DNA evidence concludes that Neanderthals were not related to Cromagnons then is it possible Cromagnon were a different species from us...perhaps they were fallen angels? And there is debate as to whether they took human wives (and husbands?) from the time of Adam to Noah.
---David on 11/8/08

SILLY HUMANS! You know that the angels are looking down at us argue on their sexual orientation! OH HOW STUPID HUMANS REALLY ARE!!!
---chris on 6/22/07

Read These Insightful Articles About Eating Disorders

angles are messengers. there are many types of angels. To say they are all like Ken and Barbie, all smooth is missing the point. They did manage to bare children, the Nephilum.
---MikeM on 6/4/07

Bro. Matthew, I have to disagree with you on this one. Angels are not asexual. There are male angels and some female ones. I think you're referring to the fact that JESUS (YAHUSHUA) reminded the religious leaders of His day that the Saints will be as the angels in Heaven in that they will not marry. Many angels are quite masculine and reportedly so beautiful that you'd be tempted to worship them.
---Gordon on 6/4/07

*Angels are asexual. They are neither male or female. Godly men were taking worldly women to cohabitate with. They were producing ungodly off spring.*

Zechariah 5:9
Then lifted I up mine eyes, and looked, and, behold, there came out two women, and the wind was in their wings; for they had wings like the wings of a stork: and they lifted up the ephah between the earth and the heaven
---Matthew on 6/4/07

Who said that the "sons of God" were angels? Search for this prase throughout the scriptures and you will find that we are also the sons and daughters of God. More likely these are the believers of God who took unbelievers to wife and became unbelievers. Only Noah remained true and was saved with his family on the ark.
---lorra8574 on 6/3/07

Read These Insightful Articles About Travel Packages

Of interest, it is also possible that the giants of this era were another species. Homo sapiens co-existed with both Neanderthals and the later Cro-Magnon man. Cro-Magnon man might well be described as a "giant", not necessarily for height, but perhaps for having a more robust build. Since these beings are recorded in our archeology, it makes sense that the Bible would also have record of them. And if the two species mated, the offspring might exhibit many unusual traits.
---lorra8574 on 6/3/07

Part 2: I would point out that what I have written about Cro-Magnon man does not conflict with scripture, nor does it confirm Evolution. We did not descend from Cro-Magnon man nor Neanderthals, but the Bible does record giants as if they were of a different species or breed of human.
---lorra8574 on 6/3/07

Actually i would say angels dont multiply...but it doesnt really matter
---mark_B. on 6/2/07

Angels are asexual. They are neither male or female. Godly men were taking worldly women to cohabitate with. They were producing ungodly off spring.
---Tsuanne on 6/2/07

Read These Insightful Articles About Credit Repair

Personally, IMHO, I think not..I think the sons of God means those who followed God's teachings, and the daughters of man are women who were not believers..we are taught that the angels do not marry.
---Ann5758 on 5/28/07

Angels do not marry or bring forth offspring.
---Kay6588 on 2/7/07

Nancy the angels are God's messengers. That is all. Gabriel is/was one of those messengers.
You will notice in Matthew, in the account of the birth of Jesus on this earth, it is The Angel of the Lord that makes the announcement. Normally when we see words like this it is speaking of the Lord Himself.
Angels cannot reproduce and didn't have part in the siring of Jesus in any form whatsoever.
In Luke Gabriel made the announcement to Joseph about the birth that is all.
---Elder on 2/6/07

Miguel, you have posted one of the best responces/answers I have seen.
God Bless.
---Elder on 2/6/07

Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Products

Soda_Pop, Those men who were the product of angel and human were from [Noah's Generation] and died in the Great Flood, only 8 souls survived the Great Flood, so they didn't have any descendants [after] the Great Flood, thus Goliath didn't come from them. God Bless!
---Mrs._Morgan on 2/6/07

Did Goliath have a glandular disorder, pituitary disease? He was 10 feet tall.
---Soda_Pop on 2/6/07

Whoops, Goliath may have been 13 ft tall.

Was Goliath a Nephilim from Gen 6:4?
---Soda_Pop on 2/6/07

Daniel, Bruce, Bulldog, Bullfrog, do you know where Goliath came from and why he was still alive?
---Soda_Pop on 2/5/07

Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Divorce

If Giants means angels, then minute must be mouse. We truly confuse God's simple truth. God by the KJV people.
---Lynna on 2/4/07

Where did Goliath come from, and why was he alive during David's lifetime?

Why didn't the flood wipe his lineage out?
---Sela on 2/4/07

"Can angels for that matter take women for wives and cause the birth of children?" I must say that the Angel Gabriel arranged with the Holy Ghost for the birth of Jesus. If he was not directly then he was indirectly involved in the birth of a human being/God into the world.
---Nancy on 12/1/05

According to everything I've read, Angels are "sexless". They can't reproduce nor have sex. The angels noted in Gen 6:2 may be referring to the children of Able and/or Seth.
---WIVV on 11/30/05

Read These Insightful Articles About Christian Marriage

Of angels having children, Genesis 6:2, I think that man is created in the image of God, thus "sons of God", and woman is created in the image of man, thus "daughters of men". Man is the glory of God. Woman is the glory of man. (1 Corinthians 11:7-12) I think many things are spiritually understood. (Matthew 23:15, John 8:44, 1 Peter 3:6) There are many N.T. verses about the sons of God. John 10:34 Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your Law, 'I have said you are gods'?"
---miguel on 5/3/05

Eloia ... where does it say in the Bible that Noah was an albino?

---Alan_of_U.K. on 5/3/05

DOUBTFUL. Have you not read the new testament when the saducees who do not believe in the resurrection tested Jesus about who would be married to a woman at the resurrection after she had seven husbands? Jesus answered that in heaven there are no marriages, that we will be like the angels. There is neither male nor female in heaven. We will be like the angels. SEXLESS beings. But of spirit beings, read 1 Corinthians 6:16-17.
---miguel on 5/2/05

Now the second part of your question. Do the research if you really want to know the truth. Ask God. Pray. He still answers. Look at arqueology, history, and mythology. Where do you think pagan religions got their ideas,practices,and their gods from? It is very interesting.
---Eloia8896 on 5/2/05

Read These Insightful Articles About Debt Consolidation an offspring from an angel because he was an albino; and seemed like a special child, that he went to see Enoch who lived isolated in the mountains. But Enoch put him at ease and made a prophetic statement concerning the role that Noah would play in God's plan. All through the bible we have lots of examples of angels taking human form, eating and bringing messages; they looked similiar to us because we are told that many have been visited by angels and remained unaware(Hebrews 13:2)Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so doing some people have entertained angels without knowing
---Eloia8896 on 5/2/05

Job 1:6)One day the angels came to present themselves before the Lord, and Satan also came with them(NIV) Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the Lord and Satan came also among them(KJV) The ones in Gen.6:2 were also angelic beings and the ancient viewpoint was that the angels in Jude 1:6,7 are those angels. If you futhur your research and read the book of Enoch, of whom even Jesus makes reference to and quotes verbatim lots of verses from the book, served as go between those beings and God. When Noah was born, his father was afraid that he could ..
---Eloia8896 on 5/2/05

if you want to understand just how many DIFFERENT meanings the word "hell" has, simply sit down with a Strong's Concordance and a Vine's Dictionary.
---gabriel on 5/1/05

Cliff: God bless! See you around the blog. :-)
---Leon on 4/28/05

Read These Insightful Articles About Refinancing

Leon; My point....There's more than one place called "hell" (of Germanic origin hoel meaning to bury) Would you be good enough to show me the scripture that says "seperation from God is hell?"
---1st_cliff on 4/26/05

Cliff: The main subject is "Angels Taking Women for Wives". The plain truth is separation from God, for all of eternity, is "Hell" no matter how dark or bright or whatever name is given to the place/condition.

What's your point?
---Leon on 4/26/05

Leon; You dont see where I'm going with this .Tarterus is a place of "dense darkness" therefor different than your view of hell.How dense dark is it with a fire burning?
---1st_cliff on 4/25/05

Oh-h-h -- Tartaros (the abyss of Hades)! Why not just make it main & plain...simply say "Hell" Cliff? :-)

What makes you believe that angels have creative powers? I see where you're going with this, i.e., if they can create then they can certainly procreate. Ol' bud, I don't mean any harm; but, I believe you're trying to square peg a round hole, i.e., eisege(ses) the Bible. Again, the Bible teaches God alone creates. The devil & his demons/fallen angels, at best, imitate by way of possessing lost humanity.
---Leon on 4/24/05

Read These Insightful Articles About Franchises

After stating that humans in the resurrection neither marry nor are given in marriage, Jesus says that humans are "as the angels of God" Matthew 22:30, Mark 12:25,and in Luke 20:36 says they are "equal unto the angels." No scripture I know of reveals any woman who was taken by an angel to wife and had a child. Angels here used referring to heavenly messengers, ministering spirits. The word translated angel is also used referring to person sent with a message--messenger(s. 2 Samuel 11:22-25, 1 Kings 19:2, Genesis 32: 3 & 6. etc.
---Wayne on 4/23/05

Leon; Your answer is 1pet.2.4.You will need an ehaustive concordence to see that the word here translated "hell" here ,is tarterus in Greek!
---1st_cliff on 4/23/05

Here let me finish my last post:Remember we can't say what Angels are, if we can't see or examine one. There are many things we don't know about them. I believe that this is where we get Giants and the basis of all these myths. I'll have to wait and see if I'm right.
---Nicholas on 4/22/05

I would respectfully disagree with most of you on the basis of ignorance. I'm not saying anyone here is stupid, what I'm saying is that we are lacking in concrete proof one way or the another. I personally believe that real angels did marry men. What is neglected by a lot of people in these verses is it says that would marry and be given in marriage. If you read it carefully it talking about Polygamy not marriage. The majority of Scripture refers to Angels as "Sons of God".
---Nicholas on 4/22/05

Read These Insightful Articles About Lead Generation

Leon; sorry to be so long getting back to you, 2Pet 2.4 is another example where "hell" is translated from "tarterus"(3 Greek and one Hebrew words are translated by the English word hell) a place of dense darkness. How "dark" would it be with flames burning? Why do you say angels can't materialize on their own? Do you know what powers they have?
---1st_cliff on 4/21/05

Cliff: Angels do not create bodies & then materialize themselves in them at will. The ones at Sodom...were sent by God to enforce His will. God enabled them to be seen in human form.

Where in the Bible (book, chapter & verse(s) please) is there mention of this place you call Tararus?

Genesis 6:5-7; 11-13 explains why God brought the floods. It had to do with the wickedness of man -- had nothing to do with angels.
---Leon on 4/16/05

Before the flood, everybody was a giant (see archaeological evidence by Dr. Carl Baugh and Ron Wyatt). Some still were after the flood for a while, but most of us are sin-degenerated runts of half the race's original size. As far as who the sons of God are; But as many as received him, to THEM gave he power to become the sons of God. (John 1:12)
---Jerry on 4/16/05

Genesis6:1-4 (4)There were giants in the earth in those days;-also after that when (2&4)the Sons of God-righteous took wives of daughters of men-unrighteous(reference 2Corinthians6:18) and had children by them.There were also giants after the flood, David killed one.Angels didn't breed with humans,the fallen angels are reserved in chains of darkness until judgement day.Angels may be able to take human form,but it doesn't mean spirits would have flesh with blood and sperm to form babies.
---Darlene_1 on 4/15/05

Read These Insightful Articles About Mortgages

Leon;It's chap.2 beginning vs4. If angels cannot "materialize" a human body,how did the people of Sodom and Gommora see them,and wanted to have sex with them? The Nephelim were indeed the hybrid sons of this unholy match.Why do you think God brought the flood? They drowned and the angels were thrown into "Tararus."
---1st_cliff on 4/15/05

that verse does not mean angels, but rather other people that God created, i think.
---curt on 4/15/05

Fallen angels (demons) are disembodied SPIRIT CREATURES and CAN NOT make (CREATE) human bodies for themselves to inhabit. Only God creates. They however can and do frequently possess (take control over) the bodies of unsaved persons, e.g., Luke 7:21; 8:2, 8:26-39. A possessed human who cohabits with another human can "at best" produce baby humans, not some kind of hybrid angel-human being.

Cliff ol' buddy: "1st Pt. 3" what verse(s)?
---Leon on 4/15/05

1st Pet.3 says Angels sinned in Noah's day. Bible says Angels (in heaven) dont marry, but if they "materialize a human body on earth, what's to prevent them?
---1st_cliff on 4/15/05

Read These Insightful Articles About Personal Loans

That's a wrong interpretation, the Scripture does not read "angels", but instead they were "sons of God". "Then the sons of God saw the daughters of men, that they were fair, and took to them wives which they best liked among them all. There were giants in the world in those days: for after that the sons of God had gone to the daughters of men, and had born to them, the same were the mightiest of the world and men well-known." Genesis 6:2,4.
---Eloy on 4/15/05

The scripture in genesis is referring to christians marrying non christians. angels do have a gender.
---shira_5965 on 4/14/05

I looked up sons of God in my bible dictionary and it says that these were the descendants of Seth. If you would read verse 4 it talks about giants. From my understanding when an angel got a woman pregnant she brought forth a giant, mighty men. If you would look up Nephilim, Anakim, Emims, Goliath, Isbi-Benob, Og, Rephaim, Zamzummim. theses are the names of the giants from the bible. I got my info from my Bible collection CD.
---Rebecca_D on 4/14/05

Copyright© 2017 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.