ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

Shaming The Men

Have you notice that we are shaming men for being a man?

Plus, families are made fun of if they have more than 3 children. Why?
If a woman wants to stay home and a man work it's okay.
Can we mind our own business?

Join Our Free Singles and Take The Relationships Quiz
 ---Nicole_Lacey on 3/12/18
     Helpful Blog Vote (6)

Reply to this BlogPost a New Blog

Jerry, hear about the FIRST transgender man identifying himself as a woman requested to go to a woman's prison?

The Federal Gov BELIEVED him.


'Transgender prisoner who sexually assaulted inmates jailed for life' -The Guardian

Ms. Karen White (Formerly known as Stephen Terence Wood) was a test to PROVE you and I wrong.

But at least an apologize was giving to the women.

A Prison Service spokesperson said: We apologise sincerely for the mistakes which were made in this case.

While we work to manage all prisoners, including those who are transgender, sensitively and in line with the law, we are clear that the safety of all prisoners must be our absolute priority.

---Nicole_Lacey on 2/1/19


I already agreed to get back to the topic, but you don't seem to be willing to do so, as you keep flogging the dead horse.
---StrongAxe on 3/27/18

AXE. So criticizing you for your constant attempts to derail this blog topic is somehow "wasting blog space"...LOL.
Are you joking, or do you think that is a valid point?

We all make silly mistakes AXE, so I suggest you just realize your mistake and stop trying to derail blog topics instead of attacking me for confronting you about your mistake.

BTW, Marxism is very relevant in many social issues simply because the Marxist Left are the cause behind most of it.

This blog topic is about the attack against family and men, which coincidentally fits the known Marxist goal of discrediting the family as an institution.
---Haz27 on 3/27/18


YOU were the first to bring up Marxism. You've been constantly wasting the blog topic space attacking me, rather than speaking to the blog topic, so for you to constantly accuse me of doing so is the pot calling the kettle black. So let's just mutually agree to drop it (if you're able), and let's get back to the topic, OK?
---StrongAxe on 3/27/18

I still can't get through. I have been trying to encourage you all to watch the documentary "Agenda". It is well worth it.

---jerry6593 on 3/27/18

AXE. Yet again you deflect, obfuscate and feign victim hood simply to derail from topic.

You offer lame excuses for your position, but the fact remains your arguments are consistent with the propaganda of the Marxist Left and this fact cannot be avoided. And like I said, this shows who controls you.

This blog topic, which you constantly seek to derail, is about the attack against family and men.

And one of the goals the FBI found from Communists and listed in the book titled "The Naked Communist" was:
Discredit the family as an institution

Considering your arguments so often support the Communists aims, and your efforts here to derail this blog topic, it's clear what you're up to.

---Haz27 on 3/26/18


What tactics? What deflection? All I'm asking is that you SUBSTANTIATE all your accusations against me, yet instead of doing so, you keep accusing me over and over again.

I find that accusation of Marxism as offensive as Jewish people find being called Nazis.

The cake issue was about anti-discrimination in general.

My VERY FIRST post on this blog was in response to YOUR deflecting this topic to your own religion, anti-Marxism.

"brainwashed useful idiot"

Matthew 5:22: ... but whosoever shall say, Thou fool, shall be in danger of hell fire.

But don't let someone as irrelevant as Jesus interrupt your constant raving about your Lord and Savior Bezmanov.
---StrongAxe on 3/26/18

AXE. I remind you I can see right through your tactics. You can deflect, obfuscate and falsely claim victim hood as much as you like, but it won't work.

Your consistent support for Marxist agendas says much what controls you:
Marxist agendas such as:
-Attacking 2nd Amendment.
-The Marxist LGBT agenda (remember how you argued in support of Left's stance against Christian bakers, etc if they refused their services to LGBT marriage).
-And now here on this very topic about the attack against family and men (a known Marxist goal) we again see you trying to deflect from this topic onto unrelated topics.

BTW, I see you as what Yuri Bezmanov (and Stalin) described as "brainwashed useful idiot" for the Marxist Left.
---Haz27 on 3/26/18


All I'm asking you is to to provide evidence of your accusations, which you never do. "truth is established by two or three witnesses" is BIBLE, not Marxist propaganda.

I have not mentioned anything LGBTQI, so what nether regions are you pulling that from?

Wanting tighter regulations is NOT "anti 2nd amendment". Also, just because I think something and Marxists think the same doesn't make me a Marxist. I'm sure you and Hillary agree 2+2=4. Does that make you a Democrat? Of course not.

My family is from Poland and suffered under Marxists and also under Nazis (who murdered some of them). I hate both with the heat of a thousand suns, so don't you DARE presume to call me one. Stop. Just STOP.
---StrongAxe on 3/26/18

I hope everyone has a sincere holy week.

God Bless. I will be praying for everyone on CN.

I hope you are praying for me.
---Nicole_Lacey on 3/25/18

AXE. You're still pushing your Marxist agenda. Yuri Bezmanov was so correct about the success of Marxist brainwashing.

In spite of the topic being about the PC attack against family and men, you (in spite of your past routine of criticizing others for even lessor divergence from topic, whenever its convenient for you), argue in support of Marxists LGBTQI agenda, you argue for the Marxists attack against 2nd Amendment, and here we see you trying to deflect attention away from the Marxists attack against family and men.

And like a typical Leftist you even use youths blinded by grief and/or emotional and political manipulation from the heartless opportunistic Left, to further a Marxist agenda.

---Haz27 on 3/25/18

Hi Jerry,

I have an sincere question.

How can the Moderate tell us the forbidden words if they are forbidden?

BTW, I don't think words bothers Moderators as much as clicks or bonds preventing postings

Ex: StrongAxe has a buddy that will not post some of my responses to him.

But if I wait and repost the SAME blog another Moderator will have it release .

Such is life.

No big deal
---Nicole_Lacey on 3/24/18


Exactly for that purpose if they are trying to become a dictatorship.

Haven't you been paying attention? The text of the Second Amendment SPECIFICALLY mentions "To form a well-regulated militia". NOWHERE does it mention dictatorship.

YES IT IS! You have a LACK of understanding of OUR RIGHTS!

The Second Amendment does not mention NUKES. It also does not mention GUNS. It says ARMS. BOTH guns and nukes are ARMS. Why should one be allowed and the other not? Why is one an inalienable right but the other isn't?

The students who survived getting shot at and are saying "we don't want to die" are getting DEATH THREATS for saying so.
---StrongAxe on 3/24/18

StrongAxe: Not for overthrowing corrupt governments.//

Exactly for that purpose if they are trying to become a dictatorship.

//Neither are machine guns.//

YES IT IS! You have a LACK of understanding of OUR RIGHTS!

Any kind of gun is STILL a gun.

Are you suggesting certain speeches are banned?

Political speeches are not allowed because the Founding Fathers didn't put the word 'political' in front of speech?

//Yet when the students exercise NO. 1, their lives are threatened by gun owners!//


They are the ones MARCHING trying to ban MY NO. 2.

I am at HOME minding my own business as they are use their No. 1

Why CAN'T we have BOTH?

---Nicole_Lacey on 3/24/18


You wrote: Did you think the Founding Fathers were stupid?

They specified in the 2nd amendment EXACTLY what it was for - to form well-regulated militias. Not for hunting. Not for overthrowing corrupt governments. Not for protecting your property. Not for shooting up your neighbors when you throw a temper tantrum.

The could just as easily have left the militia clause out, but they didn't. They put it in for a VERY SPECIFIC reason. Why was that, do you think?

Nukes ISN'T in the Constitution!

Neither are machine guns.

But my gun rights is NO. 2.

Yet when the students exercise NO. 1, their lives are threatened by gun owners!
---StrongAxe on 3/24/18

Axe: It would be nice if the Mod (robo- or otherwise) would apprise us of the "forbidden words" such that we don't waste our limited time writing something that won't be printed.

---jerry6593 on 3/24/18

Read These Insightful Articles About Accounting

StrongAxe: I quote what the constitution SAYS..., yet you choose to assume many things (e.g. self-protection) that are NOT anywhere in the 2nd amendment,//

WHAT is the purpose of a gun to you?

Did you think the Founding Fathers were stupid?

They NEVER used a gun before?

They just collect guns as a hobby?

GUNS are used to PROTECT oneself!
First of all from the Government in the Founding Father's mind.

//If the government has nukes, does that mean we're all entitled to nukes too?//

Nukes ISN'T in the Constitution!


Can we agree on those 3 things as NOT being in the BILL OF RIGHTS?

But my gun rights is NO. 2.
---Nicole_Lacey on 3/24/18


In addition to human moderators, I believe this site also employs robo-moderation. When you post a message, it is automatically scanned for certain "forbidden" words, and if it contains any of those, the message is silently deleted. Of course, we are never notified of this, nor of human moderator censorship, despite the fact that the site requires us to specify our email address with every message.
---StrongAxe on 3/23/18


---jerry6593 on 3/23/18

No man, confident of his own masculinity can be emasculated, or shamed. Any attempt to do so will be seen for what it is, humorous and unfounded, and certainly no cause for offense. Why, or rather how can a family of more than three children be made fun of? The question makes no sense to me. Minding our own business should be easy, if we prefer not to have others in ours.
---joseph on 3/23/18

Read These Insightful Articles About Fundraisers

MOD: Is there some reason why my last 3 blog entries have not been posted?

---jerry6593 on 3/22/18


YOU are the actually one who uses "Marxist" in almost every single post. The only time I use it is in calling you on what YOU actually say. Deflection? I have repeatedly asked how quoting the constitution is attacking it, yet you NEVER answer, but instead just keep attacking me.

Satan doesn't care HOW he accuses us, as long as he can render us powerless by doing so. He doesn't restrict himself to the Law.

Stop your dishonest victim narrative, and straw man arguments, etc. You're only digging yourself into an ever deeper hole if you continue.

YOU allude to my supporting terrorists, and when I call you on it, you call ME dishonest? Look in a mirror.
---StrongAxe on 3/21/18

AXE. Yet more deflection. You constantly push Marxist Left narrative, but then when confronted about the harm Leftists cause you then run for cover with deflections, etc.

You STILL take Rev 12:10 out of context. Satan is the accuser under the law, and he wants us all to judge righteousness by deeds of law.
But as I do not judge your righteousness by deeds of law, then how do you equate this non judgmental stance as somehow accusing you of being unrighteous based on deeds of the law?

Either you're clueless about the gospel, or else you're just up to your usual old straw man arguments.

Stop your dishonest victim narrative, and straw man arguments, etc. You're only digging yourself into an ever deeper hole if you continue.
---Haz27 on 3/21/18


No, JESUS is relevant in many debates. Your total obsession with Marxism clouds your judgment. They say, to a man with a hammer, all the world looks like a nail.

Yes, Satan is the accuser, so why do YOU constantly accuse ME in every post? Does this not suggest something wrong in your own house?


I quote what the constitution SAYS. If YOU only listened to it, YOU would agree with ME, yet you choose to assume many things (e.g. self-protection) that are NOT anywhere in the 2nd amendment, and accuse anyone who DOESN'T read between the lines of attacking it. I only attack what ISN'T THERE!

If the government has nukes, does that mean we're all entitled to nukes too?
---StrongAxe on 3/20/18

Send a Free Heavenly Angel Ecard

AXE. As I said before, I see right through your dishonest tactics, hence there'll be no trade off as you hope for. I'll continue making relevant arguments and wont trade them off for your offer to stop your dishonest accusations.

Marxism will ALWAYS be a relevant point in many debates about societal issues simply because the Marxist Left have caused so much division and damage to society.

Also the likes of KGB Communist defector Yuri Bezmanov, and academic and former Marxist David Horowitz, will remain relevant due to their many warnings about Marxism.

BTW, yet again you use scripture out of context. Satan is the accuser (Rev 12:10), and the context of this is in regards to judging righteousness by deeds of the law.
---Haz27 on 3/20/18

//Once again, how is quoting the EXACT TEXT of the constitution an attack?---StrongAxe on 3/20/18

Because if you ONLY quote the text you would agree with us.

You keep interpreting the EXACT text as you wish which is wrong.

If the Government as military style weapons the people are allowed to have military weapons to keep them in check.

Got it?
---Nicole_Lacey on 3/20/18


I'll stop when you stop your constant accusations, condemnations, and flagrantly dishonest innuendos.

You act as if Bezmanov is your savior, since you quote him in almost every post. You don't seem to care much about "thou shalt not bear false witness" Moses, nor "do unto others as you would do unto them" Jesus. Guess whom the Bible calls "the accuser"?

If Marxism is THAT important to you, PLEASE create a blog about that specific topic, instead of hijacking every other blog you are on for that topic. You're OBSESSED. I'm not deflecting. I'm asking you to STAY ON TOPIC.


Once again, how is quoting the EXACT TEXT of the constitution an attack?
---StrongAxe on 3/20/18

AXE. Please...stop with your inane victim narrative. That's so Left, and dishonest, considering your tactics here.

Marxism is extremely relevant to the problems societies face today, and no amount of denial, deflections and obfuscation from you can change that.

The attack against family, and men, has long been a Marxist goal, as listed in the 1958 book by an FBI agent titled "The Naked Communist".

But of course we all know that you'll just persist with your tactics of deflection, and pleading victimhood, etc.

Some things never change.
Yuri Bezmanov was so right about the Left's brainwashing.
---Haz27 on 3/20/18

Read These Insightful Articles About Ecommerce

StrongAxe: You presume to know more than many men here, so how is that attitude different from the commercials you complain about?//

Being SMART?

Having a bad day?

//As in the 2nd Amendment blog, you hijacked this into an anti-Marxist screed. You are OBSESSED with Marxism, bringing it up in every blog.//

Maybe if you would STOP using Marxist tactics to stop our RIGHTS she would stop bringing it up in every blog?

//I kept asking you HOW doing so was "attacking the constitution", but you kept avoiding that.---StrongAxe on 3/18/18

When you and others keep wanting to LIMIT our RIGHTS we will continue to state the obvious
---Nicole_Lacey on 3/19/18

Women and girls are made powerful. Men and boys powerless.
---Nicole_Lacey on 3/17/18

This has been happening for over 20 years now.

It started sometime in the late 80's early 90's when the Disney movie The Little Mermaid came out. I noticed it because my step-daughter asked about the seeming independence and rebellion of the main character. All worked out in the movie, but what the movie showed to my step-daughter was that it was okay to do what you want, regardless of what your father thinks.

I feel it caused my step-daughter to see herself as able to make decisions for herself without the need to consult anyone, including Our Father in Heaven. This lead her down a terrible path.
---Mark_Eaton on 3/19/18

Never noticed don't care. Men have been made fun of in shows and movies for ages. Daddy day care for one.

I had a single mom. I cleaned house made my bed and mowed the yard. Washed my clothes etc.

Got married when we both worked I did a fair share of house work. I still change the beds. My wife has problem with her back. Haven't had to wash clothes in 44 years. But just take the basket so the washer and take them to the bed when they are full. My wife says I don't fold clothes right. So she told me to just fold my own.

No problem.

Real men have no problem helping the people they love.
---Samuelbb7 on 3/18/18


You presume to know more than many men here, so how is that attitude different from the commercials you complain about?


As in the 2nd Amendment blog, you hijacked this into an anti-Marxist screed. You are OBSESSED with Marxism, bringing it up in every blog. If you want to start an Anti-Marxist or left-bashing blog here, feel free to do so. You can rant on it all you want.

You also made totally unfounded innuendos about me re: ANTIFA and SPLC. Ever heard "Thou shalt not bear false witness"? Just STOP.

That discussion was about the 2nd amendment, which I quoted VERBATIM. I kept asking you HOW doing so was "attacking the constitution", but you kept avoiding that.
---StrongAxe on 3/18/18

Read These Insightful Articles About Jewelry

Jerry and Haz I agree.

My brother pointed out something to me that I didn't realize.

Watch most (if not all) of the commercials on TV. They have men looking uninformed, helpless, clueless or plain dumb needing a women to guide them.

Or men doing all the cleaning/household duties (if both sexes are in the commercial) shopping etc.

Men have to ask women want to do/explain when buying insurance policies or cell phone plans because they are so clueless.

Women and girls are made powerful. Men and boys powerless.

In the class room girls are the ones who know the Teacher's answers not the boys. Only girls have their hands up raised ready to answer the questions.

It's amazing how cunning the Left behave.
---Nicole_Lacey on 3/17/18

As I said in another blog, the FBI listed what they found of the goals of the Communists in a 1958 book titled "The Naked Communist".

This would explain why the rabid Leftist FeminNazi's, etc demonize men (except of course if they're misogynistic Muslims), and belittle stay at home mums.

Their goals also included the capture of one or both political parties in US. The Marxists have clearly captured DEMs, and probably some of REPs too. Likewise in Australia, Marxists dominate most political parties here.

Another goal was to infiltrate and control news media, radio, Hollywood. Hence the Fake News CNN, NYT, WP, BBC, etc that we see today.
---Haz27 on 3/16/18

Hi Nicole:

Not likely that the PC Liberal crowd will ever mind their own business and leave us alone. I just ignore them, leaving them to wallow in their own ignorance. After all, how intelligent can someone be that doesn't understand that God made Males and Females and nothing else. Just laugh at them.

---jerry6593 on 3/15/18

Copyright© 2017 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.