ChristiaNet MallWorld's Largest Christian MallChristian BlogsFree Bible QuizzesFree Ecards and Free Greeting CardsLoans, Debt, Business and Insurance Articles

josef's Blog Replies
Post a New Blog

Vote on josef as a helpful ChristiaNet blogger by clicking this link. Currently josef has 114 votes. The higher the number of votes the more helpful this blogger is considered by the ChristiaNet community.


Canada Hate Bill For Speech
  
"What do you think about Canada putting through a bill criminalizing hate speech in public? Steveng what qualifies as "hate speech" according to their new bill?? How is it applied to "christian displays" or "street preaching"?


Jesus With Taxes
  
"JOSEF. It's disappointing that you disregard God's word. Haz this sounds like an accusation, that has brought you to a judgment concerning me:o) Does it suit you? Obviously you've decided to end our exchange. Be blessed in your thoughts, Have a good day.


Jesus With Taxes
  
My apologies Haz, I posted this response to the wrong blog. A man does not 'overcome' (conquer or defeat) that which he has been 'freed' (delivered or liberated) from. An accusation may be a part of the "judging process", however the accusation is not the judgment.


The Mueller Report Trump
  
Haz a man does not 'overcome' (conquer or defeat) that which he has been 'freed' (delivered or liberated) from. An accusation may be a part of the "judging process", however the accusation is not the judgment.


Jesus With Taxes
  
"JOSEF. Your indiscriminate generalizations about "accusations" appears to be a deliberate ploy to avoid the truth." What "truth" are you referring to Haz? Where in Rev 12:10,11 does it read, or even imply "Jesus freed us from Satan's accusations"? Freed and overcame are different words with different meanings. They are not synonyms. The same applies to the words accused and judged that you attempted to make synonyms earlier on 5/2 by quoting 1 Cor 5:3, in an apparent attempt to accuse Paul of making an accusation.


Jesus With Taxes
  
"As you're the one who first referred to Satan the accuser" No Haz, John of Revelation was first. Where is it written that Jesus set anyone free from Satan's accusations? Since you seem fond of suggestions, I "suggest" you stop looking to defend or excuse accusations of any kind.


Jesus With Taxes
  
"JOSEF. Not answering my question on what Satan the accuser was accusing people of is not helping you. HAZ, no help necessary. I am not interested in his accusations. If the subject of his accusations is important to you, then answer it yourself, If you have an answer, for the benefit of those who may think likewise. In my view, an accusation is an accusation, period, and unnecessary in the light of evidence. If there is no evidence, there should be no accusation. Baseless accusations has cost people their lives.


Jesus With Taxes
  
"I suggest you be more discerning about what is "accusing" in future.
---Haz27 on 5/1/19"
Haz I've stated the definition of accusing, as I understand the term. I suggest you adhere to your own suggestion, today.
"Also I guess you don't like the accusations against false Christians in 1Cor 5." Paul's rebuke is directed towards those in the church making or listening to the accusations, without taking any action concerning them. And no Haz, I don't like accusations, of any kind. I make every effort to avoid them, and allow evidence to speak for itself.


Jesus With Taxes
  
"We need to differentiate what accusations Satan is in to, as opposed to accusations of other matters such as false brethren in the church" (1Cor 5).---Haz27 on 4/30/19 Why Haz? And accusation is "a charge of wrongdoing, imputation of guilt or blame" regardless of "the act of accusing or state of being accused." Accusers, are off springs of the accuser. Prove me wrong.


Jesus With Taxes
  
"Mark 12 and Luke 23 backs me up and you all know it. You just making up stuff NOT in the Bible." Nicole that's exactly what an accusation sounds like. And that's exactly how Luke 23:2 reads, like an unfounded accusation. Satan is the accuser, and those influenced by him, and yield, are his servants.
"So, Josef, your explanation of Kingdom not on earth doesn't matter. Luke 23:2 (King)" I just thought I would throw it in anyway Nicole, It may matter to someone. I think "my kingdom is not of this world" means what it reads. Jesus never claimed to be king. We are simply privileged, blessed of Him, to know that He returns to earth as LORD OF LORDS and KING OF KINGS.


Jesus With Taxes
  
"You all are claiming Jesus paid Caesar when the Bible is clear that He didn't and refused when asked." Where Nichole? BCV?


Jesus With Taxes
  
Jesus asked Peter "of whom do the kings of the earth take custom or tribute? of their own children, or of strangers?" Peter answered "strangers", "Jesus saith unto him, then the children are exempt." Believers profess themselves to be "strangers and pilgrims on the earth." Therefore must pay by it's laws. As far as claiming to be king, When asked by Pilate, Art thou a king? Jesus simply said "Thou sayest that I am a king." Just prior to the question He had already stated "My kingdom is not of this world: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence."


Jesus With Taxes
  
"Those who believe Jesus was okay with paying taxes. Please explain these Passages Why try an explain a lie? The statement was a baseless accusation. Jesus' answer concerning taxes was, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's."


Stop Arresting Criminals
  
"Boston orders police to stop arresting criminals for breaking and entering, destruction of property or shoplifting. I don't know exactly what is meant by "stop arresting", are those things considered a crime or not. If so, there must be an arrest, indictment, and prosecution. Or it could be the city is simply looking to save money, and rather than bearing the cost, they are looking to make the citizen more 'protection minded' as concerning intrusive theft of property.


He Takes Away Sin
  
Josef Thats right, you did say that, My bust! No harm, no foul. "the SDA and the JW are borderline devil worshipers." I certainly don't have any opposition to religion, and you will never read anything I've written denouncing any Religious belief. I simply don't want what I share, to be considered an intentional associative reflection of any teaching or dogma held by any of it's affiliates. "I was just happy to find a doctrine, that understands what it means to repent of sin. A word which calls for action, on the part of a sinner." My belief David, is that it is "God" who induces a sorrow that leads one to repentance, and it is He who empowers the turn or reformation. 2Co 7:10


He Takes Away Sin
  
"Samuel
I get you confused with Josef. I know one of you is SDA and the other is a JW."
Apparently you have me confused David. Or did you simply decide to bear false witness against me, on this an open forum? I explained earlier on this very blog, that I have no affiliation with any denominational religion. Do you have reason to believe that I have reason to lie to you, or any one else?


He Takes Away Sin
  
"You will need to confess your sins before God, again to discover what you have been missing. Thank you for your concern David, However thinking yourself to know what I need:o) is a waste of your time. Father has me covered, and it is He who works in me both to will, and to do, that which is pleasing in His sight. I trust Him, and the authority of His Son.


He Takes Away Sin
  
"Josef
I asked this, because it is such an easy way for God to prove to you, unconfessed sin is unforgiven sin. And yet for some reason, I find some folks are reluctant to spend a few minutes with God, to seek this Truth.And I can not figure out why. Is it fear? "
You've lost me David, What exactly are you referring to? And what does it have to do with what I've written?


He Takes Away Sin
  
Thank you Kathr, I appreciate your comment.



Copyright© 2017 ChristiaNet®. All Rights Reserved.